Photo: Alberto Rivera (ex-Jesuit) in a Chick Publications Comics.
IS THE ADVENTIST DENOMINATION INFILTRATED BY THE JESUITS OF ROME??
Most definitely, most positively, most absolutely!!
Statement:
We have seen on the Jesuit Infiltration website that despots usually first approach their victims expressing a desire to have all kinds of free opinions on virtually every subject flying around. This is biblically called "confusion," so to get away with it, they have to substitute another name to make it look palatable to their victims. They therefore chose the word "DIVERSITY." That way while debating, they can infiltrate positions of power which will give the last word on changes that must be enforced against the people.
A short time afterward they will push for changes and would attack the doctrine of the church in subtle ways. Of course, people will try to warn the members about any such attempts. When that is done, Jesuits would naturally do what they can to censor and prevent the people from being warned.
Question:
Did the leadership of the Adventist Church do this? Did they encourage all kinds of diverse opinions and pretended to be wishy-washy?
Answer:
Just check the issues of the Adventist Review since the late '80s and you will get the quick answer for this question.
Question:
Did the Adventist leadership censor out the views of those who opposed having the church refashioned to a different and not fully explained shape?
[We mention "not fully explained shape" because even in the changes with the Celebration Worship Style, they were telling us that they didn't know the outcome. They told us we must accept the changes, and then "wait and see." Most people do not know that this is completely Catholic principle. Protestantism forbade venturing out into unknowns that could not be documented by the scriptures. If the outcome could not be already seen with the scriptures, no movement or endeavor was to be enacted. See the evidence at this webpage.]
Answer:
She most certainly did! The literature of the Adventist Church encouraged confusion. She detailed that there were at least three classes of Adventist constituency: the liberals, the evangelicals and the traditionalists. She stated that all three of these classes were equally justified in their views, and that no one out of any of these classes should be uppity enough to claim that his or her views were correct for the church. She was therefore opposed by the Independent Ministries.
The interesting thing was that the Independent Ministries were composed wholly of only one of the mentioned classes: that class which they called, "The Traditionalists." While claiming to be neutral and desirous of diversity, the leaders made a relentless and continuing stealthy war against "The Traditionalists" most exclusively.
Therefore, although she claimed to host all opinions, the material of the Adventist Church hosted one type of endeavor or opinion while the Independent Ministry material hosted something completely different. You couldn't find opinions nor literature in the denomination that you found in the Independent Ministries even though she claimed to host all beliefs fairly. Even though the denomination claimed what a formidable threat the Independent Ministries were to her tithe revenues therefore demonstrating their popularity, all her literature, instead of hosting an unbiased view of the Independent Ministries, wholly condemned them continually not caring who still within the denomination disagreed. The Adventist Church saw that they were very popular. By her own words she was supposed to host the views of those who support what they are doing, as well as those who do not. THIS WAS NOT DONE! C. Mervyn Maxwell, in a lengthy letter to Elder Robert Dale of the North American Division documented the abuses that were done clear under the noses of the Adventist people. Click on the link and see the startling evidence!
Question:
Did honest Adventists warn the church leadership that they were taking an unbiblical approach by telling the membership that all kinds of different opinions about the church doctrine was desirable and even mandatory?
Answer:
Yes.
Question:
What was the usual reply of these leaders?
Answer:
These leaders often published everywhere accusations that those who told them this were merely intent on "pushing their own self-made, half-made pre-packaged opinions upon the church." For wanting the standing order of the church to continue, these people were so CRITICIZED by those preaching against the "critical spirit." The Adventist leadership had no respect for those who disagreed, and they prevented those who disagreed from publishing their concerns. They told them that this was a complete community now and that they cannot tell the whole body that they must succumb to their views.
Question:
Logically, what would be the result of compliance to this principle of diversity?
Answer:
People rising up with their honest beliefs and forming independent ministries demonstrating their views of what Adventism should be like if such views are suppressed as they are in fact.
Question:
Under the rules prescribed by the denomination, what is supposed to be their attitude over such results?
Answer:
They are supposed to welcome it, if indeed they were telling us the truth about the blessings of diversity in freedom.
Question:
What was their reaction?
Answer:
Well we all know that they instituted a trademark policy with the name of Adventism in order for them to acquire the power to sue those who would think to arrive at a different view of Adventism than they and therefore oppose the forced Catholic changes that would naturally ultimately be determined to be a mandate.
Question:
From whence did they acquire such power?
Answer:
Certainly not from focusing on Christ which they encourage the members to do. The members were more encouraged to focus only on Christ and celebrate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in order to prevent them from interrupting the treason. According to the plot, only one group of people are supposed to be allowed to think, plan and operate: the Adventist leadership and pastors in the conspiracy. ALL OF THESE are Jesuit tactics!!
Question:
What is the leadership now attempting to do?
Answer:
They are attempting to make the church ecumenical and ecumenically minded. Whether you know it or not or like it or not, it is most likely the case that your children are being taught to like ecumenism in our educational institutions. They forced in the Celebration movement upon the church by actually constructing a worship style! They pushed this upon all the churches IN ALL CULTURES starting about around 1987. They then told us the lie that acceptance of this "style" was a matter of culture, and then forced that one worship style upon all cultures. ONLY PAPISTS CAN DO THIS!! This is blasphemy in the highest degree!! Even God did not construct and formulate worship and then force it on His subjects. All those who participated gave special honor and worship to the originators!
See more proof that the Adventist denomination is infiltrated by the Jesuits in the following links!
Our Hazels: More Proof of Infiltration Into the SDA Denominational Structure!
The Secret of the Omega Symbol from the Vision of Ellen White Concerning our Church at the End Time!
END
Arsenio, This is good stuff.
ReplyDeleteMaybe this link should be added:
http://theirmanygods.blogspot.com/2009/03/professor-walter-j-veith-corruption-of.html
Tataryn