Pages

Friday, January 29, 2010

Catholic Bishops Lobby for ObamaCare, Amnesty for Illegals


Photo (Courtesy)
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjym6WeC5mGqxAcJEe1_q9F_Kxe8WRbv10O-5HxaM6Gg4nYTkXDTcd7gqmg3RaAWm7NF5Qa4khj2f8xzaF0e9AnIpRJXJB7OXSYs-BjpbXQT_QIH7tRJBI0puSFGRVwon7tT8oSIQ/s1600/capt.675f816030cc462799476aa7ddde503d.catholic_bishops_mdrc102.jpg


AIM Column By Cliff Kincaid January 27, 2010

The religious left, led by the Catholic Bishops, may represent the only way that liberals in Congress can ultimately succeed in passing ObamaCare.

Calling health care a "right" to be guaranteed by the federal government, America's Catholic Bishops are trying to save ObamaCare at a time when the legislation has been pronounced in limbo, dying or dead by most of the media.

The evidence of intensive Catholic Bishop lobbying activity suggests that liberal Congressional leaders are going to give the legislation a temporary respite so that liberal Catholics can be persuaded to pressure Congress to pass both national health care legislation and "comprehensive immigration reform" in the form of H.R. 4321, the "Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity" Act.

As AIM has documented, lobbying by the Catholic Bishops and their representatives, who worked closely with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, guaranteed passage of the health care bill in the House.

In a January 13 conference call and briefing, Kevin Appleby, a representative of the U.S. Catholic Bishops, explained in frank language why the Bishops are so desperate to pass the health care and immigration bills. He said that the Bishops want a federal health plan to absorb the costs being borne by the nation's 600 Catholic hospitals to cover illegal aliens.

Appleby said, "We have Catholic hospitals throughout the country that experience the same things that Alan was describing and we serve undocumented immigrants in our emergency rooms and community clinics, etc. So we have a stake in this in that the burden will fall not just on our providers but as Alan described, taxpayers throughout the country."

This was one of the clearest indications yet that support for national health care legislation is a means by which the Bishops can dump some of the costs of operating Catholic hospitals on the American taxpayers.

The reference to "Alan" was to Alan Aviles, president of the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, another person on the telephone conference call.

Just four days after the annual January 22 March for Life, which featured many Catholic Bishops standing shoulder-to-shoulder with conservative members of Congress against President Obama's pro-abortion policies, the Bishops have returned to their liberal ways, firing off a letter to Congress complaining that national health care bills pending in the House and Senate aren't far-reaching enough. While the Bishops want the ultimate legislation to include "prohibitions on abortion funding," they also want it expanded to include millions of more people, including illegal aliens.

Indeed, the Bishops say in their January 26 letter that the House and Senate bills should be expanded because they "leave between 18 and 23 million people in our nation without health insurance."

In addition, the Bishops openly state in their letter that they want "undocumented persons"--illegal aliens--to be able to purchase insurance in the new health care exchange established by the federal government.

Gabino Zavala, an auxiliary bishop in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles for the San Gabriel region, has written an article noting that the religious left, which he describes as "religious leaders and faith-based organizations," have been pushing for a national health care system "for decades." He adds, "Catholic bishops have been leading advocates for universal health care as a fundamental human right, not simply a luxury for the privileged few."

The religious left, led by the Catholic Bishops, may represent the only way that liberals in Congress can ultimately succeed in passing ObamaCare. But that assumes that conservative Catholics will not resist the push to use church resources to give amnesty and federal benefits to illegal aliens as a way to take Catholic hospitals off the hook for many of their health care costs.

Left-wing Huffington Post blogger John Gehring notes with pride and pleasure that the Catholic bishops have "signaled they will play a leading role in pushing for comprehensive immigration reform this year by using the power of their pulpits and bipartisan political influence on Capitol Hill" and that the recent briefing was designed "to outline plans for persuading the public and wavering members of Congress that fixing a broken immigration system is a moral and practical priority."

Gehring is Communications Director and Senior Writer for Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good, an organization funded by atheist George Soros. He is also a regular contributor to the God's Politics blog run by Jim Wallis of Sojourners, which received $100,000 from the Soros Open Society Institute to support the "Christians for Immigration Reform" campaign.

That briefing in question was the January 13 "Turning a New Leaf in Health Care Reform" conference call that included a lot of discussion about how to revive and save health care legislation in Congress and pass immigration legislation as well. The call featured Jennifer Ng'andu, Deputy Director of the Health Policy Project at the National Council of La Raza; Sonal Ambegaokar, a health policy attorney at the National Immigration Law Center; Alan Aviles; and Kevin Appleby, whose official title is Director of Migration and Policy Services at the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops.

An audio recording and transcript of the conference call are available at the La Raza website.

The Huffington Post's Gehring said that Bishop John C. Wester of Salt Lake City and Bishop Howard Hubbard of Albany, New York, who are respective chairmen of the U.S. bishops' committees on migration and international policy, have announced that over a million postcards "touting the need for immigration reform have been ordered by dioceses and parishes across the country" and that the cards will be sent to congressional offices.

The campaign is being run by the Justice for Immigrants campaign, an official project of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

The pre-written postcards say, "I am a concerned constituent and agree with the U.S. Catholic bishops that the U.S. immigration system is broken and is in need of repair. I ask that this year you support immigration reform legislation that keeps immigrant families together, adopts smart and humane enforcement policies, and ensures that immigrants without legal status register with the government and begin a path toward citizenship. Our families and communities cannot wait!"

The phrase "without legal status" means, of course, being illegal. It means they broke the law to enter the United States.

But the Bishops don't seem to want members of their flock to understand this critical fact.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at cliff.kincaid@aim.org




Source: http://www.aim.org/aim-column/catholic-bishops-lobby-for-obamacare-amnesty-for-illegals/
.

3 comments:

  1. Why you may ask do the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops espouse such militant views on Universal Healthcare, and amnesty for Illegal aliens?
    Why do they attempt to impose their 'divine' agenda covertly, and openly promote their views on these issues?

    Let me just point out that the Roman Catholic Church by virtue of its "apostolic succession", and its "Infallibility" dogmas considers itself the administrator (conscience) of human beings, and all earthly resources; It also considers itself 'the' ultimate authority on sacred as well as secular issues; The holy see's name implies Universal (Apostolic Roman Catholic) influence and power:

    The Roman Pontiff, head of the college of bishops, enjoys this infallibility in virtue of his office, when, as supreme pastor and teacher of all the faithful--who confirms his brethren in the faith (cf. Lk. 22:32)--he proclaims in an absolute decision a doctrine pertaining to faith or morals.[42] For that reason his definitions are rightly said to be irreformable by their very nature and not by reason of the assent of the Church, is as much as they were made with the assistance of the Holy Spirit promised to him in the person of blessed Peter himself; and as a consequence they are in no way in need of the approval of others, and do not admit of appeal to any other tribunal. For in such a case the Roman Pontiff does not utter a pronouncement as a private person, but rather does he expound and defend the teaching of the Catholic faith as the supreme teacher of the universal Church, in whom the Church's charism of infallibility is present in a singular way. http://mirrorofjustice.blogs.com/mirrorofjustice/2005/03/the_teaching_au.html

    You may want to acquaint yourselves with the RCC's definition of the "Magesterium". It's what I believe gives the pope and the bishops, the Vatican, and the worldwide church it's authority. I believe this is why the U.S. Catholic Bishops forcefully promote legislation despite the ramifications of a violation of the separation of church and state ethic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Roman Catholic Church considers health care one of the most fundamental rights of human beings around the world. To Catholics, the “right to life” is not just meant for the unborn, but instead, for a person’s entire lifetime, even down to their last moments. The dignity of the person is nothing short of a pillar of Catholic social teaching that dictates so much of the Church’s public policy perspective. http://healthcarehorserace.com/activism/07272009/the-roman-catholic-church-and-health-care-reform/

    In regards to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops advocacy for amnesty for illegal aliens or undocumented persons, I would make reference to the massive influxes of Catholics from Ireland, Italy (and Sicily), Poland, Germany, other "Latin" countries in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Can there be any wonder on who may have facilitated such mass migrations? Emma Lazarus? ("Give me your tired, your poor,. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free)...
    Previously the continent had been primarily Protestant, but, with the arrival of these Roman Catholics (and Jews) the nature of the country changed. Now a new wave of Catholics from south of the border has crossed the border. The Catholic Church believes that there is no such thing as national boundaries when it comes to restricting her flock of adherents. I must admit that the new illegals from Mexico and Central America are very devoted disciples of the virgin mary which is a central pillar of Catholic theology (Maryology or Marytology). With all these facts in mind; of course, the "Bishops" want to "normalize" these lay people. The Catholic Church through its Bulls, Decrees, Edicts, Canons, etc., will rationalize the need to defend all its members through its teaching of Social Justice, or Natural Law. To comprehend these assertions it will be necessary to examine some of the following documents:

    Rerum Novarum (On the Condition of Workers)
    Quadragesimo Anno (On the Reconstruction of the Social Order)
    Gaudium et Spes (Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World)
    Populorum Progressio (On the Development of Peoples)
    Pastoral Letter on Mexico (United States Bishops' Conference)
    Last but not least: Caritas in Veritate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, to understand the position of the Bishops we must examine the definition of these concepts: Agrarian Reform, Wealth Redistribution, Distributism (Third Way), and "Common Good".

    Pius XII, Christ's vicar (1939-1958) in a world beginning to experience explosive population growth and unprecedented mobility, became the first Pontiff to affirm an explicit, though conditional, 'right' to migrate

    Pope John XXIII, also voiced the emerging doctrine of 'just reasons' for immigration

    Every human being has the right to freedom of movement and of residence within the confines of his own country; and, when there are just reasons for it, the right to emigrate to other countries and take up residence there (Pacem in Terris).

    The right to emigrate was enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which does not, however, contain any right of immigration

    Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

    Article 14. (1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution. (2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc0302/article_228.shtml

    Let's not forget that the U.N., the globalists, socialists, and humanists around the world "are kindred spirits" with the Vatican,; They mysteriously see all things see things "through rose colored glasses".

    I just thought I'd point those factors out in case some people were ignorant why the Bishops act the way they do.

    Arsenio,

    Maranatha.

    ReplyDelete