Spain: 70% of migrants in Ceuta are claiming to be homosexuals...

Spain: 70% of migrants in Ceuta are claiming to be homosexuals in recent asylum applications

Homosexuality is illegal in Morocco

Last updated: October 19, 2026 22:00

By - Remix News Staff -

Spanish police sources say roughly 70 percent of recent asylum applications filed by Moroccan migrants in the North African enclave of Ceuta now claim persecution based on their homosexuality, a sharp change from the economic motives cited in the weeks after a large irregular entry in late July.

The report from Spanish newspaper ABC, citing Spanish National Police sources, also indicated that about 95 percent of the applications under review involve Moroccan nationals, and of those already decided, the rejection rate is estimated at about 99 percent.

Police have knowledge of at least 19 favorable decisions for people who entered during the July episode; five of those rested on sexual-orientation grounds.

The Unified Police Union (SUP) representative in Ceuta, Raúl Piera, told local media the share citing homosexuality has risen as high as 90 percent in the most recent filings. Applicants initially mentioned unemployment, family reunification or other reasons, he said.

After word circulated that economic grounds were unlikely to succeed, the accounts shifted.

“At first, they were not informed and did not know what they should say. But word spread,” Piera said.

Police sources have also raised the possibility that some applicants received advice, including from NGOs, on which grounds might improve their chances. While no fraud has been proven, the overwhelming amount of applications based on claims of homosexuality raises various red flags about the asylum application process.

Same-sex sexual relations are criminalized in Morocco under Article 489 of the penal code, which provides for prison terms of six months to three years. Spanish and European rules treat a well-founded fear of persecution on grounds of sexual orientation as a potential basis for protection.

Declaring oneself homosexual is not sufficient, however. Authorities examine the consistency of each account, personal circumstances and the risk upon return through interviews and documentation.

Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska, speaking in Ceuta, said a mere allegation is not enough: there must be “a principle of objective and clear proof” and “a minimum of serious evidence.”

Nearly 1,200 international-protection applications have been formalized since the late-July arrivals, of which roughly 700 have been resolved, according to government figures. An estimated 10,000 of those who crossed on July 30-31 remain in Ceuta, some in informal housing or remote areas. Many others have returned to Morocco voluntarily or through other processes.

The asylum claims continue to be assessed individually by the Office of Asylum and Refuge. Rejection does not automatically result in immediate removal; applicants must be notified, and some may abscond or challenge decisions in court, though the share pursuing judicial appeals has been described as very low.

Source

The Overton Window: How Ideas Become Acceptable Without Anyone Noticing

blac

Oct 8, 2026

There's an idea that, right now, would end a career if you said it out loud. 

Nobody proposes it. Nobody defends it. But ideas like this don't always stay 

that way.

The Overton Window is the range of ideas a society considers acceptable to 

say in public. It doesn't move because someone wins an argument. It moves 

because the furthest edge keeps shifting outward, and everything behind it 

gets pulled along, one small step at a time.

Part of an ongoing series on the psychology of belief, compliance, and 

manipulation.

The science of what screens do to your brain

CARAVAN HEADS TO U.S. | 600+ migrants head to U.S.-Mexico border from Honduras

THE DEVILS PSYOPS ARE IN THE DETAILS! CONVERSE KKK LYNCHING AD IS FREEMASON DIVIDE & CONQUER 101!

Are Financial Crises Being Used to Build a Cashless Control System

The BANNED Interview That Warned Us All

The BANNED Interview That Warned Us All

Be Inspired

May 5, 2026

A Propaganda Expert Predicted 2026 In 1984. Every Word Came True. 

►Copyright ©: 

Script - BE INSPIRED 

Narration - BE INSPIRED 

Footage is licensed through Videoblocks, Artgrid, and Envato. 

Music: Epidemic Sound / Audiojungle / Envato Elements Interviews / Video References were used under FAIR USE LAW. 

© BE INSPIRED - All rights reserved

Bellarmine – Champion of Rome

The Jesuit cardinal Robert Bellarmine (1542-1621), the 400th anniversary of whose death is noticed in 2021, was the greatest polemical theologian, controversialist and defender of the Papacy that the Church of Rome ever produced. Whereas the Council of Trent (1545-1563) dogmatically defined the doctrine of the Church of Rome in a series of decrees and anathemas, it fell to Bellarmine to provide all the theological underpinnings and, by controversy, to counter every argument of Protestantism, whether Lutheran, Calvinist or whatever. He did so principally by his lectures to young Jesuits training to be the foot soldiers of the Counter-Reformation, and by his printed Controversies. Bellarmine also produced a catechism that was adopted by the Roman Catholic Church as its official teaching until the First Vatican Council in 1870, which relied heavily on Bellarmine’s arguments in favour of Papal infallibility.[1] He was declared by Rome a Doctor of the Church in 1931, the prerequisite to which was his canonization as a saint the previous year.

The Protestant Reformers had studied the Scriptures in their original languages, and deeply familiarized themselves with church history and the writings of the Church Fathers, but there was little comparable expertise within the Church of Rome: few Roman apologists until Bellarmine could argue convincingly from history, or from the Fathers, or from the original languages, leaving the Church of Rome at a significant disadvantage in controversy. A milestone in modern history was the production of the Historia Ecclesiae Christi by Lutheran scholars at Magdeburg (1559-74), thirteen volumes covering a century each, often known as the Magdeburg Centuries. Painstakingly and meticulously researched using primary sources from all over Europe, the Magdeburg Centuries demonstrated the continuity in all ages of the Church and her doctrine in each article of faith. This made it relatively easy for Protestants to expose and counter the errors in the traditional narrative of the Roman church with its mediaeval legends, inventions, hagiographies, and forgeries.[2]

Roberto Francesco Romolo Bellarmino was born on October 4, 1542 in the town of Montepulciano in Tuscany, then within the Papal States. He was the third of five sons, and had seven sisters. His maternal uncle, Cardinal Marcello Cervini, hailed from the town, and became Pope Marcellus II when Robert was 12. In 1557 Spanish Jesuits set up a school in the town, which attracted away Robert from the local grammar school. Robert quickly came under their spell to join the order, contrary to the will of his father, who wished him to qualify in medicine. In an extraordinary circumvention of the requirement for a 2-year noviciate, Robert was fast-tracked into taking vows at the age of seventeen. Within days Robert was fitted with his cassock and dispatched to the Jesuits’ Roman College in Rome. He became Il Maestro Roberto at 21, and thereafter taught at Florence, then at Mondovi in Piedmont, and at Padua, all the while honing his skills in preaching.

In 1569 Bellarmine was sent to Louvain in the Low Countries, where he distinguished himself by regular preaching and public lectures in Latin, his auditors exceeding 2000 persons at a time.[3] Louvain was a Roman Catholic stronghold in a region much influenced by Protestantism, and his Jesuit superiors knew that there he could in relative safety cut his teeth in controversy. The main dispute when he arrived was an intramural affair at the University, where Michael de Bay (Latin ‘Baius’), who had attended the Council of Trent as a theologian delegate, taught that Roman theology had become too reliant on mediaeval scholasticism and the writings of Thomas Aquinas. Baius records that he ‘endeavoured to bring theology back to Holy Scripture and the writings of the Fathers’, which sounded suspiciously like the trail that the Reformers had blazed. Unsurprisingly, Baius’ views were condemned by a Papal Bull and yet rumbled on.[4] The Jesuits, disliking any sympathy at the University for what they considered crypto-Protestantism, set up their own college in Louvain in 1570 and installed the recently ordained Bellarmine as its first professor, where he dutifully lectured and wrote against the views of Baius, while avoiding mention of his name. His star in controversy being in the ascendant, but now ailing in health and troubled by regional wars, Bellarmine was recalled to Rome in 1576 to take up the chair of Controversial Theology at the Roman College, where he had once trained. He served successively as lecturer, then as Spiritual Father of the college (1588), and at length its Rector (1592).

Gnostic Religion Is Manipulating Our Society (Singularity Exposed)

PROGRAMMING THE NATION _ Subliminal Messages to the Masses

Jesuit Theater Of Control: Manipulation Faith, Politics and Perception | Audiobook

Jesuit Theater Of Control: Manipulation Faith, Politics and Perception | Audiobook

The Real Reveal

Apr 6, 2026

This audiobook pulls back the curtain on a world where faith, power, and performance intersect. Across five chapters, Jesuit Theatre of Control explores how theatre, symbolism, spectacle, and narrative have been used throughout history to shape belief, influence societies, and reinforce authority. What begins in the Counter-Reformation—with elaborate Jesuit stage productions and emotionally charged religious drama—extends into Inquisition trials, manufactured miracles, and ultimately into the modern world of cinema and global media.

A religion of externals is attractive to the unrenewed heart.

Many Protestants suppose that the Catholic religion is unattractive and that its worship is a dull, meaningless round of ceremony. Here they mistake. While Romanism is based upon deception, it is not a coarse and clumsy imposture. The religious service of the Roman Church is a most impressive ceremonial. Its gorgeous display and solemn rites fascinate the senses of the people and silence the voice of reason and of conscience. The eye is charmed. Magnificent churches, imposing processions, golden altars, jeweled shrines, choice paintings, and exquisite sculpture appeal to the love of beauty. The ear also is captivated. The music is unsurpassed. The rich notes of the deep-toned organ, blending with the melody of many voices as it swells through the lofty domes and pillared aisles of her grand cathedrals, cannot fail to impress the mind with awe and reverence.

This outward splendor, pomp, and ceremony, that only mocks the longings of the sin-sick soul, is an evidence of inward corruption. The religion of Christ needs not such attractions to recommend it. In the light shining from the cross, true Christianity appears so pure and lovely that no external decorations can enhance its true worth. It is the beauty of holiness, a meek and quiet spirit, which is of value with God.

Brilliancy of style is not necessarily an index of pure, elevated thought. High conceptions of art, delicate refinement of taste, often exist in minds that are earthly and sensual. They are often employed by Satan to lead men to forget the necessities of the soul, to lose sight of the future, immortal life, to turn away from their infinite Helper, and to live for this world alone.

A religion of externals is attractive to the unrenewed heart. The pomp and ceremony of the Catholic worship has a seductive, bewitching power, by which many are deceived; and they come to look upon the Roman Church as the very gate of heaven. None but those who have planted their feet firmly upon the foundation of truth, and whose hearts are renewed by the Spirit of God, are proof against her influence. Thousands who have not an experimental knowledge of Christ will be led to accept the forms of godliness without the power. Such a religion is just what the multitudes desire.

The Great Controversy, pp. 566,567.

Markwayne Mullin tells ICE hunger-strikers who want 'ethnic food' to 'go back to their country'

Story by Peter Rubinstein • 11h 

U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat described the conditions at the Newark facility as "inhumane" and vowed to shut the center down (Image: AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

© AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin channeled the same anti-immigrant rhetoric as Trump on Wednesday, claiming that the New Jersey ICE facility detainees on hunger strike are only doing so because they want "ethnic food."

"There was only a handful of individuals that was refusing to eat because they want their ethnic group, or their ethnic-right food. Well, they can go back to their country and get whatever food they want," Mullin said during a televised Cabinet meeting. “The fact is, we’re giving them the calories they want. This isn’t Holiday Inn.”

His comments came after Democratic members of Congress who visited Delaney Hall in Newark said detainees are being given small portions of food that "very often" contain maggots. U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat described the conditions as "inhumane" and vowed to shut the center down.

Protesters have been demonstrating for days and asserting that detainees at the New Jersey facility are on a hunger strike.

U.S. Rep. Jerry Nadler, a Manhattan Democrat, said that the only medication they receive is Tylenol.

The lawmakers addressed protesters and family members of detainees demonstrating outside the facility’s security gate after their visits© Kyle Mazza/Shutterstock

Are They Priming Us For Disclosure?

Jesuit Theater Of Control: Manipulation Faith, Politics and Perception | Audiobook

 

The Influence of Mind on Mind | Our High Calling

Christianity as Rome’s Secret Strategy—And Why It Worked So Well

By Author Julia Davis

Posted onPublished: December 16, 2025

Source: ShutterStock


The church would have us believe that the Emperor Constantine suddenly “found Jesus” and decided to turn his entire empire Christian overnight.

But that might not be the whole truth, and his reasons for accepting the new faith might not have been as pure and honest as they seem.

Christianity has a message of unity and acceptance, and the Romans saw great potential in that.

They had a long and tumultuous history of dealing with conquered peoples, and they knew that brute force wasn’t enough for the Roman influence to truly last.

A Tapestry of Gods and Cultures

© Pexels


The Roman Empire was a melting pot of different cultures and religions. There was a god for every occasion, every city, and every aspect of life.

This strong religious tradition was deeply woven into daily routines and laws.

These were all national cults, and each and every people that the Romans conquered had their own.

The pantheons were a huge part of people’s identity, and no amount of Roman force would get them to give that up.

Not to mention, these conquered peoples loathed the very idea of the Romans, and rejected all that was imposed on them.

But Christianity was not Roman. That’s why the Empire recognized it as the one assimilation strategy that wouldn’t cause outright rebellion.

World Health Organization holds news conference on global health issues

How Birth Tourism Became an 'Industrial-Scale' Weapon of the CCP | Peter Schweizer

 

What does Isaiah 3:12 mean?

What does Isaiah 3:12 mean?

"¶ As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." - Isaiah 3:12

Isaiah 3:12 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible is a verse that reads, "As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths." This verse is found in the book of Isaiah, which is a major prophetical book in the Old Testament. The verse is part of a larger passage in which Isaiah is delivering a message of judgment to the people of Judah.

This verse is a reflection of the moral and social decay that had taken hold of Judah at the time. The prophet laments the fact that the natural order of things has been disrupted, with children oppressing their elders and women ruling over the people. This was a direct result of the spiritual decline of the nation, as their leaders had led them astray and destroyed the way of their paths. The verse is a powerful condemnation of the corruption and moral decay that had taken hold of Judah, and a warning of the consequences that would follow if they did not repent and turn back to God.

One of the key themes of this verse is the idea of leadership and its impact on a society. The verse laments the fact that the leaders of Judah had failed in their duty to guide and protect the people, instead leading them astray and causing them to err. This is a powerful reminder of the importance of wise and righteous leadership, and the impact that it can have on the moral and spiritual health of a nation. It is a call to leaders to fulfill their responsibilities with integrity and righteousness, and a warning of the consequences of leadership that is corrupt or negligent.

Another important theme in this verse is the idea of the breakdown of the natural order. Children oppressing their elders and women ruling over the people are seen as symptoms of the moral and social decay that had taken hold of Judah. This is a reflection of the breakdown of the traditional family structure and the erosion of respect for authority and hierarchy. The verse serves as a warning of the consequences of such social disorder, and a call to return to the values and principles that uphold a healthy and flourishing society.

The context of this verse is also important to consider. Isaiah was a prophet who ministered during a time of great political and social upheaval in Judah. The nation was facing threats from outside powers, as well as internal corruption and moral decay. The message of judgment and warning that Isaiah delivers in this verse is part of a larger prophetic message that he delivered to the people of Judah, calling them to repentance and renewal. The verse is a reflection of the social and moral climate of the time, and a reminder of the consequences of turning away from God.

Symbolism in this verse can also be seen in the imagery of children oppressing their elders and women ruling over the people. These are seen as symbols of the breakdown of the natural order and the erosion of traditional values and authority. The image of children oppressing their elders reflects the disrespect for authority and the erosion of the traditional family structure. The image of women ruling over the people reflects the breakdown of the traditional male-led leadership structure. These symbols serve as a powerful warning of the consequences of social and moral decay, and a call to return to the values and principles that uphold a healthy and flourishing society.

In conclusion, Isaiah 3:12 in the King James Version of the Bible is a powerful verse that reflects the moral and social decay of the nation of Judah at the time. It serves as a warning of the consequences of corrupt leadership, the breakdown of the natural order, and the erosion of traditional values and authority. It is a call to repentance and renewal, and a reminder of the importance of wise and righteous leadership, and the impact it can have on the moral and spiritual health of a nation.

Source