Showing posts with label recovery act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label recovery act. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Time magazine names Bernanke 'Person of the Year'





Wed Dec 16, 2009 10:17am EST



By Mark Felsenthal

WASHINGTON, Dec 16 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was named Person of the Year by Time magazine on Wednesday, a highly visible show of support at a time he seeks to beat back proposals that would erode the central bank's authority and independence.

Time credited Bernanke with creative leadership that ensured 2009 would be a year of recovery, however weak, rather than a catastrophic second Great Depression.

"The recession was the story of the year. Without Ben Bernanke ... it would have been a lot worse," Time managing editor Richard Stengel said in a statement.

"We've rarely had such a perfect revision of the cliche that those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Bernanke didn't just learn from history; he wrote it himself and was damned if he was going to repeat it."

Time's selection of Bernanke, an expert on the Depression, is sure to be noticed on Capitol Hill, where Fed-bashing has been the norm in recent weeks.

It comes a day ahead of a vote in the Senate Banking Committee on his nomination to a second term. His first four-year term as Fed chief expires on January 31.

Congress is considering proposals that would strip the Fed, which was due to close out a two-day policy meeting on Wednesday, of its regulatory authority over major banks and expose its interest rate decisions to audits.

One criticism that has been leveled at the Fed and the Obama administration is that despite efforts to prop up the financial system with billions of taxpayers' dollars, banks still show a reluctance to lend.

In an interview with Time, Bernanke said banks have been stabilized, but he conceded that lending remains too weak to support a healthy recovery.

"We have told the banks very clearly that we want them to make loans to creditworthy borrowers, where there are borrowers who can repay the loans," Bernanke said.

After a "near-death experience," banks are wary of taking on the kind of risk that led to the crisis, although they have rebuilt capital, he said.

Bernanke and his colleagues lowered overnight interest rates to near zero a year ago and have pumped more than a trillion dollars into the financial system to overcome the crisis.

Now, Bernanke said it was time to put in place reforms to ward off future crises. "We need to have extensive reform in the private sector, in the public sector, to eliminate these risks in the future," he said.

The Fed, along with the administration and Congress, still has a lot to do to get the economy back to stability and start creating jobs again, he said.

"Even though the recession may be technically over, in a sense that the economy is growing, it's going to feel like a recession for some time, because unemployment remains very high, about 10 percent," he said.

He also said that Congress and the administration need to develop "a credible medium term ... strategy for fiscal policy."

The Obama administration had proposed making the Fed the lead regulatory policing the financial sector for 'systemic" risks. Bernanke said the Fed had never proposed that it be responsible for regulating the entire financial system, although he argued no other agency has its expertise.

"We have a wide range of expertise that makes us the natural supervisor for these large, complex firms," he said.

Banks have yet to broadly understand the need for more restraint on pay after they were bailed out with taxpayer money, he said.

The Fed instituted policies "which we'll be enforcing on banks" that require them to structure pay in ways that align it with performance and discourage excessive risk taking, he said.

"We are going to be looking at that as part of our supervision of banks," he said. (Additional reporting by Ciara Linnane; Editing by Padraic Cassidy)



.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Across US, Infrastructure Is Crumbling




Posted: 10/29/09


SAN FRANCISCO (Oct. 29) -- Billions of dollars from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 are being spent on infrastructure projects across the country, but as this week's closing of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge shows, for every problem that gets addressed, it seems like 10 more are waiting.

Built in 1936, and severely damaged in1989 by the Loma Prieta earthquake, the Bay Bridge closed over Labor Day weekend for retrofitting designed to help it withstand further quakes. In the process of the repairs, an enormous crack was found in an I-bar, requiring further fixes.

On Tuesday, a portion of the second emergency repair gave way, sending steel cables onto the roadway, damaging cars and closing the bridge to traffic once more.

Bridge safety is by no means an isolated issue, however. According to the American Society of Civil Engineers, more than 26 percent of the country's bridges were found to be either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.

Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak has personally witnessed the consequences of putting off infrastructure repair and maintenance. On Aug. 1, 2007, his city's I-35W Bridge over the Mississippi River collapsed, killing 13 people and injuring 145.


Stacy Bengs, AP
On Aug. 1, 2007, the I-35W Bridge collapsed in Minneapolis during the evening rush hour, killing 13 people and injuring 145.


That episode briefly galvanized political will, according to the mayor's spokesman, Jeremy Hanson. "Congress was moved to act," Hanson said. And with federal funds, the bridge was rebuilt in just over a year from the time it fell, at a cost of $234 million.

Now Minneapolis is using $10 million in stimulus funding to refurbish Camden Bridge, another of the city's Mississippi River crossings. Built in 1975, the bridge had deteriorated to the point that it was no longer safe for traffic and was shut down. "It's a major bridge," Hanson said. "And without the stimulus funds, we would not be able to do the project."

For Wayne Klotz, president of the American Society of Civil Engineers, any money allocated to updating the country's infrastructure is welcome. But he's also realistic about just how much the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act can do.

"Only 10 percent of the stimulus package went toward infrastructure. The percentage was relatively small. The primary purpose of the stimulus was to create jobs, not to improve infrastructure," he said.

Asked to prioritize which areas of infrastructure he thinks need immediate attention, Klotz laughed.

"It's kind of like if your kid comes home with a report card with straight D's. Which subject do you start with? Take your pick. We've followed a 'patch and pray' method of infrastructure maintenance in this country. We don't have a single category that has a passing grade."

President Barack Obama recently described the Recovery Act as "the largest investment in the nation's infrastructure since President Eisenhower built the Interstate Highway System." The stimulus plan targets "shovel ready" programs, those that don't require new permits or exhaustive planning. As a result, Klotz said, the approach provides much needed maintenance, but still misses the bigger mark.

"Back in the '50s, '60s and even the first part of the 1970s, the percentage of money we used to spend on infrastructure was 5 to 7 percent of the budget," Klotz said. "We built the best infrastructure system in the world. Now, we're lucky if we spend 1 to 2 percent."

California is one state looking to take full advantage of the Recovery Act money. The nation's leading recipient of stimulus dollars, California recently applied for a $4.7 billion allocation to help pay for a high-speed rail system. That money would be in addition to the billions it is already using to rebuild roads, airports, existing rail lines and, yes, bridges.

But Ross McKeown, a spokesman for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, the agency charged with planning and financing infrastructure projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, said California's stimulus funds are not sufficient to meet the challenges that drastically falling revenues and neglected infrastructure maintenance have brought.

"The stimulus is a one-time, stop-gap measure that doesn't come close to solving the larger issue," McKeown said. "Really, it's just a drop in the bucket."

As Klotz sees it, such steps are vital if we intend to see our economy thrive in the future. "Transportation is our economy," he said. "If our transportation system doesn't work, our economy doesn't work."


Source: http://www.sphere.com/2009/10/29/across-us-infrastructure-is-crumbling/

.