Pages

▼

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

O'REILLY, ROSIE, & 911.


O'REILLY, ROSIE, & 9-11 COINCIDENCES


By: DevvyApril 9, 2007


© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com



By now, most Americans have heard of the 911 bombs Rosie O'Donnell has been dropping on a show called The View. I've never wasted a minute of what time I have on this earth watching that show for many reasons, Rosie O'Donnell being at the top of the list. I monitor O'Reilly's show as well as the other factually challenged, partisan mouthpieces on FOX, CNN and MSNBC. Recently O'Donnell has, in her usual loud, bullying manner, began unleashing certain allegations regarding 911 on The View. Instead of bringing forth these allegations in a more civilized fashion with some organization to her presentation, O'Donnell comes off as a raving lunatic. This has launched persistent attacks by O'Reilly, as well as the cacophony of shrill rodomontade from Joe Scarborough and other cable anchors. Most of the ranting by these anchors has not truthfully represented what O'Donnell didn't say and they should be held accountable, as O'Reilly himself spouts so often on his spin zone show.
O'Reilly has been demanding ABC shut her up because he says she is allowed free speech, but not "irresponsible speech." Others have demanded she be taken out and shot, as in executed. Many are demanding ABC fire her. A considerable number of voices can't understand why ABC would allow O'Donnell to spew such "conspiracy theories." I can answer that one: In regards to 911, O'Donnell delivered the right message, but has peppered it with other trash talk which makes her credibility factor zero, i.e., "Don't fear the terrorists. They're mothers and fathers." O'Donnell is the classic example of destroy the messenger, kill the message and she walked right into the trap. Why should ABC pull her off the air? Because of who she is and her base constituency, the powers that be figure no sane person will listen to her, the message gets mangled along the way and the bad guys score another point. This time, they may have miscalculated.
O'Reilly has literally screeched over O'Donnell's questioning of the government's conspiracy theory about 911: fire brought down the World Trade Center Towers, Building 7 and so on. In his attacks against O'Donnell, O'Reilly has darn near lost it on several occasions, but in one rant he says, and I'm paraphrasing, that O'Donnell is doing tremendous harm to the families, how hurt they must be when they hear her conspiracy theories. Here's a news flash for O'Reilly: Contrary to what you want people to think, Bill, there are plenty of family members who lost loved ones that day who flat out do not believe the government's conspiracy theories, i.e., Bill Doyle, whose son, Joey Doyle died that day:
Article 8/6/05: "I honestly don't believe the government story," said Doyle, adding everything about the official story and the follow-up investigation has not lived up to his or most all the other victims and survivors expectations. "The 9/11 Commission report doesn't even begin to get at the truth. What we really need is an entire new investigation to answer all the questions not answered by the 9/11 Commission," said Doyle, who is urging all Americans to support the victims and family members in fighting for this cause. "I've heard so many stories from whistle blowers, compelling stories that need to be told that have been silenced by the government and the media."
I suppose Mr. Doyle is just another holocaust denier because anyone asking reasonable questions about 911 is branded with that hot label by the biggest of the flame throwers, Bill O'Reilly and Shallow Shawn Hannity. Michelle Malkin, chimed in on O'Reilly's show last week with another canard when she said, and again I'm paraphrasing: "One only has to read the book, Debunking 911 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts to see that O'Donnell and these other conspiracy theorists are crazy." Of course, this GOP brown noser forgot to mention a thoroughly documented book out by David Ray Griffin titled, Debunking 9/11 Debunking. Had Ms. Malkin bothered to even take a cursory look at this book, she would know her next meal would be crow:
"9/11 and the Evidence" By Paul Craig Roberts. 03/27/07 --- Professor David Ray Griffin is the nemesis of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory. In his latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin destroys the credibility of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Popular Mechanics reports, annihilates his critics, and proves himself to be a better scientist and engineer than the defenders of the official story."
Personally, I can't stomach Rosie O'Donnell or anything she stands for and promotes. Her comments about terrorists being just moms and dads is so loony, it defies logic. If O'Donnell really wants to become credible on the subject, she needs to tone down her rhetoric, stick to the known facts and ask reasonable questions in a responsible fashion. It is being reported that O'Donnell is in tentative talks with Dr. Steven Jones to appear on her program and that would be a stellar day. Dr. Jones will bring the truth to the world without being shouted down, which is exactly what every guest on O'Reilly or Hannity & Colmes has been subjected to regarding questioning the government's conspiracy theories about that day.
O'Reilly's rants also include him being incredulous over O'Donnell's comments that governments run what are called "false flag operations." If the subject matter weren't so serious, the expressions on his face would be hilarious because any serious researcher of history and world events knows they are very real and deadly. O'Reilly, a former fluff and puff host of Inside Addition, acts like the very idea of a "false flag operation" by our government is, well, it's attacking mom, apple pie and baseball! Here is a United States Congressman telling the American people what a false flag operation means:
“The truth is that Iran, like Iraq, is a third-world nation without a significant military. Nothing in history hints that she is likely to invade a neighboring country, let alone America or Israel. I am concerned, however, that a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.” Congressman Ron Paul, [R-TX] and presidential candidate. You can view the video of his speech from January 2007 here. Ron Paul brings out the fact that the CIA says Iran is at ten years away from producing a nuclear bomb and has no delivery system. Got that, Bush and Cheney? He's worried that a false flag operation will drag America into yet another mess, this time with Iran. I suppose in O'Reilly's world, Ron Paul is just another conspiracy wacko and holocaust denier. Webster Tarpley is an expert on false flag operations and has written on the subject extensively. One of his tomes is titled 911 Synthetic Terrorism Made in USA. It is available for free on the Internet. I have read the entire thing and it is well worth the time; see here. Perhaps O'Reilly should spend some time doing real research. As for what comes next with the O'Donnell punch out with O'Reilly, stay tuned.
Mark Cuban has been another target of O'Reilly. Mr. Cuban owns the Dallas Mavericks and has reached an agreement with Charlie Sheen to distribute a DVD titled Loose Change to movie theaters. The prevailing comments in the hundreds of e-mails I've received on this is how wonderful it is that a billionaire like Cuban has "joined the 911 truth movement." Let me clarify this for you: Mark Cuban is simply providing the financing, but he does not believe the contents of that film: "I don't believe the movie. Not at all," Mr. Cuban explained. "But I do believe that lies in the shadows are far more dangerous than lies you can confront and refute. There probably will be a movie that responds to this one, and we would be more than happy to distribute it as well, for the very same reason."
For the record: Loose Change is an excellent presentation with one exception in my humble opinion: their segment on Flight 93. What they present as fact regarding Flight 93 cannot be supported by any credible documentation; Mayor White's press release was a mistake in the heat of the overwhelming chaos that day. If you've read my columns on Flight 93, I firmly believe it flew over Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport and continued on its way. There is too much credible data from pilots who saw and tracked Flight 93 that day who had no reason to lie; they had it in their sights. One question I still have - because I know the county coroner, Wallace Miller lied to me during our interview - is why are the remains collected in Shanksville from the crash site are being held in boxes in an undisclosed location? Perhaps testing would show missile residue.
There are a thousand unanswered questions about 911 and here's two more examples of "coincidence." The passengers of Flight 77. Much speculation exists about whether or not Flight 77 hit the Pentagon and if it didn't, where is it? I don't have the answer except to say that there were some strange things going on at the time with a white plane flying over the Pentagon and White House. The mysterious white plane is one thing I distinctly remember from that day and the reporting about it. If you read Dr. Olmsted's essays on the passengers of Flight 77 (I've covered this before), obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests, you can see there were no Arabs (these would be the hijackers) on the flight manifesto or in the morgue. However there certainly were a number of highly placed folks from the defense/intelligence industry on Flight 77. The theory is that a Global Hawk (Raytheon) or something similar actually hit the Pentagon; let's look at some of the passengers as researched by Dr. Olmsted:
Dong Lee, Ruben Ornedo, and Chad Keller, worked for Boeing. Lee worked for the NSA. Stanley Hall, "the dean of electronic warfare," (along with Peter Gay, David Kolvacin, and Kenneth Waldie on other flights), worked for Raytheon.
William Caswell was a particle physicist who worked for the Navy. His job was so classified that his family had no clue as to what he did and did not know why he was flying to California.
Charles Droz, LCDR USN Ret, was a software developer for EM solutions (manufacturer of Wide Area Networks).
Robert Penniger worked for BAE Systems, ("an industry leader in flight control systems"), whose Board is comprised of many from the intelligence community. BAE has apparently removed their Board of Directors page, but it list a "who's who" of high level connections to the CIA, DARPA, and NSA. (See the appendix for a list of outside directors of BAE Systems that were not on Flight 77.)
Robert Ploger, son of Major General Robert R Ploger USA, Ret, another "flag" link. (He worked at Lockheed Martin for 20 years.)
John Sammartino and Leonard Taylor worked at Xontech (missile defense), another company connected to the intelligence community, also with ties to Boeing.
Vicki Yancey worked for Vreedenberg Corp, yet another company connected to the intelligence community. Her father describes her death as a "planned murder." Her widower works for Northrup-Grumman.
Mary Jane Booth was in a position to know what was going on at Dulles Airport as secretary for American Airlines general manager. AA Flight 77 originated from Dulles.
John Yamnicky, 71, Capt USN Ret, was a defense contractor for Veridian who had done a number of "black ops," according to his son.
Let me add one more: Bryan Jack, considered a brilliant mathematician. As head of programming and fiscal economics in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, he was a top budget analyst. He had worked at the Pentagon 23 years. Recall this fact: "Rumsfeld Buries Admission of Missing 2+ Trillion Dollars in 9/10/01 Press Conference. "On September 10, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld held a press conference to disclose that over $2,000,000,000,000 in Pentagon funds could not be accounted for. Rumsfeld stated: "According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions." Such a disclosure normally would have sparked a huge scandal. However, the commencement of the attack on New York City and Washington in the morning would assure that the story remained buried. To the trillions already missing from the coffers, an obedient Congress terrorized by anthrax attacks would add billions more in appropriations to fight the "War on Terror."
Dead witnesses can't be questioned. Another area completely over looked by the dominant media, but I feel is connected to 911, is the cluster of convenient deaths of top notch microbiologists. Just a brief recap of these strange deaths:
November 12, 2001, Dr. Benito Que, a cell biologist working on infectious diseases like HIV, who was found dead outside his laboratory at the Miami Medical School. Police say his death was possibly the result of a mugging by four "thugs" with a baseball bat. Boca Raton is 40 miles north of Miami. It is the location of the first anthrax attacks at the AMI building. The first anthrax death occurred in Boca Raton on October 4, 2001. I'm sure it's just a coincidence.
November 16, 2001, within of week of Dr. Que's assault, Dr. Don C Wiley, one of the United States foremost infectious disease researchers was declared missing; Dr. Wiley was known around the world for his work. His body washes up December 20, 2001, in the Mississippi River about 300 miles south of Memphis. His field of research (short list): Structural Biology, immune response, immune system, immunology, autoimmune disease, autoimmunity, HIV-1, Ebola, Hong Kong Influenza virus, x-ray crystallography, HRSV, IDDM, virus.
November 23, 2001, Dr. Vladimir Pasechnik, a former microbiologist for Biopreparat, the Soviet biological-weapons production facility was found dead in England. In the last few weeks of his life he had put his research on anthrax at the disposal of the Government, in the light of the threat from bioterrorism.
December 10, 2001, Dr. Robert M. Schwartz was found murdered in Leesburg, Virginia. A well-known biophysicist, who was one of the leading researchers on DNA sequencing analysis; he was also involved in other benign activities.
December 14, 2001, a skilled microbiologist was killed at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation's animal diseases facility in Geelong, Australia: Set Van Nguyen. This is the same facility that, as the journal Nature announced in January this year: "Australian scientists, Dr Ron Jackson and Dr Ian Ramshaw, accidentally created an astonishingly virulent strain of mousepox, a cousin of smallpox, among laboratory mice. They realised that if similar genetic manipulation was carried out on smallpox, an unstoppable killer could be unleashed." I believe Dr. Ian Ramshaw was the real target and Van Nguyen was killed by mistake.

Their work was partially funded by the U.S. government, some in part, some in whole. Dead microbiologists can ask no questions - especially about the anthrax attacks. The above is just the short list because if you go to the links below, you'll see for a couple of years following 911 it was open season on microbiologists. Most important is fields of interlocking expertise and the timing. I have given this subject very thorough research and did one on site investigation, Dr. Tanya Holzmayer's murder. Call it a conspiracy theory if you want, I call it too many coincidences.

I know these deaths are all connected to 911, I just don't have the financial resources to prove it and not one single so called investigative journalist or reporter, including Mark Furhman, would even have the common courtesy to let me know they're not interested in pursuing these murders. As I said at the end of my last 911 column, this is a complicated, incestuous stew pot of players, motives, means and opportunity. The only way the truth is going to be exposed is by continued massive pressure from the people of this country who value truth, integrity and the law above party loyalty and fun times.
© 2007 - NewsWithViews.com - All Rights Reserved

Devvy's website: http://www.devvy.com/
E-mail is: devvyk@earthlink.net
at

No comments:

Post a Comment