Showing posts with label 2015. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2015. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Care for Our Common Home







by Catherine Austin Fitts
July 5, 2015

from Solari Website










"Yet it must also be recognized that nuclear energy, biotechnology, information technology; knowledge of our DNA, and many other abilities, which we have acquired, have… given those with the knowledge, and especially the economic resources to use them, an impressive dominance over the whole of humanity and the entire world…
In whose hands does all this power lie, or will it eventually end up?
It is risky for a small part of humanity to have it."

(p.77)
Pope Francis





A Papal Encyclical is a letter concerning Catholic doctrine which is circulated by the Pope.



This week, Pope Francis published a new Encyclical: Laudato Si' of the Holy Father Francis - Care for Our Common Home. The 180+ page document sounds the alarm regarding the global degradation of living things: people, animals and our environment.

If this document had been authored by a professor of theology, there would be much room for common ground.



However, it has been written by the leader of an institution which has been the single most powerful in the Western world for the last 500 years - a period during which the central banking-warfare model has been busy harvesting our common home.

There is a profound disassociation from the nuts-and-bolts of what the Catholic Church (and its networks and investment syndicates) have been doing and the sources of their wealth.



This Encyclical is, if you will, a concept piece independent of the financial and political realities of the Vatican, the Catholic Church and its allies.

Assuming that Pope Francis first and foremost addressed the Encyclical to bishops, patriarchs, primates, archbishops as well as to the general population, I would like to propose several steps which the Pope, the Vatican and the leadership of the Catholic Church (collectively, the "Church") might take to integrate some of the best ideas in this document into the power lines controlled and influenced by the Church.


1 - Disclosure

The world is struggling with propaganda, disinformation, and significant suppression of the truth. The new Pope's efforts to provide digital access to works in the Vatican Library on a selective basis are a good start.

In the meantime, there is a great deal of knowledge which the Church, its libraries and networks can share:

The Church can accelerate access to both the Vatican Library and Archives.

The Church can publish all its information regarding global "black budgets." This would include any information related to invisible weaponry and technology driving the real governance systems operating on Planet Earth.

In the context of understanding what is happening to our environment, the Church can publish all its information on global geo-engineering and weather control programs as part of an open discussion to ensure that the global population and scientific community has accurate data on what is happening to our climate.

The Church can provide open access to its financial information and persuade its affiliates, endowments and churches to do the same, including detailed disclosure on a place-based basis.

The Church can encourage global governments to publish their budgets and credit information on a place-based basis. Place-based financial disclosure will permit the alignment of financial ecosystems with environmental ecosystems - a critical step to ensuring a healthy environment. This will create incentive systems which reward the health and well-being of all living things.

The Church can disclose all information on its direct and indirect involvement in any illegal activities, including vote rigging, narcotics trafficking, and money laundering.

The Church can use its shareholdings and ownership positions in media companies to insist on integrity in public information.

The Church can use its shareholdings in pharmaceutical and food companies to insist on integrity and independence of scientific research.

The Church can provide a safe haven for scientists, journalists and other professionals who are targeted for upholding high standards of integrity in science and information.


2 - Individual Freedom

Slavery contributes significantly to the degradation of people throughout our planet.

The Church can withdraw from supporting governments, corporations or any other organizations that support any form of slavery.

The Church can destroy the "control files" of prominent businessmen and politicians created through the use of its networks.

The Church can complete restoration efforts related to its pedophilia activities and publish complete figures on how much the Church has spent on all restoration efforts.

The Church can use its shareholdings and ownership positions in government and corporate securities to insist on a withdrawal of corporate and government support for mind control, torture and slavery and the compromise of individual privacy and sovereignty.


3 - Organized Crime & Lawlessness

The primary source of environmental damage does not result from market economics - quite the opposite.

It results from the lethal combination of organized crime operating powerful and invisible weaponry coupled with invasive digital systems and sophisticated financial tools on scale.

In short, those with the ability to kill, to destroy and to steal with impunity combine such force with fiat currencies, unsustainable debt, resource extraction, financial fraud, war and genocide in order to centralize wealth and power in a manner which shrinks total wealth.

Lawlessness on a global scale must be dealt with before it destroys our planet.

The Church can divest its holdings in governments and corporations which engage in these practices. It should encourage its affiliates and members to do the same.

The Church can also disassociate from foundations and not-for-profits that engage in these practices or that launder profits for those who do.

The Church can make clear that the ten 'commandments' apply not just to what we do, but to whom and what we finance.

The Church can stop any and all participation by itself and its networks in narcotics trafficking and disgorge the profits of the same to the people harmed.


4 - Debt & Fiat Currency

No less than The Economist has rightly pointed out that we are chocking on debt, in part because we provide enormous tax subsidies which encourage debt (see The Great Distortion).

Debt throws people out of alignment with one another and with the environment around them. Ditto fiat currency which is used in a manner to debase global populations and economies.

We must shift to an equity-based financial system which facilitates the free flow of equity unencumbered by the intervention and control of organized crime.

An equity-based system - which includes the financing of small businesses, small farms and local economies with equity - will permit us to evolve a financial system in which we can generate wealth from healing our environment and reducing consumption.

The Church can encourage these changes by shifting the significant funds it manages as well as those managed by its networks.

The Church can encourage governments to reduce laws and regulations that prevent the local circulation of equity or that prevent the creation and success of local currency systems.


5 - Sovereignty is Sacred

A global culture is one which respects the sovereignty of every individual.

We respect human rights. We respect property rights. We respect privacy. We respect the right of each human being to make up their own mind.

The Church can withdraw its investments from all governments and corporations (including media) which compromise people's privacy or which manipulate them via mind control techniques, entrainment technology, subliminal programming or electronics.

The Church can actively encourage its priests and networks to bring transparency to mind control techniques or any efforts to mislead people globally.

The Church can offer sanctuary to scientists, government personnel or journalists who bring transparency to these efforts.


6 - Capitalism - Let's Try It

Before we dismiss capitalism, we should try it.

Organized crime is not capitalism. It is the application of force to control and to get one's way.

Market economics can solve many of the problems before us - but we have to unleash markets to work rather than prevent them from operating and then blaming the subsequent "mess" on them.

The Church can call for all monies stolen by illegal means in the last two decades to be returned, including trillions which have disappeared from the US government or which have been accrued as a result of financial frauds prior to the bailouts.

The Church can refrain from blaming our current situation on the people who have been harmed by these thefts or from insisting that the subsequent economic damage is a result of the victims' poor values or "consumerism."

The Church can withdraw its investment from financial institutions, governments and corporations that:

  • Engage in market rigging and intervention.
  • Provide unlawful or unethical support to cartels and monopolies.
  • Engage in the purposeful suppression of technologies which would ease the harm we are doing to the environment.


The Church and its affiliates and members manage trillions in real estate and financial assets.

As one of the most significant capitalist organizations/investment networks on our planet, it can institute policies to ensure that it does not invest in companies or governments which behave in the manner described in the latest Encyclical and that its real estate is not used to support such activities.

During Vatican II, the Church forced the sale of significant real estate holdings which were serving communities. The proceeds from these sales were reinvested in corporate securities.

The Church can ensure that the Orders for whom these funds are managed have access to full transparency about these investments and are permitted to institute policies which ensure that these investments are managed in accordance with the goals of this Encyclical.



7 - War

Published global military expenditures were $1.7 trillion in 2013. Add secret black budget expenditures and the total was likely much more.

These funds - combined with savings from destructive behavior such as gambling, narcotics and alcohol - could be shifted into investment in healing our environment, our education systems, our health care systems and revitalizing global infrastructure.

The Church can bring transparency to all worldwide resources which are related to killing. It can invite its members to pray that these resources be shifted to investments which increase productivity rather than enable a small group of people to own and control the planet.


8 - Invite Feedback

Both the Church and our planet are dynamic living systems.

Moving to a healthy global culture and aligning our financial ecosystems with our environmental ecosystems is a journey.

The Church can encourage its entire network to adopt these goals in their lives so that achieving them is a partnership of the many for the benefit of all.

The Church can publish an annual report on its efforts to take responsibility and to achieve these goals internally in its own operations, asset managements and investments and to invite feedback from all of its constituents to help it do so.


9 - Wise as a Serpent

There is often a risk that any important policy will be misunderstood or misused by those who are centralizing control and power.

The G-7 nations have experienced a financial coup d'état. A great deal of money and assets have been shifted out of sovereign governments into private hands - either illegally or under the guise of trillions in bailouts and quantitative easing - while liabilities have been shifted back into governments.

Now that these transfers are complete, it would be convenient to blame the victims and to abrogate their pensions and other savings plans and promises.


***


It would be unfortunate if this Encyclical were used to justify the value of doing so in the name of "reducing consumerism" or to politically outmaneuver the victims by accusing them of being "selfish."

Economies function on trust and such trust must come from honoring our agreements. As Pope Francis understands, it is easy to blame the victim and to take from the powerless.

Utah Phillips once said,


"The Planet is not dying, it is being killed. And the people doing the killing have names and addresses."

We commend the Pope for calling out for a cessation of the debasement of all living things.

Let us hope that his latest Encyclical starts ringing doorbells - beginning with the opportunity to do so in the Church and in the Church's asset and investment portfolios...



.

Saturday, January 09, 2016

Beasts, Messages, and Power! - by Bill Hughes






Published on Dec 29, 2015

An important sermon! by pastor Bill Hughes.
Author of the Secret Terrorists & The Enemy Unmasked.

Please write to him:
Box 1417
Eustis, FL 32727

The Secret Terrorists (pdf)
http://pdf.amazingdiscoveries.org/Con...

The Enemy Unmasked (pdf)
http://www.theunhivedmind.com/wordpre...

Prophecy Arise - by Bill Hughes (playlist)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Bill Hughes (Sermons)
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

The Mark of the Beast 666 - Third Angel's Message
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JmRd8...

Sunday Law is coming - LRLTV Special Report׃ April 3rd, 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyadZ...

See HOW the Sunday Law is being Pushed Today
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tua5e...

Arizona State Sen. Sylvia Allen Wants SUNDAY LAWS !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2uu_...

The Mark Of The Beast Is NOT A Microchip! (HD)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgHoVZ...

RE: The Mark Of The Beast Is NOT A Microchip! [PART 2] (HD)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADqnak...


.

Thursday, January 07, 2016

America’s Transition from a Democracy to the National Security State. The Derogation of Civil Rights in the Homeland



In Five Easy Steps. And What We Can Do about It. Part II

Global Research, July 28, 2015



Part One of this analysis set out the main parts of the shift in U.S. government from democracy to National Security State. In this part, we will complete and analyze this development.

5) Do not count (foreign or domestic) civilians as important to State functioning

First, abroad, civilians are “collateral damage,” like destroyed property.

The Bush administration and its generals did not consider the category of discrimination to be of importance. The Obama administration has continued this policy. This is demonstrated by two facts: first, the U.S. military spokespersons have stated directly and consistently that the U.S. does not count the civilian dead in Iraq and Afghanistan. Second, the U.S. government either does not release or downplays civilian casualties in Libya, Syria, Yemen, or from U.S. drone attacks. If it was truly U.S. policy to protect noncombatants from a brutal dictator (e.g. Saddam Hussein; Muammar Gaddafi, Bashir al Assad, etc.) and to avoid injuring or killing them, one would think that knowing how many they have killed or for whose deaths they are at least partly responsible would be something the military would want to know and engage, not suppress.

Contradictory to that practice, by a long and time-honored tradition in ethics and in international law, when the practice of either ignoring (by not taking into account) or intending civilian deaths becomes commonplace, whether proportional or not to the good intention of defeating the enemy, any military action may be said to be conducted unjustly. How the civilians came to be killed is critical, because it tells us directly about the conduct of the war.



Second, the State becomes repressive of citizens domestically. When Supreme Emergency becomes the order of the day, it uses its force against its citizens. For example, Hitler’s February 28 “Decree for the Protection of the People” suspended the articles of the Weimar Constitution concerning personal liberties, and was never repealed.

We are witnessing a similar movement in the U.S. Beginning in 2001 with the USA PATRIOT Act, civil liberties have been deliberately and systematically eroded, while elite privilege has expanded. There are particular issues concerning due process rights and habeas corpus that were eroded under this model. This can be seen in the arrests of both Jose Padilla and Yasser Hamdi, both of which concern due process and habeas corpus rights, denied by the government. Both are U.S. citizens. Hamdi was arrested in 2001, and held without charge by the U.S. government in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It was only with the Supreme Court decision in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld that Hamdi was released. Padilla was arrested in 2002 and held without charge until 2006. For most of their period of detention without charge, neither was permitted legal counsel, or a hearing. It was only due to the pressure of civil liberty groups that each was finally given a hearing.

For Obama’s contribution to this, note his deepening of unchecked surveillance powers (including warrantless wiretapping of citizens, accessing personal records, monitoring financial transactions, and tracking email, internet and cell phone use), his position that the federal government cannot be sued for illegal spying on U.S. citizens, his claims of Executive privilege to order assassinations of U.S. citizens, and his continuation of torture and Guantanamo Bay prison.

All of these actions and others are instances of the direct legislative erasing of any legal status of the individual, in some cases individual U.S. citizens. As if to underscore this point, witness General Wesley Clark stated on MSNBC, on July 17, that dissident citizens should be put in internment camps “for the duration” of the U.S. war on terrorism—i.e. forever.

Kevin Phillips (Wealth and Democracy) and Chalmers Johnson (The Sorrows of Empire) have eloquently traced how these structural mechanisms of government in Rome, Spain, Portugal, and Britain all led to repressive governments which fell quickly when they began to govern through a structure of repression. Today we see the similar structures in place in the U.S., not only in such draconian pieces of legislation as the USA PATRIOT Act, but most chillingly in “continuity of government” (COG) plans, prepared twenty years ago by elite government insiders, which calls for warrantless surveillance, warrantless detention, and militarizing domestic security to keep dissent nonexistent (see Peter Dale Scott, “The Doomsday Project, Deep Events, and the Shrinking of American Democracy” The Asia-Pacific Journal, January 24, 2011).

Conclusion: Three steps for making change

The obvious question is: how can we stop this and make the critical changes needed to and in our government apparatus? I would conclude this essay by suggestion three actions that may be taken.

First, recognize that U.S. citizens themselves must make the changes required to and in government. With the foundational mode of state structure and purpose being to achieve and maintain complete state hegemony in the world, radical change of state structure is required. This can only be done with some kind of people’s push to return the power to themselves, as we saw in Egypt and Tunisia, and now see in Greece. It will come slowly and painstakingly, but without it, state mechanisms will continue to be structured as hegemonic agencies, and perpetual war and continued assault upon citizen rights will be the ongoing and deepening modus operandi of the state.

Second, focus objective analysis on ethical and legal prescriptions as well as empirical facts and consequences. Too often political analysis revolves around a theme of “this move, that consequence” by our political leaders. However, ethically speaking, objective analysis can be done by analyzing how government actions fit or do not fit universal ethical norms. A good norm would be, as the German philosopher Jurgen Habermas puts it, to recognize that for authentic communication between parties to take place, all affected must be able to accept the consequences of any proposed norm.

This strategy does two things: it pre-empts the charge from opponents that one believes only according to one’s ideology; and it allows one to see and show the pattern of a movement from democracy to fascism.

Here is an application of such analysis. Let us examine the crime of aggression of Obama’s drone strikes, specifically the U.S. use of drones in Yemen and Pakistan. The U.S. first said it used targeted killing in November 2002, with the cooperation and approval of the government of Yemen. But as of 2013, the U.S. had more than 6,000 drones, more than 160 of which were Predator drones controlled by the U.S. Air Force. These drones are being used in Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen, but most of all in Pakistan, where in eight years the drones killed close to 4,000 people (see Gregoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone).

On June 3, 2009, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) delivered a report sharply critical of US tactics. The report asserted that the US government has failed to keep track of civilian casualties of its military operations, including the drone attacks, and to provide means for citizens of affected nations to obtain information about the casualties and any legal inquests regarding them.

Obama’s response: ignore the U.N. report, and increase the drone attacks, thus instantiating what neocon architect Francis Fukuyama stated: the U.N. is “perfectly serviceable as an instrument of American unilateralism” When it isn’t, the National Security State can and does ignore them. (see Chomsky,Hegemony or Survival).

Contradictory to that, we would have a solid ethical and legal analysis of U.S. drone actions by quoting a tentative definition of aggression which was adopted by the U.N. International Law Commission on June 4, 1951. It stated:

“Aggression is the use of force by a State or Government against another State or Government, in any manner, whatever the weapons used and whether openly or otherwise, for any reason or for any purpose other than individual or collective self-defence or in pursuance of a decision or recommendation by a competent organ of the United Nations.”

Further, in 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle VI, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

Again, we should apply the Geneva Conventions against Attacking Civilians. Article 51, Section 2 proscribes “indiscriminate attacks:” those not directed at specifically military targets; those attacks or weapons that cannot be limited to military objectives and that strike civilians or civilian objects as well as military ones; and attacking military targets that the belligerent has reason to believe in advance will cause excessive and disproportionate damage to civilians or civilian objects, the latter defined simply as non-military objects.

Protocol II, “relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts,” specifically calls upon all nations to refrain from all “violence to the life, health, and physical and mental well-being of [noncombatant] persons.”

Finally, the Hague Conventions of 1899 ban the attacking of towns and cities that are undefended, and collective punishment. Prescriptions to limit the conduct of war include the requirements to warn towns of impending attacks, to protect cultural, religious, and health institutions, and to insure public order and safety.

Third, understand that civil disobedience is the only weapon citizens have to fight such overwhelming methods of force that are now in place. The state—on both federal and local government levels—now possesses so much military-level force and political-economic power that they can fairly easily respond to any type of violent action. Nonviolence is the only option, especially since, to work, nonviolence requires a force in numbers. When that happens, the fear moves from the people to the government officials and their economic elite controllers who currently rule the country.

The motivating factor for such disobedience is often said to be economic hardship, such as the citizens of Greece are undergoing. That is certainly true, but in addition to that, U.S. citizens are used to a more developed and robust conception of human and civil rights, and the practice of limited government in terms of such rights. This assumption of most citizens makes a full-blown totalitarian state such as Hitler’s or Mussolini’s unlikely. Nonetheless, it is certainly conceivable and possible that a totalitarian-light state can exist while leaving in place the main skeleton of a republican democracy that has long since been reduced to a minimal democracy, virtually without most citizens seeing it and without angering citizens too much. This is especially true if the citizens live in fear and are willing to grant the government significant leeway in its responses to the trumped-up fear of terrorists. That is precisely what has happened since 9/11, and precisely what civil disobedience attempts to overcome.

Objective, public analysis and civil nonviolent action are our best weapons against government power. They are, in fact, not just our best hope; they are all we have left with which to fight.

Dr. Robert Abele holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Marquette University and M.A. degrees in Theology and Divinity. He is a professor of philosophy at Diablo Valley College, in California in the San Francisco Bay area. He is the author of four books, including A User’s Guide to the USA PATRIOT Act, and The Anatomy of a Deception: A Logical and Ethical Analysis of the Decision to Invade Iraq, along with numerous articles. His new book, Rationality and Justice, is forthcoming (2016).


The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Robert Abele, Global Research, 2015


.

Monday, January 04, 2016

YEAR IN REVIEW: Our Top Ten Conspiracies of 2015


DECEMBER 31, 2015 BY SHAWN HELTON




Patrick Henningsen and Shawn Helton
21st Century Wire

With the year coming to a close, it’s time to take stock of some of the more gripping conspiratorial events and stories covered by 21WIRE over the past year. Once again, it was a year that defied reason or logic the world over. From Paris to Palmyra, San Bernardino to Sanaa, or from Roanoke to Raqqa – there’s never been a year like 2015.


As was the case in 2014, there were a number of other high-profile news stories we could have included in this year’s conspiratorial exposé but within our top ten list, we’ve chosen to focus on not only the most important events, but also the most improbable ones as well. While CNN and other majors spent the summer doing a live reenactment of Prison Break ala milk toast, we remained busy digging into the false flag terror, NGO soft power complex, Operation GLADIO 2.0 and deconstructing the active-shooter paradox.

However, it’s worth mentioning some of the more notable stories from the year that didn’t make the top ten – such as the FBI-linked Chris Lee Cornell entrapment ‘terror’ plot, the Baltimore Riots that ensued after a local drug dealer, Freddy Gray, died while in police custody (a reboot of the Michael Brown saga), Tunisia’s mysterious Sousse Resort Shooting, the polarizing rise of reality TV star and real estate mogul Donald Trump into American politics, the bizarre death of a British journalist at a Turkish airport, Europe’s Great Migrant Crisis, the Greek euro-crisis andthe rise and fall of Syriza, the formation of a New EU Army, the exposing of a faux NGO known as the White Helmets in Syria, the intensity of terrorist activity by Boko Haram in West Africa, and the emergence of the Iran Nuclear Deal, an explosive foreign policy drama that has only just started to unfold.

We hope you’ll find that this is the best ‘conspiracy countdown’ on the web this holiday season.

Below is our Top Ten list of conspiracies from 2015 – a year which saw the rise of the active shooter, ISIS going global, and a plethora of other synthetic plots, consensus realities and geopolitical memes…

10. The Burning of a Jordanian Pilot – This was perhaps the most dramatic production in the now infamous ‘ISIS Video Series’. The alleged burning of captured Jordanian pilot Moaz al-Kasasbeh was a propagandized event that should be treated with immense suspicion, as the pilot’s apparent death displayed all the signs of being a choreographed ‘geopolitically’ timed ISIS feature film. Along with other high-profile ISIS on-screen killings, the burning of pilot Kasasbeh, depicted a stylized scene that was completed with multiple camera angles, modern Hollywood-like editing and a gripping social media campaign tailor-made for Western audiences by which to be seduced. The video of the pilot’s ‘death’ was a flashy quick edit MTV-style production entitled, “Healing of the Believers’ Chests,” a production which was said to have been released through social media on February 3rd in 2015. However, Jordanian officials later changed the script, claiming that Kasasbeh was killed on January 3rd – something which was never fully explained by US authorities, Jordan, or the SITE Intelligence Group – all of whom held on to the details of the pilot’s alleged burning to be timed with other events related to the conflict in Syria (like Charlie Hebdo). Seemingly out of desperation from the botched Kasasbeh story, the media unveiled a ready-made-tragedy – the kidnapping and airstrike death of a American aid worker and ‘activist’ Kayla Jean Mueller. According to the official media narrative, an angry Jordanian leader immediately ordered airstrikes against ISIS, and if by magic, ISIS then announced that the American Kayla Mueller was killed in captivity during those same airstrikes. A perfect end to a near perfect story. Then the media claimed that Mueller was forced to marry ISIS leader Abu Bakr al–Baghdadi who raped and tortured her – a fellow captive said. Mueller was said to have been taken hostage in August of 2013, although for over two years, there was zero media coverage about her alleged plight, no calls for her release, and yet oddly, in May of that same year in 2013, Syrian Rebel front-man US Senator John McCain (R-AZ) was in the exact same area where Mueller was allegedly working in Northern Syria. He said he was there to meet with his “moderate” rebels who in fact turned out to be terrorist fighters, jihadists and mercenaries. Given the foreknowledge of the events listed above and their designed outcome, the burning of pilot Kasasbeh, and the apparent death of Mueller – became two more examples of the propaganda war waged by the West in the Middle East.

Read more about the Jordanian Pilot story here

9. The Unmasking of Jihadi John – 2015 possessed a myriad of media-driven personalities, but none were more compelling than the media-friendly terror avatar known as ‘Jihadi John’. The ISIS frontman’s video threats and staged beheadings surfaced in August of 2014, and lasted into January of 2015. They were carefully crafted propaganda pieces (presented by the highly dubious SITE Intelligence Group) and were meant to evoke an emotional response for the Western public – which they did. The media couldn’t get enough of the actor Jihadi John.While the black-clad villain’s videos appeared to be crudely staged green screen productions (but apparently good enough to fool the mainstream media and US and EU politicians) when compared to the heavily orchestrated large-scale ISIS executions that premiered in early 2015, there is no doubt that the ISIS video psychodrama has aided Western foreign policy objectives in both Syria and in Iraq, as coalition forces used the terror troupe’s media exploits for their surreptitious proxy war against the Syrian government, while also advancing a pretext for a larger conflict in war-torn Iraq. Moreover, the unmasking and alleged ‘drone assassination’ of Jihadi John in 2015, where US officials claimed, “we are reasonably certain he died in a drone strike” (if you believe that one, we have a compound in Abbotabad to sell you), the most amazing part of the Jihadi John drama was that British security services decided to disclose that they had known the identity of the terror mascot for over 6 months. It didn’t end there. While this news stunned the international community – it was then revealed that the man suspected of being the ISIS mouthpiece was known by MI5 for the past 6 years. The identity of the infamous ISIS actor was revealed to be a 27-year-old British computer programmer named Mohammad Emwazi from West London. This came after months of speculation that Emwazi’s friend from well-to-do Maida Vale, Abdel-Majed Abdel Bary was alleged to be the terror persona depicted in the beheading videos. In fact, it turned out that the pair had a longtime friendship, living just streets apart and were known as the “London Boys,” which featured a network of fanatics in West London linked back to the contemptible preacher Anjem Choudary (a likely MI5 informant alongside his previous cohort, the flamboyant tabloid mascot, Abu Hamza) who along with Omar Bakri, founded the terror labeled organization, Al-Muhajiroun. The banned terror group was known to be a prime recruitment tool by British intelligence as reported by The Guardian in 2005. Back in 2009, UK intelligence services in partnership with Metropolitan Police, announced the existence of a covert social engineering effort known as the The Channel Project, which was being run in hopes of targeting children with traits that may indicate an affinity to “extreme” views and a susceptibility to being groomed by “radicalisers” in the future. It goes without saying, that a secret program of this kind could just as easily be used to groom future ‘radicals’ and informants, too. Western political leaders and their media arms publicly discuss the idea of so-called terror ‘sleeper cells’ hiding in a nation near you, but none of them will acknowledge the historical fact that they themselves help to harbor, grow, foment and radicalize individuals through secret counter-terrorism operations. The entirety of the Jihadi John saga is wrought with questions, about Emwazi, the apparent drone assassination, the fake videos, and what sort of bizarre operation is being run by the British Police State – and how it’s connected to Islamic terror internationally. With Jihadi John out of the picture (for now), expect even more media sleight of hand directed at Western audiences.

Read more about Jihadi John here

8. Germanwings Flight 9525 – With Flight MH370 still missing, and the downing of Flight MH17 still unsolved, the last thing the world needed was another plane mysteriously falling out of the sky. The mainstream media plunged into overdrive in April 2015, spinning sensational theories regarding the suspicious high-flying tragedy involving Germanwings flight 9525. Immediately following the crash, news agencies systematically and collectively engaged in what can only be described as a post-mortem ‘character assassination’ of Andreas Lubitz, the German-born co-pilot and First Officer of Germanwings flight 9525. In keeping with the modern media circus, it quickly proved to be another case of trial by media and conviction in the court of public opinion. Lubitz was charged with deliberately crashing the Lufthansa owned aircraft prior to a full forensic investigation and without a full analysis of the black box recorder. The far-fetched claims about his mental well-being (suicide rehearsal theory) at the time of the crash only increased as coverage of this story grew, something which failed to explain how a pilot with limited flight time was able to manuever the A320 Airbus into a controlled descent without spiraling out of control according to flight experts. The Germanwings tragedy echoed other bizarre airline disasters in recent history; in 2014, there were a number of theories regarding the unprecedented loss ofMH370 and the highly suspicious downing of MH17 and the cover-up by the West (engineered to blame Russian leadership) in the wake of crisis in the Ukraine. Other less talked about theories concerning some of these recent airline disasters include the existence of the rarely discussed breakthrough in avionics, a very real technology known as the Boeing Honeywell ‘Uninterruptible’ Autopilot System. Once this advanced system is engaged, it can disallow any pilot or potential hijacker from controlling a plane manually, as the rooted setup uses digital signals that communicate with air traffic control, satellite links, giving government entities the ability to seize the airliner in mid-journey.

More about the Germanwings disaster here

7. Summer of the Daily Shooter – Undoubtedly, 2015 was The Year of the Daily Shooter. This year’s smoldering global political scene gave way to a string of unreal shooting events across America, many of which took place over the summertime, bleeding into the fall. While the public was still trying to comprehend the shocking and questionable Charlie Hebdo Attacks (see below)in early January, things began heating up in early May, when it was reported that two ‘Islamic’ gunmen allegedly opened fire outside of a cartoon ‘art’ exhibition and alleged “free speech contest” featuring provocative images of the Prophet Muhammad in Garland, Texas. The incident was quickly labeled a “terror attack,” along with the vague and forensically undefined ‘ISIS inspired’ tag for dramatic effect. A pair of shooters, Elton Simpson (shadowed by a paid FBI informant) and Nadir Hamid Soofi, are said to have targeted a bizarre “Muhammad Art Exhibit and Cartoon Contest” that was organized by the American Freedom Defense Initiative, led by anti-Islamic Israeli lobbyist and somewhat unsightly media personality, Pamela Geller. It was a staged event that clearly echoed the Charlie Hebdo story line, with the Garland incident preempted by a twitter post linked to Junaid Hussain, aka Abu Hussain al-Britani occurring around the time of the attack (British-born cyber hacker linked to CENTCOM’s Twitter account by a group calling themselves the “Cyber Caliphate.”) similar to that of Paris shootings, where an image depicting ISIS ringleader/operative Al-Baghdadi, was tweeted just two hours before the highly organized magazine shooting took place. Within a short period of time following the suspicious events in Garland, it was revealed that Simpson, one of the alleged suspects in the Garland shooting, had been under the watchful eye of the FBI for nearly a decade and was in close contact with an undercover informant during that time, similarly outlining the intelligence-linked Kouachi Brothers who were implicated in the Charlie Hebdo incident. And, as a hot and humid summer took shape during another strange Shooting in Charleston, South Carolina, public perception was once again under assault. A hornet’s nest of media engineered tension was kicked – stating that 21 year-old Dylann Storm Roof supposedly joined a ‘bible study session’ at the all-black AME Church on the evening of June 17th, prior to opening fire on an unsuspecting group of nine parishioners. As the apparent motive in the Charleston church shooting rapidly emerged, authorities stated that Roof gave a full confession shortly after being captured. According to reports, Roof was linked to a racially charged ‘manifesto’ which was posted to a website believed to have materialized sometime in February of 2015. The alleged manifesto, which was not signed by anyone, and which seemed to belie the life experience of someone Roof’s age and interests. And When examining the tirade against different races, wars and patriotism in America, the writer of the vitriolic message claimed to have typed the manifesto up in a hurry – though it read as if it was scripted well in advance. Like many other bizarre shootings across America, the Charleston church shooting seemed to have many anomalies, in addition to a multi-agency mass casualty drill taking place in Eastover, South Carolina, sometime before the church shooting. It was then revealed that Roof plotted his attack for some six months and that he was from the Eastover area. While America was mired in a Confederate Flag controversy due to the imagery depicted (triggering a wave of Confederate flag props plastered all over the US media) featuring Roof in the many staged photos – perhaps the most unsettling and striking aspect of this event was that the Department of Justice apparently fast-tracked $29 million dollars in the wake of this tragedy to all the families affected during the event from the Crime Victim Assistance Formula Grantprogram. Incredible. This crucial detail will forever give critics of the incident much to question regarding the Charleston church shooting. And just as the dust was settling in Charleston, we learned there was even more “Trouble in the Homeland” with yet another alleged terror inspired individual named Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazeez. As bizarre and conflicting reports emerged regarding a shooting on July 16th at a US Marine Corps strip mall recruitment center and a secure Navy Operational Support Center in Chattanooga, Tennessee, the focus of media coverage, gave the false perception that people were shot within the mall area – out in the open. However, 48 hours later, it was revealed that victims of the shooting event – were actually shot and killed inside of a secure Navy Reserve Training facility. It’s also important to note, that on very same day as the apparent Chattanooga shooting, Dark Knight shooter James Holmes, was convicted on twenty-four counts of first-degree murder, 140 counts of attempted first-degree murder, one count of possessing explosives, for his role in the dramatic Aurora theater shooting in 2012. Less than a week after the Chattanooga incident, another ‘active-shooter’ scenario played out inside of Layfayette, Louisiana’s Grand Theater. According to reports, shortly after a film screening of the Hollywood trash-comedy Trainwreck had begun that evening, 59 year-old John Russell ‘Rusty’ Houser allegedly shot 11 people (13-20 rounds were fired) with many supposedly wounded multiple times – without any clear motive. According to Lafayette Police Chief Jim Craft, 12 ambulances arrived at the scene within six minutes, while Houser’s apparent getaway vehicle was parked outside a theater exit. The medical response time was unprecedented by Acadian Ambulance, a company embroiled in legal woes and in need of a better reputation. Acadian’s vice president of marketing for Personal Emergency Response Devices, Randall Mann, rushed to the theater after being notified that his daughterEmily Mann had been inside the screening when the shooting occurred. And, it turns out, she just happened to be sitting in the same row as the alleged shooter. Lafayette’s Daily Shooter tale was one of strange coincidence, uncanny medical response, with a backdrop of legal trouble, mental illness and an informant related past. (In another bizarre coincidence following the Lafayette shooting, the Oklahoma City Bombing trial was finally concluded.) On the surface Chattanooga appears to have little in common with the Lafayette incident. However, there is some connective tissue between both events, as both tied into parallel fear and control based narratives in terms of perceived radicalism in America. Whether it’s the ‘grafting’ of an overseas terror based story line or the concept of a rogue patriot-like ‘lone wolf’ persona, we see a psychic assault on the masses, one that could potentially convince the public into giving up their civil liberties. Nearly two weeks after the anomaly ridden Lafayette shooting, there was what appeared to be a Multi-agency ‘Active Shooter’ Drill at a Nashville movie theater, as a suspect with a gun, hatchet, pepper spray and “hoax explosive device,” was killed by authorities after an alleged shootout with police. Again, police response time was within minutes of the incident. The dog days of August brought us another heavily staged,  Made-for-TV Shooting event in Roanoke, Virginia, (August 26th) an incident apparently caught on live television. However, it quickly emerged through alternative media sleuthing, that the alleged shooter’s skin tone in a self-produced video didn’t match the main suspect in that case, 41-year-old African-American man named Vester Flanagan, a person who also possessed the media stage name Bryce Williams. While holding a gun close-up in clear sight of the victims, Flanagan’s gunfire appeared to be consistent with that of blanks being fired. Additionally, one of the apparent victims, TV reporterAlison Parker quickly turned and ran away from the alleged assailant while taking three shots from less than ten feet away. There were ready-made love stories and tales of a gunman on the run who eventually – so we’re told, took his own life, as authorities closed in. The story conjured many other recent high-profile shootings including the dramatic case of Chris Dorner back in 2013. And just as the public was catching their breath over the apparent summer of the Daily Shooter, September ushered in a massive manhunt in Fox Lake, Illinois to find three alleged suspects in the shooting of a local police officer named Charles Joseph ‘G.I. Joe’ Gliniewicz, this strange case saw the mobilization of a “Shelter In Place” Martial Law lock-down on all 10,000 residents of Fox Lake – put in place within 90 mintues. 21WIRE highlighted a number of questions concerning the incident and if in fact there really were any real suspects involved in the officer’s death. In early November, the mysterious shooting was revealed to be an elaborate cover-up, which authorities now claimed was a self-staged suicide, that involved money laundering and a murder for hire plot. Hardly believable, after one of the biggest man-hunt hoaxes ever. Following the Fox Lake hoax, the month of October ushered in an incredible ‘mass shooting’ at Umpqua Community College located in Roseburg, Oregon (home of the Ford Foundation, coincidentally). It wasn’t long before this national media event was used to promote new gun control legislation, wrapped up in a winding plot line and a series of unexplained items. The dramatized mass-shooting occurred on October 1st, and revealed yet more staging of mass drills, as well as uncanny links to gun control advocates and military celebrities (military reservist Alek Skarlatos, the Paris Train Hero), a large cache of weapons, changing narratives, a heavy-handed social media campaign, a ‘USB manifesto’ and unexplained family history. The event had shades of Sandy Hook and many other questionable shooting incidents, revealing the usual media array of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) designed to alter societal or individual behaviour. As these televised shooting events have become intertwined with our daily lives, with their strikingly similar gunman profiles, media talking points and staged (mass drills) press conferences – a virtual reality is now on full display in America’s ‘active-shooter’ paradox (see the San Bernardino shooting story below).

Read more Daily Shooter stories here

6. The Fall of Yemen – One year on, few are aware of just how this monumental debacle kick-started its media coverage and was cycled into the mainstream ‘humanitarian interventionist’ narrative. Painting a new target on Yemen required some creative script writing which cast the protagonists in the Charlie Hebdo attacks, the Kouachi Brothers, as having a connection to Yemen. This bit of international intrigue was achieved by first claiming that the younger brother, Chérif Kouachi, had somehow traveled from France to Yemen in 2011, and received weapons training from the CIA’s celebrated comic book terror villain Anwar al-Awlaki (a CIA-FBI double agent/informant who dined at the Pentagon before his role was retired on September 30, 2011) head of the illusive Al Qaeda in the Arabian Penninsula (AQAP). The only problem here was thatTom Clancy Unit had to deal with the fact that Chérif actually had his passport revoked years earlier. To fix this crimp, ‘sources’ then claimed that Cherif used his brother Said Kouachi’s passport to travel to Yemen. Later, the story was changed again, claiming that both brothers had gone to Yemen between 2009-2010. As if by magic, a single French journalist (gatekeeper) from BMFTV somehow spoke to all three Hebdo shooters, and claims to have spoken to ‘the terrorist’ Cherif who politely told him,“I was sent, me, Cherif Kouachi, by al Qaeda in Yemen. I went there and Sheikh Anwar al-Awlaki financed my trip!” How convenient. This triggered yet another script crisis where security sources could not explain how Awlaki had ordered the mission when they it’s been claimed that the terror icon was supposedly killed by a US drone strike… in 2011. Their answer was simply, ‘they were a sleeper cell, laying in waiting for 4 years.’ After endless script revisions, the media eventually gave up and moved on to the world’s newest ‘terror hot bed’… in Yemen. After a gradual media build-up of months demonizing Yemen, and with the paid-for Right-wing US media outlets recycling the false talking point that Iran was responsible for the ousting of the defunct US and Saudi puppet leader President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, the US finally announced in March that Saudi Arabia would break every international law by doing the same dirty operation which NATO had done in Libya – namely, destroying the country by months of carpet bombing and backing jihadist militants on the ground. This was the first time that a US Gulf ally took over the role of military enforcers in the region, unleashing the wanton brutality and mass “collateral damage” normally reserved for war hawks in Washington. The Saudi-led massacre in Yemen is an illegal war of aggression according to every international law – complete with cluster bombs, ethnic cleansing and US covert operations. It remains of the most under reported stories in western media and 2015 –and now we can see why.


5. The Charlie Hebdo Event – Only a week into the new year, the world received a strong dose of false flag terror. The now legendary Charlie Hebdo Attacks will certainly go down as one of the most spectacular and convoluted staged media events in the modern Daily Shooter genre. Who would have known… a failing French ‘satire’ cartoon magazine, Charlie Hebdo, would suddenly enter the world spotlight over its offensive publicity stunt which magically morphed into an international terrorist event. Two French-Algerian gunmen are said to have stormed the offices of the magazine in the morning, killing 12 people and injuring others. The gunmen, known in fictional media circles as, “The Kouachi Brothers”, were chased down to a warehouse outside of town where they were said to have been shot and killed by brave security services. As it turned out, they were caught because one of the brothers allegedly left his I.D. on the seat of the abandoned get-away car (see later, ‘magic passport’). Suddenly, a third actor emerged, Amedi Coulibaby, who is said to have taken over a Kosher store in Paris, where he is said to have shot and killed four people there. The kosher leg of the story served two important purposes: 1) It made this an attack on the world’s Jewish community and by extension somehow, Israel as well, and 2) The gunman was said to have been “inspired by ISIS” (he printed out an ISIS flag on an A4 inkjet and taped it on the wall behind him during his obligatory ‘martyrdom’ video), which made it an “ISIS Attack”, in media terms. After the terror hell, came the hashtag hell. Not only were all three terrorists “known wolves” – well-known by the French security services, they were also under surveillance at the same time of the incident. Amazing right? Just another coincidence, right? Unfortunately for the script writers of this event, all evidence points to this being a staged false flag event. Within hours of the news, #hashtags, posters and banners began to suddenly appear everywhere, with the words #JeSuisCharlie (I am Charlie, or ‘we are all Charlie’). It echoed previous sophisticated Twitter campaigns like the US State Department’s previous farcical ‘interventionist’ marketing campaign #Kony2012, and more recently the White House’s #BringBackOurGirls ‘Bokoharam’ social media campaign. If that wasn’t bad enough, all of the world’s leaders and brutal dictators then jet-setted into Paris for one of the most disgusting and hypocritical photo-ops ever seen. What’s more, this group of middle-aged, xenophobic Lotharios and marginally talented cartoonists at what used to be a failing publication – became international heroes overnight, and magazine went on to sell millions of copies, literally overnight. What this staged production achieved, however, was that it started a wave of anti-Muslim paranoia which ripped through western Europe and North America, where it was suddenly ‘OK to hate Muslims’ and all in the name of “free speech” – a movement which then gradually gained steam, culminating in an even bigger and more elaborate staged event yet to come. The Clash of Civilizations narrative was back, and bigger than ever.

4. Russian Su-24 Fighter Jet Downed – On November 24th, Turkey admitted that it had shot down a Russian Su-24 Fighter Bomber that was flying a mission along the Syrian-Turkish border earlier. NATO member Turkey claimed that the Russian aircraft had ‘violated’ Turkish airspace – and the western media swallowed that claim hook, line and sinker. Turkey also claimed it had “warned Russian fighter 10 times” before it fired its air-to-air missiles. That turned out to be a lie. As per their previous ‘deconfliction’ arrangement, the US and NATO had sent the Russian mission details in advance of the incident, and despite denials from the West, Turkey had actually shot down the Russian Fighter inside of Syria’s airspace. The move was a clear provocation by NATO and Turkey. Russian pilots who had ejected were then fired upon by US/Turkish-backed “moderate” jihadist terrorists on the ground in northern Syria. After killing one of the pilots, the “moderates” then dragged his body through the woods and posted their video on Twitter. This incident pushed an already tense situation closer to the WWIII scenario that many feared could cascade as a result of the international chaos in and around Syria.Experts are now pointing out that while Russia is flying missions legally (under international law, at the invitation of the Syrian gov’t), the US-led ‘Coalition’ is not. It wouldn’t be the first time. While some pundits began speculating about Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan suffering a‘Sultan Complex’, others were worried that Russia’s Vladimir Putin would up the ante and escalate military tensions between Russia and NATO. In the end, it was Russia who showed restraint and appealed to the international community to help resolve the crisis. For Turkey, however, things went from bad to worse. This incident was significant because it switched on an electron microscope of scrutiny over shadow operations of the region’s most dubious actor – Turkey. Perhaps it was no coincidence that just before Turkey shot down the Russian plane, it was Russia who had just bombed ISIS oil supplies heading to Turkey from Syria. Up until then, Turkey appears have made-off like a bandit, getting away with allowing complete and free movement of ISIS fighters, weapons, and black market oil – in and out of Syria and northern Iraq. The incident, coupled together with the previous downing of the Russian Metrojet passenger airliner over Egypt’s Sinai a few weeks earlier – killing all 227 passengers and crew, served to harden Russia’s resolve and has since won it more support internationally than before. Although CNN and the western media still maintain that “ISIS terrorists” brought down the Metrojet with a can of Schweppes Soda (no, seriously), and even as crash investigators have concluded that explosives were involved, there is still no actual forensic evidence which suggests that ISIS itself brought down the passenger jet, although other suspect actors in the region seem to have been active in the area.

3. Paris Attacks – Friday the 13th. It was the year’s most spectacular terror production, broadcasting internationally for weeks on end. The Paris Attacks took the Charlie Hebdo narrative to a new level. A wave of “ISIS inspired attacks” are said to have taken the lives of 130 victims and injured many others. The media frenzy kicked into action. Amid the hysteria,21WIRE took to the airwaves, and made a series of predictions – all of which came true shortly after. Upon closer examination, however, the Paris Attacks had all the telltale signs of being yetanother false flag attack, designed to scare the global public, further demonize Islam, and provide the pretext for NATO to escalate their campaign of violence against Syria. Right on cue, less than 48 hours later, French president Francois Hollande seized the opportunity and launched airstrikes in Syria, supposedly against “ISIS targets” (although none were actually hit,instead France bombed museums and stadiums in Raqqa). Although the media and authorities jumped on this event as an “ISIS-inspired event” where the terrorists had allegedly “sneaked into France undercover of the Syrian migrant crisis”, there was never any real, hard forensic evidence that tied any of the alleged gunman to ISIS. In order to bridge this incredible gap, however, script writers conjured a “Magic Passport” of Syrian origin at the scene of the attacks, which they claimed proved this was an ISIS event. When the passport turned out to be fake, and was likely planted at the scene of the crime (in order to create the entire narrative), the media then went into rear guard mode, spinning ever more incredible stories about mentally challenged “Masterminds”, “sweeping terror raids” and an endless litany of reports about “dangerous fugitives on the loose” in both France and Belgium. The Paris Attacks saw another ridiculous hashtag campaign overtake Twitter, this time it was #JeSuisChien in memory of apolice dog that authorities said was blown up during an anti-terror raid. The festival of fear carried on through December. As with other similar events, numerous reports depicting crisis actors began circulating, causing a wave a skepticism about whether or not Paris was staged for geopolitical ends as with previous NATO-run domestic terror efforts like Operation GLADIO. What this staged event achieved more than anything, was that it managed to join two mainstream narratives – ISIS and the Migrant Crisis. What followed was a wave of anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim fervor which spread through European political discourse, with calls to shut down European borders internally and externally – and in the US Republican presidential election cycle, it prompted calls to ban all Muslims from entering the US. Islamophobia had now reached mainstream status it seemed. In Britain, PM David Cameron used the momentum of Paris to pass his war vote through Parliament. All of the sudden, half of America was talking about more “boots on the ground” in Syria and Iraq. For the war hawks, Paris was the gift that kept on giving…

2. The San Bernardino Shooting – This highly improbable tale involved a laundry list of anomalies – bringing the “active-shooter” genre to an entirely new level. The San Bernardino Shooting picked up where false flag events such as the Charlie Hebdo incident, Garland and Chattanooga left off, while at the same time unfolding like the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook, an event with multiple eyewitness accounts, and multiple suspects apprehended at the scene. It was a striking event that didn’t seem to make any sense – one filled with whitewashed reports, amedia-scripted ransacking of the alleged ‘shooters’ home (tampering with a potential crime scene) and eyewitness accounts that contradicted the official narrative. And, in the very room where 14 people were reportedly killed (along with 21 injured) during a deadly shooting attack at the Inland Regional Center, there was an active-shooter training drill involving some of the victims almost a year prior to the attack. Detailed eye-witness testimony from Sally Abdelmageed in a CBS interview with Scott Pelley revealed that three white men in tactical gear dressed in black were involved in the shooting incident. This report was confirmed by other eyewitness testimony. The militarized police response during the San Bernardino Shooting also echoed various aspects of the Virginia TV shooting, Fox Lake’s shooting/lock-down, the famousChris Dorner Manhunt from 2013, and the Lafayette and Nashville shootings’ emergency response overkill. We were also told, that the suspected shooters Syed Farook and his wifeTashfeen Malik had died in a dramatic chase/shootout with police, and the entire event unfolded like a multi-agency drill as several armored MRAPs methodically approaching the apparent shooting suspect’s SUV with some 380 rounds fired at the vehicle in a televised scene. Incredibly, two weeks after the shooting event, the FBI revealed that the ‘terror couple’ did NOT post any radical posts on social media – something which was central in providing a subliminal motive for the apparent crime. The San Bernardino story seemed to serve several purposes, creating further cultural and religious divides with blanket xenophobia spreading like wildfire, while reigniting the old War on Terror meme, now rebranded as the ‘War on Radical Islam’, for new audiences to be politically seduced by for future war-theater in the Middle East, in addition to opening the door for sweeping national security changes. San Bernardino also mirrored theChattanooga shooting narrative, in that both events that failed to provide a solid motive or believable timeline. An All-American appellation added to the enigma of the ‘Muslim-American’, thus dispensing a massive viral, wide-spread subliminal fear and Islamophobia. Similar to the Charlie Hebdo connection to the US-Saudi proxy war in Yemen, San Bernardino seems to have set the stage for an apparent Al-Qaeda connection via Pakistan, along with an invented ISIS link. The Federal government wasted no time in using this event to call for a ban on consumer encryption and privacy protection by using the bogus argument that the govt could not keep tabs on the alleged shooters because of consumer cell phone and social media encryption. This is a blatant power-grab by Washington. This event should be a case study for anyone interested in media criticism or critical thinking, as it displayed both national and international implications, all wrapped in a ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ psy-op. Above all else, however, San Bernardino serviced both sides of America’s left-right political paradigm. For the left, it delivered loud liberal cries for “gun control”, and for the rabid right – it fueled a demand for more “national security” at home and abroad. Could this be the new false flag prototype for America going forward into 2016?

1. ISIS Unmasked – Incredibly, most western governments still cannot decide what its proper name is – ISIS, ISIL, IS, Daesh, or “Dash”as president Obama calls it. Still, unbeknownst to the globalist architects of chaos and instability, many of the staged provocations mentioned above did more to unmask the synthetic “ISIS Crisis” than they did reinforce its weakening mythology. Perhaps the greatest revelations which came of top conspiracies like the Migrant Crisis, theTurkish Shoot-down of the Russian Su-24, and the infamous ISIS Video Series – was that each of these helped to reveal Turkey’s pivotal role in facilitating the rise of ISIS and other terrorist groups currently destroying Syria and Iraq. Besides hosting a vast network of training camps and other terrorist R&R venues, Turkey has enabled the free flow of terrorist fighters, weapons, cash, as well as a lucrative black market ISIS oil trade – all of which exposes how Turkey is a prime mover in fueling the progress of the so-called ‘Islamic State’. 21WIRE’s comprehensive report on the illicit ISIS Oil Trade provides some shocking revelations on this subject. We also learned how neighboring Jordan has also played a key role in facilitating the terror brigades, as has Israel too. Another revelation happened in October; with Russia entering the Syrian quagmire, and with its rapid success in degrading and destroying ISIS and al Nusra terrorist positions in Syria – the world quickly realized that the US and its allies did nothing to repel ISIS and al Qaeda over the previous 18 months – and actually allowed these terror groups to advance their strategic positions and grow instead. This revealed the US-led ‘Anti-ISIL’ Coalition’s real motivations, not in containing ISIS, but actually helping it – in the hopes that the terror scourge could help Washington in its regime change goals to overthrow Syrian presidentBashar al Assad and turn Syria into a Libyan hell-hole repeat. As Turkey is also a NATO member state, this has raised many important questions about NATO’s general role in the terrorist take-over of the region. Not only this, but the Turkish government has now also been implicated the false flag ‘sarin gas’ chemical weapons attack in Damascus in 2013 – the same event which both the US and UK tried to use in order to pass declarations of war at the time. We can now see how this was just another version of the fake WMD plot which led to the Iraq War in 2003. Before the Paris Attacks erupted, 21WIRE warned that Turkey could be helping to engineer the migrant crisis in order to create a ‘EU’ Hegelian outcome and one which could increase the migration of terrorists into Europe.

The stage is now set for an incredible 2016. We only hope that this list will be shorter, and not longer, this time next year…



.

SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS REAFFIRM COMMITMENT TO PRESERVING THE ENVIRONMENT.





[photo credit: iStock, 2015]
ENCOURAGE ALL MEMBERS TO BE GOOD STEWARDS.

December 03, 2015 | Silver Spring, Maryland USA | ANN Staff |

As world leaders gather in Paris for the 21st United Nations Climate Change Conference, the Seventh-day Adventist Church supports and applauds the efforts of these leaders to come to an agreement to stem the deterioration of our earth due to climate change.

The Seventh-day Adventist Church has long supported responsible stewardship of all God has created and reinforces its belief that we all need to be responsible for the resources He has given us. As early as 1995 the Church issued an official statement on the Environment. The statement reads as follows:

“Seventh-day Adventists believe that humankind was created in the image of God, thus representing God as His stewards, to rule the natural environment in a faithful and fruitful way.

Unfortunately, corruption and exploitation have been brought into the management of the human domain of responsibility. Increasingly men and women have been involved in a megalomaniacal destruction of the earth's resources, resulting in widespread suffering, environmental disarray, and the threat of climate change. While scientific research needs to continue, it is clear from the accumulated evidence that the increasing emission of destructive gasses, the depletion of the protective mantel of ozone, the massive destruction of the American forests, and the so-called greenhouse effect, are all threatening the earth's eco-system.

These problems are largely due to human selfishness and the egocentric pursuit of getting more and more through ever-increasing production, unlimited consumption and depletion of nonrenewable resources. The ecological crisis is rooted in humankind's greed and refusal to practice good and faithful stewardship within the divine boundaries of creation.

Seventh-day Adventists advocate a simple, wholesome lifestyle, where people do not step on the treadmill of unbridled consumerism, goods-getting, and production of waste. We call for respect of creation, restraint in the use of the world's resources, reevaluation of one's needs, and reaffirmation of the dignity of created life.”

We support the efforts of world leaders and all humankind to protect and respect that which has been created by God and entrusted to us.


Source: "Adventist News Network"


.

Saturday, January 02, 2016

Identifying God's True Present Truth



Identifying God's True Present Truth





Published on Dec 29, 2015

The majority of Seventh-day Adventists believe Present Truth is the Doctrines taught by and Given by the authority of the church. Yet, God declares this to be false! Most Seventh-day Adventists know the titles of Present Truth but have never heard how God established Present Truth. This Sermon clearly and distinctly proves how God gave to Seventh-day Adventist Present Truth for 2015 and beyond!

Present Truth Power Over the Delusions — #1 Identifying God's Present Truth — By Pastor Charles Mills — Port St Lucie FL At HIS Vine Free Seventh-day Adventist Church

It is our Prayer that all who want to hear Present Truth will watch our sermons here online. We post presently every week here on our Church Pastor's YouTube Channel the Sabbath Worship Service.

HIS Vine Free Seventh-day Adventist Church is preaching the Historic Message given by God to His people to proclaim to the world for a witness.

We are a Self-Supporting Seventh-day Adventist Church as a member of the International Association of Free Seventh-day Adventists.

.

Friday, January 01, 2016

Jeb Bush: GOP Must Be Inclusive; Can't Insult Its Way To The White House



Updated December 31, 2015   11:55 AM ET

Published December 31, 2015  5:11 AM ET



Listen to the Story


7:11


Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush speaks with NPR's Steve Inskeep on Wednesday in Boston.

POLITICS
Jeb Bush Says Voters' Passions For Trump Will Pass

Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush talks to Steve Inskeep about his vision for the party and explains his immigration policy. While down in the polls, Bush still has a well-financed campaign.


RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:

Jeb Bush is ending a challenging year. The son of a president and brother of a president started 2015 favored to win the Republican presidential nomination.

STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:

Bush ends the year looking differently. When campaign reporters spin out scenarios for who could win, they sometimes neglect to mention him.

What has sustained you these last few months?

JEB BUSH: Well, I've got - I'm not going to stand up and pull them out, but I have a little Jesus in my pocket that I carry with me and some rosary beads. And first and foremost, what sustains me is my faith.

INSKEEP: His faith and his belief that he could make a difference.

BUSH: The possibility of becoming president sustains me in ways that it's hard to describe.

INSKEEP: That possibility is at risk, though the former Florida governor still has money and a big goal. He wants to redirect the energies of his party. Bush talked of this in our year-end interview. He is among the Republicans who planned a new tone for this election until Donald Trump arrived. Trump spoke of walls on the border and keeping out Muslims, and many Republicans flocked to him. For Jeb Bush, the first question is - what went wrong?

BUSH: I would argue that Donald Trump is in fact a creature of Barack Obama. But for Barack Obama, Donald Trump's effect would not be nearly as strong as it is. We're living in a divided country right now, and we need political leaders, rather than continuing to divide us as both President Obama and Donald Trump do, to unite us.

INSKEEP: Your party sponsored a report in 2013. It was described as an autopsy of the election loss in 2012. One of your close advisors, I believe, was one of the authors of that report. Among the many recommendations was that the party needed to be more inclusive...

BUSH: ...Yeah...

INSKEEP: ...More welcoming to people of color, and embrace comprehensive immigration reform. What if it turns out that Republican primary voters just are not willing to go there?

BUSH: Well, look, it's - I think the report is accurate for us to win the election. That was the - their point wasn't how are people feeling, you know, in the primary, their mission was how do we win? It's tough being in exile. It's lonely for now near eight years, and to imagine another eight years or four years with Hillary Clinton as president is something that is unfathomable for most Republicans. So the argument that we need to realize our demography as a nation is changing and we need to make our - we're going to have to change our principles. In fact, I think we need to reestablish them because the Conservative movement is a hopeful, optimistic movement at its best.

INSKEEP: Although aren't you in a situation where, granting that no votes have been cast, but based on the polling in 2015, very large numbers of Republican primary voters don't seem to want to be in that spot you'd like them to be in.

BUSH: Well, they want to win though. And if they have a honest appraisal of how we're going to win - we're not going to win by insulting our way to the presidency. You cannot disparage women, people of disabilities, Mexican-Americans, POWs, Muslims. It's not a strategy for victory. It's a strategy to maintain this divisive kind of culture we're in right now.

INSKEEP: One of your rivals, Ted Cruz, made a joke the other day. It was a joke that spoke, I think, to a serious point. He said that the politically correct term for illegal immigrants now was undocumented Democrats, which speaks, I think, to the Republican suspicion that this is all about registering Democrats, ultimately, making citizens of people who are likely to be Democrats. Democrats have the opposite suspicion that Republicans just want to prevent immigrants from voting. How much of the impasse here is really about that question, the question of political power in the future?

BUSH: It's an interesting point. I don't know what percentage of the gridlock can be related to that. The proposal ought to be, for a Conservative, for the people that are here illegally, a path to legal status. Not a path to citizenship, but a path out from the shadows where you pay a fine, where you learn English, where you work, where you don't commit crimes, you don't receive federal government assistance, and over an extended period of time you earn legal status. That's the answer. The answer isn't to joke, as Senator Cruz apparently did. It's to offer a proposal that will solve the problem.

INSKEEP: And if someone says to you, Governor Bush just doesn't want that person to vote, that's why he's objecting to their citizenship...

BUSH: ...I think it's a question of fairness. I think it's a question of fairness. Why should someone - it's called illegal immigration for a reason. People came here illegally. Why should people gain citizenship by coming here illegally? I just - I don't quite understand why that is such a compelling moral argument.

INSKEEP: So let me ask about an implication of that. You have argued that on immigration and so many other issues, that you are far better positioned for a general election than many of your opponents for the Republican nomination. But Hillary Clinton, if she is the nominee - and you've made it clear in your remarks you believe she will be - no matter who the Republican nominee is, she will still be able to hammer them on this issue. She'd be able to hammer you and say you're against a pathway to citizenship. Aren't you still going to be vulnerable on this in a general election?

BUSH: No, because I have a proven record as it relates to immigrants and immigration, and a tone and a leadership as governor of Florida that defies whatever the attacks will be. As it relates to my reelection effort - when I ran for it in a purple state, I got 60 percent of the Latino vote. I got more Latino votes than I got non-Latino white votes. And there's a reason for that, because I campaigned and I governed in a way that was inclusive. Hillary can talk all she was about the stuff that she wants to do, but her record of accomplishment is quite narrow. She's passed - she was a senator for eight years, I believe, and she passed - three bills became law that she sponsored. One was renaming a highway, one was naming a monument, and one was naming a post office.

INSKEEP: Are you saying you'd tell her you'd never get a pathway to citizenship anyway?

BUSH: I would tell her that I have a proven record as it relates to - I don't need to be lectured to about my commitment to the immigrant communities because I did it.

INSKEEP: I also want to ask about your family, governor, but in a different way, I think, than you've been asked about it in the past. People ask you - will you be different than your brother, how would you be different than your brother...

BUSH: ...Yeah, I have a lot of that...

INSKEEP: ...Questions like that. This is a different question. I'm thinking about the fact that the Bush name, your last name, is in political terms a brand. So can you define it for us? What is the Bush brand?

BUSH: Well, I think the Bush brand, if there is one - I'm not sure people can be created into - we use branding now kind of in a broader context than maybe we're used to. It would be integrity. It would be having a servant's heart. It would be patriotic, loving the country. And in my case, you know - look, I'm a Conservative, but I believe that conservativism needs to be applied in a hopeful, optimistic way. And I think that's another part of the Bush brand that I hope people will be reminded of, that it's a hopeful, optimistic message, not a divisive one.

INSKEEP: Governor, thanks very much.

BUSH: Yeah, happy New Year.

INSKEEP: Happy New Year to you.

Copyright © 2015 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for further information.

NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by a contractor for NPR, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of NPR’s programming is the audio.


Source



P.S.


Jeb Bush on his knees in homage to Ratzinger. 


.
.