Friday, May 31, 2013

Rome's Religious Matrix - Babylon


Uploaded on Dec 16, 2011

"The term Babylon is derived from Babel, and signifies confusion. It is employed in Scripture designating the various forms of false or apostate religion. In Revelation 17, Babylon is represented as a woman, a figure which is used in the Bible as the symbol of a church, a virtuous woman representing a pure church, a vile woman an apostate church."

"Babylon is further declared to be "that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth." Revelation 17:18. The power that for so many centuries maintained despotic sway over the monarchs of Christendom, is Rome. The purple and scarlet color, the gold and precious stones and pearls, vividly picture the magnificence and more than kingly pomp affected by the haughty see of Rome. And no other power could be so truly declared "drunken with the blood of the saints" as that church which has so cruelly persecuted the followers of Christ."

"The Roman Catholic Church is said to be "the mother of harlots." By her daughters must be symbolized churches that cling to her doctrines and traditions, and follow her example of sacrificing the truth and the approval of God, in order to form an unlawful alliance with the world."

"And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." Revelation 17:5. There are some Sunday keeping churches today that call the Pope the "Anti-christ" and expose all the infidelity of the Papacy. Yet they keep her Sunday institution that is her mark of her self proclaimed ecclesiastical authority.


Angus T Jones vs Devon Franklin: Come into vs Come out of Hollywood

Angus T Jones, Devon Franklin: Come into Vs Come out of Hollywood || POTS Ministries

Jonathan Gardner

Published on May 6, 2013

(POTS) Patience Of the Saints Ministries. For more information:





POTS TWITTER:!/jondadon2006

"Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus."
Rev 14:12


Happy Sabbath


POPE says "ATHEISTS are going to HEAVEN"?


Published on May 28, 2013

**THE POPE says that ATHEIST are going to HEAVEN?***
There is a much BIGGER PLOT behind his statements!!!

Twitter @4runner777
Facebook @ 4runner777
Text @ (417) 693-6995


God's Last Call Before the End

13 - God's Last Call Before the End


Published on Jan 22, 2013

Anciently, God sent one final warning message to His world before the flood. Will He do so again before the return of His Son? YES.


A good time to quit smoking is May 31st World No Tobacco Day

MAY 30, 2013

May 31st is No Tobacco Day
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

The World Health Organization has designated May 31st each year as World No Tobacco Day.


This annual day-long observation serves to highlight the health risks associated with tobacco use and to advocate for effective policies in reducing tobacco consumption.

Besides health, the cost of cigarettes is a primary reason more Americans are quitting tobacco products.

A person who buys one pack a day (the cost in Texas), in one month they spent $168, or an annual cost of $2,184. If the cost of a pack remained the same over ten years, that pack of day would add up to $21,840.

Smoking is the single most preventable cause of death and disease. Cigarettes cause more deaths than cocaine, auto accidents, AIDS, alcohol, heroin, fire, suicide and homicide combined.

The costs to our society include over 400,000 lives lost every year in the U.S.-- over 1200 each day -- and $50 billion annually in lost productivity and increased health care costs.

“Worldwide, the toll exacted by tobacco use is two to three million deaths each year,” indicates the World Health Organization. “Of the world's 1.2 billion smokers, 500 million of them will die because of smoking. This means that 9% of people now alive will die from cigarettes.”

Sixty percent of smokers start by the age of 14, and 90% of smokers are firmly addicted before reaching age 19.

Former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop alerted the nation that nicotine is as addictive as heroin or cocaine. Yet tobacco companies have been spending over $4 billion annually on advertising, or $15 annually for every man, woman, and child in the country.

Because of health problems associated with cigarette smoking, several nations have passed a ban on cigarette advertising. But in the US, the Congress legislated no significant change in this area in the past 30 years.


Ricin Beans

Castor Bean Seeds


Castor Bean plant

Common names:

Castor Bean, Castor Oil Plant, Palma Christi

Scientific name: Ricinus communis

Explanation of scientific name:

Ricinus – the classical Latin name for this plant. It is also the Latin name for tick. The seeds of this plant resemble the bodies of ticks, and Linnaeus used this feature as a basis for the genus name of this plant.
communis – Latin for common or general.


Published on May 30, 2013

Rep. Peter King, R-New York, says suspicious letters sent to President Obama, Mayor Bloomberg 'virtually identical.'


FALSE FLAG: Ricin-laced letters sent to Bloomberg
May 30, 2013

Mayor Bloomberg was the recipient of a ricin-laced letter in recent days, as was the director of his leftist, anti-gun rights group Mayors Against Guns.

Letters Threatening Mayor Tested Positive for Ricin

(New York Times) – Two letters that contained threats to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg — one addressed to him, the other to a lobbyist who works on his gun control campaign — have tested positive for the deadly poison ricin, the authorities said on Wednesday.

We’re suspicious. Very suspicious.

Can you say “false flag operation”? We thought you could.

What’s a false flag operation?

(Wiki) - False flag (or black flag) describes covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. Operations carried during peace-time by civilian organisations, as well as covert government agencies, may by extension be called false flag operations if they seek to hide the real organisation behind an operation.

It seems to us that this fits the profile of a classic false flag operation and we’ll tell you why:

  1. It seems as though the Mayor had a pre-planned statement to offer to press when asked about the incident.
  2. If this came from a gun owner, wouldn’t it have come weeks or months ago when tensions were highest as it looked as though the Senate might pass the gun registration bill?
  3. It would seem this attack is a better fit with someone upset that interest in gun control has faded dramatically in an effort to gin up headlines again.
  4. How hard would it be for a leftist gun hater to rub some castor oil on a piece of paper to set off any testing instruments? Also, if Bloomberg’s mail isn’t automatically pre-screened, why in the world did anyone assume it was “ricin”-laced?

To us, it seems very suspicious.

It would seem anyone who suggests, without further information about a suspect, that it was a reckless, otherwise law-abiding gun owner who did this, probably has an agenda that’s neither clean or pure as the wind driven snow.


Here's to you, first granny Marian Robinson

Published: May 6, 2013 Updated: May 11, 2013 11:10 a.m.

More from this story

Here's to you, first granny Marian Robinson
3 Photos »


Her titles are unofficial: First Granny. First Nanny. First Grandma-in-Chief.

Her duties are familial: Live with and help take care of two of her five grandchildren.

Marian Robinson, far right, has remained a steady presence in the lives of Sasha, center, and Malia Obama as they grow up in the White House. Here they look on following President Barack Obama's public ceremonial inauguration Jan. 21, 2013.

Household rules

Michelle Obama joked in a New York Times article from 2009 about how her mother, Marian Robinson, seems to have forgotten how strict she was at the dinner table.

"My mother, who is now a grandmother – and that's a whole 'nother person – seems to believe that she never, ever really made us eat anything that we didn't want to eat," she told the Times.

Here's a look at some of the Obama household rules compiled by the Times and mentioned in interviews:

  • The girls write reports on the trips they take, whether or not it is a school requirement.
  • During the week, no watching TV or using the computer except for schoolwork.
  • They have to take up two sports, one of their choosing and the other picked by their mother. And they have to see it through, whether they are successful or not. No quitting.
  • Vegetables must be eaten, no matter what grandma's new mind-set is.


Do 6 Catholics + 3 Jews = 9 Protestants?

May 19th, 2010
08:58 AM ET

Religion scholar Stephen Prothero will be a regular contributor to CNN's Belief Blog. With his bestselling book "Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know–And Doesn't," Prothero became the country's leading explainer of how religion undergirds much of American life and history - in ways that most us don't realize. With his new book, "God is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions that Run the World," the Boston University professor has taken his franchise global. A few times each week, Prothero will offer posts on the hidden faith angles behind the news.

By Stephen Prothero, CNN Belief Blog contributor

I think I might have done the math wrong.

Shortly after President Obama nominated Elena Kagan (who is Jewish) to replace Justice John Paul Stevens (who is Protestant) on the Supreme Court, I was quoted in Boston Globe, Beliefnet, and CNN stories, saying that her nomination represented one giant step away from the not-so-good-old-days of Protestant parochialism. "I don't think this means Protestant America is over,” I told the AP, “but I do think it means the old way of thinking about Protestant America is over."

On Monday morning in USA Today I argued, against bloggers like Beliefnet’s Rod Dreher, that the religious commitments of judges matter. I then called for a more religiously diverse Supreme Court. Why not an agnostic? An evangelical? A Muslim?

In all these articles, I was doing the math like this: 6 Catholics + 3 Jews = 0 Protestants. I’m no longer sure that’s right.

Shortly after I filed my USA Today piece, I had a conversation with Nora Rubel, a University of Rochester religion professor and an observant Jew. Professor Rubel said that most Catholics in America think pretty much like most Protestants, so the Supreme Court’s Protestant/Catholic mix doesn’t really matter. I then observed that many Reform Jews are equally Protestantized, which led us to wonder whether the Jewish/Christian mix doesn’t really matter either.

The Protestant ethos has long ruled American political institutions. The current Congress is 55 percent Protestant, and every president except for John F. Kennedy has been an heir of the Reformation. But Protestantism also colors America’s religious institutions, and not always inside the lines of Protestant denominations.

Today many U.S. Catholics and Jews think like Protestants. They believe that religion is something we choose as individuals rather than inherit as communities, and they view it primarily in terms of faith rather than practice. None of this comes from either the Catholic brain of Aquinas or the Jewish mind of Maimonides. The progenitor of this faith-based understanding of religion (who also happens to be the patron saint of religion rulings at the U.S. Supreme Court) is the American Protestant thinker William James, who famously defined religion as "the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine.”

When Supreme Court justices genuflect before this subjective understanding of religion - and most, perhaps all, of today’s sitting justices do - they are thinking like Protestants. And there is little to suggest that Elena Kagan, whose bat mitzvah occurred in a Reconstructionist synagogue in Manhattan’s Upper West Side, would not go and do likewise.

So if you do the math more carefully, it may go something like this: 6 Catholics + 3 Jews = 9 Protestants. Either way, we could use more religious diversity on the Supreme Court.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Stephen Prothero.

Stephen Prothero - CNN Belief Blog contributor


What did the anti-Catholic Know Nothing Party (1845 - 1860) know about this?  Hah? Could they have foreseen this?

- Arsenio

The Mark Of The Beast Is NOT A Microchip! (HD)


Published on Feb 17, 2013



Nebuchadnezzar's Dream Explained (Daniel 2):

Characteristics of the Antichrist:

Outrageous Statements from the Roman Catholic Church:

The Mark of the Beast Revealed:

The Image of the Beast:

The 70 Weeks of Daniel 9 Explained (7-Year Tribulation Proved Wrong):

33 Bible Studies... For ALL The Present Truth:

POGM Statement of Faith:


Videos of Interest:

The Antichrist [POGM]

The Pope Claims To Be God [POGM]

The Mark Of The Beast [POGM]

The Image Of The Beast [POGM]

The Sabbath, Justified [POGM]

The History Of Sunday [ClothedByGrace]

The First Day Of The Week In Scripture [Playlist]

Who Is Israel? [POGM]

Download the audio portions of these videos FREE in mp3 format:



The Beast (or nation) in Revelation 13:2 has the same characteristics as the 3 preceding nations before it. Daniel 7:3-8.

The 1260 years was from 538 AD to 1798 AD. After the Ostrogoths were destroyed in 538 AD, the Vatican formed as a church and state power. This power ended in 1798 AD with Napoleon and the French Revolution, where the Pope was taken captive to France and the Vatican ceased from being a political entity. This was the deadly wound in Revelation 13:3.

1260 years explained:
3½ times (Daniel 7:25; 12:7; Revelation 12:14)
= 42 months (Revelation 13:5, 7)
= 1260 days (Revelation 11:3; 12:6)
= 1260 years (from 538 AD -- 1798 AD)

* In the Bible, times = years (Job 24:1; Psalm 31:10, 15)
* In the Bible, a biblical month has 30 days (Genesis 7:11, 24; 8:3-4)
* In prophecy, a day = a year (Numbers 14:34; Ezekiel 4:6)

The people of God "keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ." Revelation 12:17. "The testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy." Revelation 19:10. Thus, only God's servants (Amos 3:7), who love and obey God (keep the Sabbath), will have the privilege of understanding prophecy.

Notes on the right hand and the forehead:

In prophecy, the right hand can represent...

-To be forced against our will (Jeremiah 34:3; 38:23; 42:11; Ezekiel 21:24)
-To be in someone else's control (Genesis 16:6; Joshua 21:44; 24:8, 10, 11; Judges 2:16; 3:28; 1 Samuel 27:1; 2 Samuel 22:1; Jeremiah 37:17; 38:5; Ezekiel 21:24)
-To be wicked, violent, or undisciplined (Genesis 16:12; Isaiah 59:6; Micah 2:1; 7:3)
-To be destroyed by someone else (1 Samuel 23:17; 27:1; 2 Samuel 24:16; 2 Chronicles 28:5)
-To be in royal favour (1 Kings 2:19; Matthew 25:33)
-A symbol of physical labour or work (Ecclesiastes 9:10)
-Falsehood (Psalm 144:7-8, 11)
-Going astray (Joshua 23:6, 8; 2 Samuel 14:19; Proverbs 4:27)
-The difference of Salvation! (Job 40:14; Psalm 17:7; 108:6; Isaiah 37:20; 59:1; Matthew 5:30)

In prophecy, the forehead is...

-Where the Law of God is written under the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:10-11; 10:16)
-Where the servants of God were marked in the past (Ezekiel 9:4; Revelation 9:4)
-Where the wickedness of Babylon is written (Revelation 17:5)
-Where ancient Israel was stubborn and rebellious (Jeremiah 3:3)
-Where the Seal of God will be placed in the future (Revelation 7:2-3; 14:1)
-Where the name (character) of Christ will be for the redeemed (Revelation 22:4)

Also note that:
-We serve the Law of God with our minds (Romans 7:25)
-The forehead can refer to the brave, fearless attitude, which all true servants of God will possess (Proverbs 28:1; Ezekiel 3:8-9)

When mentioned together, the right hand and the forehead indicate:
-Keeping God's principles (Exodus 13:9, 16)
-Keeping the Ten Commandments (Deuteronomy 6:6-8; 11:18)

The Seal of God exists only in the forehead, and not in the right hand. According to Isaiah 8:16, God's Law will be sealed amongst His people. In the Bible, a seal (or sign) is also a type of mark (Romans 4:11). God's SEAL is keeping His Sabbath (Exodus 31:16-17; Ezekiel 20:12, 20).

Ephesians 6:12, "We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers..."


Attorney General Eric Holdener needs to step down or be fired


Posted: May 30, 2013 - 4:21pm

As a close friend of President Barack Obama, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. should do the honorable thing and step aside before he adds more fuel to the president’s critics who claim his administration is filled with corruption. If Attorney General Holder does not go willingly, then the president has no choice but to fire him.

Holder has exhibited an unwillingness to admit mistakes and/or inappropriate actions by the Justice Department, of which he is the head.

Holder concocted Fast and Furious, a plan to smuggle guns across the Mexican border and then track those weapons once they were in the hands of drug lords and their armies. This scheme backfired. Murders on the Mexican side of the border using Holder’s guns were horrific. A U.S. Border Patrol officer was gunned down by gangs using Holder’s Fast and Furious weapons.

He seemed to have evaded the political radar on gun running, but took a direct hit when he tapped the phones of the Associated Press, Fox News, CBS and ABC news reporters.

Holder is attempting to duck responsibility for this latest fiasco by conducting meetings with the bureau chiefs of several news agencies in Washington. It’s called damage control.

Excuse me, but it’s a bit late for that. It was one thing to send guns to Mexico into the hands of ruthless drug kingpins, but it was unforgiveable when he authorized the wire tapping of phones, emails, cell phones and other devices used by the media.

Now that bastion of Obama supporters, the press, is crying foul.

The Justice Department is indicating that it will mend its ways. The Daily Beast states: “[F]or Attorney General Eric Holder, the gravity of the situation didn’t fully sink in until … he read the (Washington) Post’s front-page story [disclosing the extent of the (James) Rosen probe], sitting at his kitchen table. Quoting from the affidavit, the story detailed how agents had tracked Rosen’s movements in and out of the State Department, perused his private emails, and traced the timing of his calls to the State Department security adviser suspected of leaking to him. Then the story, quoting the stark, clinical language of the affidavit, described Rosen as ‘at the very least ... an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator’ in the crime. Holder knew that Justice would be besieged by the twin leak probes; but, according to aides, he was also beginning to feel a creeping sense of personal remorse.”

Mr. Holder, it’s time to step down.

Keith Hansen


Thursday, May 30, 2013

1,000 United Methodists to convene Sunday for regional meeting in Mobile

By Carol McPhail |

on May 30, 2013 at 1:02 PM, updated May 30, 2013 at 1:21 PM

MOBILE, Alabama – About 1,000 United Methodists will converge on Mobile beginning Sunday for an annual regional conference that will conclude with announcements about clergy appointments.

The conference, to be held June 2-5, is expected to draw clergy and lay people from about 300 churches in the Alabama-West Florida Conference, the denomination’s regional organization, said Mary Catherine Phillips, director of communication. It will be held at Christ United Methodist Church, located at 6101 Grelot Road.

This is Mobile’s fourth year to host the event. The conference was also held here in 2012, 2006 and 2005.

The theme this year will be “The Great Commission: Seeking Disciples.” Speakers include Bishop Lindsey Davis of the Louisville, Ky., area, and David E. Cann of the lnterdenominational Theological Center in Atlanta.

Participants will take time away from sessions Tuesday afternoon to serve organizations in the community. Projects will target 15 Place, Bay Area Food Bank, Dumas Wesley Community Center, Light of the Village, MATthew 6 Ministry and Tent City, among others.

During opening worship on Sunday, a special offering will be collected to help Hurricane Sandy victims in New Jersey.

Phillips said clergy appointments will be among the last business conducted at the conference. A few changes have already been announced, including the appointment of the Rev. Doug Pennington as superintendent of the Mobile District, replacing the Rev. Tonya Elmore, who is taking a position at First United Methodist in Enterprise. The change is effective July 1.

The Mobile District includes 58 congregations.

The Rev. Don Woolley of Saraland United Methodist, meanwhile, is being appointed to a new position that will help churches engage in their communities.


The Great Controversy


Published on Oct 31, 2012

No description available.


Seventh-day Adventists: From doomsday sect to health advocates

Florida Hospital vice president Des Cummings in Celebration… (photo by Jeff Kunerth )

By 28, 2013 |By Jeff Kunerth, Orlando Sentinel

In the Seventh-day Adventist church, they call Oct. 22, 1844, the "Great Disappointment." It was the day the world didn't end.

The church, celebrating its 150th anniversary this month, traces its origins back to a doomsday sect of disillusioned believers in the prophesy of William Miller. The Harold Camping of his day, Miller proclaimed a date for Jesus Christ's return, and when that didn't happen, about 3,500 disappointed believers regrouped to form the Seventh-day Adventists in Battle Creek, Mich.


The Jesuit-Catholic Immigration Reform of 2013

May 13, 2013

President Barack Obama
TheWhite House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC20500

Dear President Obama:

We commend you for your leadership in once again calling on Congressto take up the task of comprehensive immigration reform.  We join you in this desire and reiterate the call of the Catholic Bishops in the United States for comprehensive immigration reform based on the following principles:

•A path to citizenship that ensures that all undocumented immigrants have accessto full rights.
 •A legal employment structure that protects both migrants and United States workers.
• Expedited family reunification and an end to policies and practices that exacerbate family separation.
• The need for due process protections, and accountable and humane enforcement of our immigration laws.
Economic assistance to and fair competition with developing countries

These principles, which we outlined in detail for you in our 2011 letter, provide the framework for a comprehensive immigration reform package that is fair, just and humane. It is our sincere belief that these principles provide a blueprint for updating our nation’s immigration system in a way that promotes the common good, protects national security, respects human rights, promotes business and economic growth, and acknowledges our national heritage as a nation of immigrants.

Read more


U.S. Jesuit Provincials Letter to Congress on Comprehensive Immigration Reform– 2013 will hopefully be the year for compassionate and just immigration reform. The letter the Provinicals wrote in 2010 is as relevant to the debate today as it was over two years ago. The 11 million undocumented Americans deserve a path to legalization that guarantees their full rights and border policies that respect family unity. Read more of the Provincials’ Letter here.

Read it here:

The Vatican and America - Amazing Documentary!


Published on Mar 18, 2013

Please listen to what is being said in this documentary. This is a secular documentary made by the History Channel, and yet it provides amazing insight into the beasts of Revelation 13 and the Whore of Babylon.

Revelation 13 prophesied about two world powers that would change the world. And this documentary supports that prophecy.

Additional Notes: 

  1. Miguel H. Diaz (Cuban), U.S. Ambassador to the holy see (August 5, 2009 – November 5, 2012), seen at 23:33 min. and onward.
  2. "In New York City the value of its property is valued at $2.5 Billion..."
  3. "In Rome the land occupied by the Vatican is valued at about $1.5 Billion..."

The Pope, The Jesuits and the NWO - David Mould

The Pope, The Jesuits and the New World Order (NWO) ~ David Mould

Published on May 13, 2013

The Pope, The Jesuits and the NWO:









For More Information:


The Syllabus of Errors

Pope Pius IX, SYLLABUS OF ERRORS (1864)(1)


Pope Pius IX (1846-1878) was one of the most outspoken opponents of nineteenth-century liberal ideas. The Syllabus of Errors is a systematic condemnation of eighty propositions which he had previously anathematized. Note that the syllabus of errors is drawn up negatively. To be properly understood, each proposition should be preceded by the phrase "It is not true...." It would seem to be implied that the opposites of the condemned propositions are true, although historians disagree on this interpretation.(2)



1) That there exists no Supreme, all-wise, all-provident Divine Being, distinct from the universe, and God is identical with the nature of things, and is, therefore, subject to changes. In effect, God is produced in man and in the world, and all things are God and have the very substance of God, and God is one and the same thing with the world, and, therefore, spirit with matter, necessity with liberty, good with evil, justice with injustice.

2) That all action of God upon man and the world is to be denied.

3) That human reason, without any reference whatsoever to God, is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood, and of good and evil; it is law to itself, and suffices, by its natural force, to secure the welfare of men and of nations.

4) That all the truths of religion proceed from the innate strength of human reason; hence reason is the ultimate standard by which man can and ought to arrive at the knowledge of all truths of every kind.

5) That divine revelation is imperfect, and therefore subject to a continual and indefinite progress, corresponding with the advancement of human reason.

6) That the faith of Christ is in opposition to human reason, and divine revelation not only is not useful, but is even hurtful to the perfection of man.

7) That the prophecies and miracles set forth and recorded in the Sacred Scriptures are the fiction of poets, and the mysteries of the Christian faith the result of philosophical investigations. In the books of the Old and the New Testament there are contained mythical inventions, and Jesus Christ is Himself a myth.


8) That as human reason is placed on a level with religion itself, so theological must be treated in the same manner as philosophical sciences.

9) That all the dogmas of the Christian religion are indiscriminately the object of natural science or philosophy; and human reason, enlightened solely in an historical way, is able, by its own natural strength and principles, to attain to the true science of even the most abstruse dogmas; provided only that such dogmas be proposed to reason itself as its object.

10) That as the philosopher is one thing, and philosophy another, so it is the right and duty of the philosopher to subject himself to the authority which he shall have proved to be true; but philosophy neither can nor ought to submit to any such authority.

11) That the Church not only ought never to pass judgment on philosophy, but ought to tolerate the errors of philosophy, leaving it to correct itself.

12) That the decrees of the Apostolic See and of the Roman congregations impede the true progress of science.

13) That the methods and principles by which the old scholastic doctors cultivated theology are no longer suitable to the demands of our times and to the progress of the sciences.

14) That philosophy is to be treated without taking any account of super-natural revelation.


15) That every man is free to embrace and profess that religion which, guided by the light of reason, he shall consider true.

16) That man may, in the observance of any religion whatever, find the way of eternal salvation, and arrive at eternal salvation.

17) That good hope at least is to be entertained of the eternal salvation of all those who are not at all in the true Church of Christ.

18) That protestantism is nothing more than another form of the same true Christian religion, in which form it is given to please God equally as in the Catholic Church.


....Pests of this description are frequently rebuked in the severest terms in [many previous papal encyclicals]


That the Roman Pontiffs and Oecumenical Councils have exceeded the limits of their powers, have usurped the rights of princes, and have even committed errors in defining matters of faith and morals.

That the ecclesiastical power must not exercise its authority without the permission and assent of the civil government.

That the Church has not the power of availing herself of force, or of any direct or indirect temporal power....

That ecclesiastical jurisdiction for the temporal causes--whether civil or criminal--of the clergy, ought by all means to be abolished.

That National Churches can be established, after being withdrawn and separated from the authority of the Holy Pontiff.

That many Pontiffs have, by their arbitrary conduct, contributed to the division of the Church into Eastern and Western.

That there would be no obstacle to the sentence of a general council or the act of all the peoples, transferring the pontifical sovereignty from the Bishop and City of Rome to some other bishopric and city.


39) That the State, as being the origin and source of all rights, is endowed with a certain right not circumscribed by any limits.

40) That the teaching of the Catholic Church is hostile to the well-being and interests of society.

41) That the civil government, even when in the hands of an infidel sovereign, has a right to an indirect negative power over religious affairs....

42) That in the case of conflicting laws enacted by the two powers, the civil law prevails.

43) That the secular power has authority to rescind, declare and render null, solemn conventions, commonly called concordats, entered into with the Apostolic See, regarding the use of rights appertaining to ecclesiastical immunity, without the consent of the Apostolic See, and even in spite of its protest.

44) That the civil authority may interfere in matters relating to religion, morality and spiritual government: hence, it can pass judgment on the instructions issued for the guidance of consciences, conformably with their mission, by the pastors of the Church. Further, it has the right to make enactments regarding the administration of the divine sacraments, and the dispositions necessary for receiving them.

45) That the entire government of public schools in which the youth of a Christian state is educated, except (to a certain extent) in the case of episcopal seminaries, may and ought to appertain to the civil power, and belong to it so far that no other authority shall be recognized as having any right to interfere in the discipline of the schools, the arrangement of the studies, the conferring of degrees, in the choice or approval of the teachers.

46) That moreover, even in ecclesiastical seminaries, the methods of studies to be adopted is subject to the civil authority.

47) That the best theory of civil society requires that popular schools open to children of every class of the people, and, generally, all public institutes intended for instruction in letters and philosophical sciences and for carrying on the education of youth, should be freed from all ecclesiastical authority, control and interference, and should be fully subjected to the civil and political power at the pleasure of the rulers, and according to the standard of the prevalent opinions of the age.

48) That Catholics may approve of the system of educating youth unconnected with Catholic faith and the power of the Church, and which regards the knowledge of merely natural things, and only, or at least primarily, the ends of earthly social life.

49) That the civil power may prevent the prelates of the Church and the faithful from communicating freely and mutually with the Roman Pontiff.

50) That lay authority possess of itself the right of presenting bishops, and may require of them to undertake the administration of the diocese before they receive canonical institution, and Letters Apostolic from the Holy See.

51) And further [that] the lay government has the right of deposing bishops from their pastoral functions, and is not bound to obey the Roman pontiff in those things which relate to the institution of bishoprics and the appointment of bishops.

52) That government can, by its own right, alter the age prescribed by the Church for the religious profession of women and men; and may require of all religious orders to admit no person to take solemn vows without its permission.

53) That the laws enacted for the protection of religious orders and regarding their rights and duties ought to be abolished; nay, more [that] civil Government may lend its assistance to all who desire to renounce the obligation which they have undertaken of a religious life, and to break their vows. That Government may also suppress the said religious orders, as likewise collegiate churches and simple benefices, even those of advowson, and subject their property and revenues to the administration and pleasure of the civil power.

54) That kings and princes are not only exempt from the jurisdiction of the Church, but are superior to the Church in deciding questions of jurisdiction.

55) That the Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.


56) That moral laws do not stand in need of divine sanction, and [that] it is not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the laws of nature, and receive their power of binding from God.

57) That the science of philosophical things and morals and also civil laws may and ought to be kept aloof from divine and ecclesiastical authority.

58) That no other forces are to be recognized except those which reside in matter, and [that] all the rectitude and excellence of morality ought to be placed in the accumulation and increase of riches by every possible means, and the gratification of pleasure.

59) That right consists in the materials fact. [That] all human duties are an empty word, and all human facts have the force of right.

60) That authority is nothing else but numbers and the sum total of material forces.

61) That the injustice of an act when successful inflicts no injury on the sanctity of right.

62) That the principle of non-intervention, as it is called, ought to be proclaimed and observed.

63) That it is lawful to refuse obedience to legitimate princes, and even to rebel against them.

64) That the violation of any solemn oath, as well as any wicked and flagitious action repugnant to the eternal law, is not only not blamable but is altogether lawful and worthy of the highest praise when done through love of country.


67) That by the law of nature the marriage tie is not indissoluble, and [that] in many cases, divorce, properly so called, may be pronounced by the civil authority.

73) That a merely civil contract may, among Christians, constitute a true marriage, and [that] it is false either that the marriage contract between Christians is always a sacrament, or that the contract is null if the sacrament is excluded.


76) That the abolition of the Temporal Power, of which the Apostolic See is possessed, would contribute in the greatest degree to the liberty and prosperity of the Church.


77) That in the present day it is no longer expedient that the Catholic religion should be held as the only religion of the State, to the exclusion of all other forms of worship.

78) That hence it has been wisely decided by law, in some Catholic countries, that persons coming to reside therein shall enjoy the public exercise of their own peculiar worship.

79) That moreover, it is false that the civil liberty of every form of worship, and the full power, given to all, of overtly and publicly manifesting any opinions whatsoever and thoughts, conduce more easily to corrupt the morals and minds of the people, and to propagate the pest of indifferentism.

80) That the Roman Pontiff can, and ought to, reconcile himself, and come to terms with progress, liberalism, and modern civilization.

1. Compiled from the following sources: a) J. H. Hexter, The Traditions of the Western World (Chicago, 1967), pp. 723-727; b) Brooklyn College History 2.1 Sourcebook, pp. 222-223; c) Henry Bettenson (ed.), Documents of the Christian Church (London and New York, 1963), pp. 272-273.

2. Paraphrased from J. H. Hexter, The Traditions of the Western World, p. 723.


Google Will Let Users Send Money as an Email Attachment

Cameron Scott on May 15, 2013 5:48 PM

Gmail users will be able to send money as an attachment to make person-to-person payments online, Google said today.

Along with the paper clip attachment icon, users will see a dollar sign that allows them to send money.

The feature draws on Google Wallet, an app once intended to facilitate in-store payments with smartphones but which has increasingly focused on Web payments. Wallet allows users to store their credit card or bank account information with it to make it easier to pay multiple vendors.

“Wallet is now integrated into Gmail. This means you can securely send money to friends and family in the U.S. – without leaving your Gmail inbox,” the company said in a blog post.

The service is free when it’s used to debit bank accounts directly. Senders pay a 2.9 percent fee if Wallet accesses a credit or debit card.

This feature will be available to U.S.-based Gmail users over 18. It will roll out “over the next few months,” Google said.


Wednesday, May 29, 2013

The Supressed Tuth about the Assasination of Abraham Lincoln

about the

Written and Compiled by
BURKE McCARTY, Ex-Romanist

Originally Published by
Arya Varta Publishing Company
P. O. Box 456
Haverhill, MS

Published in 1924
Reprint February 1964
Reprint February 1973
Reprint April 1982
Published in HTML format in 1999


The Conspiracy of Silence on the Death of Abraham Lincoln

By the original Author, Burke McCarty

In all the bloody history of the Papacy, perhaps in no one man, as in Abraham Lincoln, was there concentrated such a multitude of reasons for his annihilation by that system.

In all the history of the political assassination plots by the enemies of Freedom, which for cold calculation, malicious methods, relentless pursuit, subtle cunning, and cowardly execution, nothing can exceed the cruel murder of this greatest of all Americans - for President Lincoln was the living, breathing type in which was fulfilled the triumph of the New Concept of Popular Government, the central postulate of which is, the consent of the governed. It was the life of Abraham Lincoln which placed this form of government forever outside an “experiment” where its enemies persisted in endeavoring to keep it.

That a barefoot, nameless boy on poverty’s path could, by his own efforts, reach the highest office in the gift of the American people, gave the lie to the “Divine Right” croakers, and merited their most unceasing hatred.

Barring the martyrdoms of Jesus Christ and Joan D’Arc, the methods used in Abraham Lincoln’s assassination will stand preeminent in point of malice and cruelty, and, strange as it may seem, the same diabolical cunning which nerved the hand of the assassin has pursued Lincoln beyond the grave, and has been largely physical destruction, a crime, in the eyes of the writer, of silence on his death, the youth of America are being deprived of the knowledge of the details of the greatest tragedy in their country’s history. 1

This appalling fact has been the one big urge which inspired the writing of this book, the contents of which represent only a part of the result of leisure hours spent in public and private libraries in the various cities, covering a period of the past seven years - gathering a fact here and one there, from books, magazines, newspapers and court records, filing them away, and finally condensing the salient points between the covers which you now hold in your hand.

I feel safe in stating that nowhere else can be found in one book the connected presentation of the story leading up to the death of Abraham Lincoln, which was instigated by the “Black” pope, the General of the Jesuit Order, camouflaged by the “White” pope, Pius IXth, aided, abetted and financed by other “Divine Righters” of Europe, and finally consummated by the Roman Hierarchy and their paid agents in this country [America] and French Canada on “Good Friday” night, April 14th, 1865, at Ford’s Theater, Washington, D. C.

I am convinced that if this knowledge can be given adequate distribution and placed in possession of the boys and girls of the public elementary schools, for whom it is especially designed to reach, that the wicked boast of the Jesuits and their lay agents, the Knights of Columbus, to “MAKE AMERICA CATHOLIC” can never be accomplished.


In closing, I only ask each reader whose heart beats in unison with those of us who love our country and all that it represents, to assist in the sale of this little book, by giving it all the publicity possible, thereby joining in President Lincoln’s expression of loyalty, “If ever my country is destroyed, it shall be my proudest plume, not that I was the last to desert her, but that I NEVER DESERTED HER!”

Yours truly: Burke McCarty

By Ronald Powell, Th.D, D.R.E.

I have retyped this book, and set the print for it to be republished. I started this work in January of 1999. I have tried my best to use every word of the original work by Mr. McCarty only correcting the spellings of a few words to conform to the current spellings used today, 75 years later.

I pray this book will be revealing to you concerning the evils of the Roman Catholic system and a warning that this ruthless and barbaric system has never given up its hope of world conquest.

During World War II when the Croatian Catholics took over Yugoslavia they killed more than 750,000 Orthodox, forced almost as many out of their homeland, and converted over 500,000 of them to Roman Catholicism at the point of a bayonet! The soldiers would march into towns and villages led by Roman Catholic priests who instituted this modern-day inquisition with torturous brutality and murder!

If this evil Roman system ever took over America, then the rest of the world can kiss themselves good-bye!

For the sake of the world, pray this never happens or this world will have another “Dark Ages”.

by Dr. Ronald Powell

1 Back in 1991 or 1992 I was talking with a missionary that lived close to me in Taiwan. I told him about the Catholic Church murdering Lincoln and at least four other American presidents. He laughed and simply would not believe it. I offered him my Pamphlet, Philosophy, Evolution, Religion [Roman Catholicism] Vs True Christianity, but he just refused to even consider reading it, even with my assurances that I had it all footnoted and documented. When I told him of the Vatican backing Hitler in World War II he just laughed and walked off. This is the sad state of American Christianity since about 1975. American youth can tell you all about black basketball players, but can not even find Canada on a map!

about the

Written and Compiled by
BURKE McCARTY, Ex-Romanist

Chapter I
Destruction of This Republic Plotted By European Monarchists

The death of President Lincoln was the culmination of but one step in the attempt to carry out the Secret Treaty of Verona, of October, 1822, a pact entered into by the “highest contracting parties” of the former Congress of Vienna, Austria, which had held its session secret, covering the whole year of 1814-15.
Simultaneously with the calling of the Congress of Vienna in 1814, Pope Pius VIIth restored the Society of Jesus [Jesuit Order] which had been abolished by Pope Clement IVth, July 21, 1773, on the grounds that it was immoral, dangerous and was a menace to the very life of the papacy. Clement was promptly poisoned for his act.

With the restoration of this order, the execution of the Secret Treaty of Verona was placed in their keeping.
The Congress of Vienna was a black conspiracy against Pop- ular Governments at which the “high contracting parties” announc- ed at its close that they had formed a “holy alliance.” This was a cloak under which they masked to deceive the people. The particular business of the Congress of Verona, it developed, was the RATIFICATION of Article Six of the Congress of Vienna, which was in short, a promise to prevent or destroy Popular Governments wherever found, and to re-establish monarchy where it had been set aside.
The “high contracting parties” of this compact which were Russia, Prussia, Austria and the Pope Pius VIIth, king of the Papal States, entered into a secret treaty to do so. That the reader may get some idea of the villainy of these two Congresses and their relation to our government, and to the death of Abraham Lincoln, I quote excerpts from that document below, as it appears on the Congressional Record of April 25, 1916, placed there by Senator Robert L. Owen and as it is recorded in the Diplomatic Code, by Elliott, page 179:

“The undersigned specially authorized to make some additions to the treaty of the Holy Alliance, after having exchanged their respective credentials, have agreed as follows:

ARTICLE 1. The high contracting powers being convinced that the system of representative government is equally as incompatible with the monarchical principles as the maxim of the sovereignty of the people with the divine right, engage mutually, in the most solemn manner to use all their efforts to put an end to the system of representative governments, in whatever country it may exist in Europe, and to prevent its being introduced in those countries where it is not yet known.

ARTICLE 2. As it cannot be doubted that the liberty of the press is the most powerful means used by the pretended supporters of the rights of nations to the detriment of those of princes, the high contracting parties promise reciprocally to adopt all proper measures TO SUPPRESS IT, NOT ONLY IN THEIR OWN STATE BUT ALSO IN THE REST OF EUROPE.

ARTICLE 3. Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt 1 with the aim of ameliorating their own interests, so intimately connected with the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers join in offering THEIR THANKS TO THe POPE FOR WHAT HE HAS ALREADY DONE FOR THEM, AND SOLICIT HIS CONSTANT CO-OPERATION IN THEIR VIEWS OF SUBMITTING THE NATIONS.

ARTICLE 4. The situation of Spain and Portugal unite unhappily all the circumstances to which this treaty has particular reference. The high contracting parties, in confiding to France the care of putting an end to them, engaged to assist her in manner which may at least compromit them with their own people and the people of France by means of subsidy on the part of the two empires of 20,000,000 of francs every year from the date of signature of this treaty to the end of the war.

ARTICLE 5. In order to establish in the peninsula the order of things which existed before the revolution of Cadiz, and to insure the entire execution of the articles of the present treaty, the high contracting parties give to each other the reciprocal assurance that as long as their views are not fulfilled, rejecting all other ideas of futility or other measure to be taken, they will address themselves with the shortest possible delay to all the authorities existing in their states and to all their agents in foreign countries, with the view to establish connections tending toward the accomplishment of the objects proposed by this treaty.

ARTICLE 6. This treaty shall be renewed with such changes as new circumstances may give occasion for, either at a new congress, or at the court of one of the contracting parties, as soon as the war with Spain shall be terminated.

ARTICLE 7. The present treaty shall be ratified and the ratifications exchanged at Paris within the space of six months.

Made at Verona the 22nd of November, 1822
For Austria: Metternich.
For France: Chateaubriand.
For Russia: Bernstet.
For Russia: Nesselrode.”

When Senator Owen was questioned by members of Congress upon the meaning of the Treaty, the Record shows his reply part as follows:

“This Holy Alliance, having put a Bourbon prince upon the throne of France by force, then used France to suppress the condition of Spain, immediately afterwards, and by the very treaty gave her a subsidy of 20,000,000 francs annually to enable her to wage war upon the people of Spain and prevent their exercise of any measure of the right of self-government. The Holy Alliance immediately did the same thing in Italy, by sending Austrian troops to Italy, where the people there attempted to exercise a like measure of liberal constitutional Self-government: and it was not until the printing press, which the Holy Alliance so stoutly opposed, taught the people of Europe the value of liberty that finally one country after another seized a greater and greater right of self-government, until now it may be fairly said that nearly all the nations of Europe have a very large measure of self-government.

“However, I wished to call the attention of the Senate to this important history in the growth of constitutional popular self-government. The Holy Alliance made its powers felt by the wholesale drastic suppression of the powers felt by universal censorship, by killing free speech and all ideas of popular rights, and by the complete suppression of popular government. The Holy Alliance having destroyed popular government in Spain, and in Italy, had well-laid plans also to destroy popular government in the American Colonies which had revolted from Spain and Portugal in Central and South America under the influence of the successful example of the United States.”

“It was because of this conspiracy against the American Republics by the European monarchies that the great English statesman, Canning, called the attention of our government to it, and our statesmen then, including Thomas Jefferson, who was still living at that time, took an active part to bring about the declaration by President Monroe in his next annual message to the Congress of the United States that the United States would regard it as an act of hostility to the government of the United States and an unfriendly act, if this coalition, or if any power of Europe ever undertook to establish upon the American continent any control of any American republic, or to acquire any territorial rights.

“This is the so-called Monroe Doctrine. The threat under the secret treaty of Verona to suppress popular government in the American republics is the basis of the Monroe Doctrine. This secret treaty sets forth clearly the conflict between monarchial government and popular government, and the government of the few as against the government of the many.”

The above comments of our United States Senator before Congress in 1916, clearly defines the object and intent of these “Divine Righters” in Europe.

It will be well for the reader to understand that the church of Rome with its sixteen centuries of intrigue, plans fifty or a hundred years ahead. The ultimate goal of the GREAT SCHEME is to throw the lever of time back by restoring the Pope as the “universal arbiter” from whom all the rulers of the earth must receive their authority to rule, as during the Dark Ages.

The BIG IDEA of democracy, taught by Jesus Christ when He proclaimed the spiritual equality of all men, has always been hated and feared by the Jesuit System, and made the target of their venom, despite all their protestations of Christianity.

The IDEA of spiritual equality logically and inevitable leads to social equality which has been made practical by Popular Governments.

The central Idea of Popular Government is “consent of the governed.”

The first real social freedom resulted from the Protestant Reformation, led by the little German monk Martin Luther, in 1517. This was an unpardonable sin – this was the death blow to the Papacy.
Protestant Germany, Protestant England, and of course, Protestant United States, have been from the beginning marked by them for destruction. Ex-Catholic Italy and ex-Catholic France are next in this “rule or ruin” Policy. In Protestant Denmark, Sweden, and Holland, the same process of “working from within”, is being pursued as it is in this country and Canada.

The seeds of hate between Germany and England were planted in those two glorious Protestant countries by the Jesuits so that they might develop in time to block the celebration of the Protestant Reformation on its four hundredth Anniversary – an event which was planned to surpass anything o f the kind the world has ever seen, a celebration which would have set Protestantism fifty years ahead.

The Jesuits, anticipating this, started the World War [WW I] which completely sidetracked it.
For over sixty years the Great Scheme the Vatican and its Jesuits have been working on is, in a nutshell, to form an ECCLESIASTICAL EMPIRE, uniting French Canada with our Atlantic States, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut. This is to be done by annexation, manipulated through corrupt politicians at Washington, D. C., in much the same method as the annexation of Texas was accomplished, over sixty years ago.

The next big card being played by Rome is the unification of the French Canadian and Irish-Catholic vote in the New England States where the influx of Catholic Canadians is of such proportion as to cause serious consideration of loyal Americans right now.

The Church is meeting with some difficulty, owing to the deep seated dislike between the French and Irish Catholics. This, however, is being rapidly overcome by two methods: intermarriage and through the work of the Knights of Columbus which is by far the most dangerous lay organization in this country.

The “Tragedy of Quebec”, a book written by a PROTESTANT Canadian, exposes the PLAN in detail, and the facts and figures given by this writer who has been a close student of the subject for many years are starting. It would be illumination to the reader who is not familiar with this book to read it. The full plan of extending the Pope’s empire on the Atlantic coast will be done by Latinizing our Southern States, a process which was begun very early in our history, prior to the Civil War.

The big efforts of the Catholic Church to papalize the Negro in the South should not be overlooked where great strides have been taken in that direction.

The next step in the Vatican’s Great Scheme is to make war between this country and Japan after the latter country has been placed under full dominance of the Jesuits. 2 The priests, monks, and nuns of the Roman Church have been pouring into Japan from all over the world now for many years with that purpose in view. The writer was told by a Christian Japanese minister in charge of a Protestant mission in Los Angeles in reply to the question as to why the Jesuits, who had been barred for years from Japan, had now been permitted to enter. He answered that the Roman Church had gotten into his country under the guise of Mohammedanism, and that after it was well entrenched threw off its disguise, and his country learned to its astonishment that it was to the Roman Church and its monastic orders it had opened its doors.

That the Roman-Catholic-controlled trade unions in California are at the bottom of most of the agitation against the Japanese in that State is a fact; that the Roman Catholic politician, James Phelan, was sent to the United States Senate in 1913 by the solid Roman vote, and has been the prime mover in the anti-Jap agitation, is also a fact.

There are many Californians, of course outside the Roman church, who fear the Japanese menace on account of their prolific propagation, and their non-assimilative proclivities, but it is only since I have realized the activity of the Jesuits to papalize Japan, that the real horror of the “yellow peril” has impressed itself upon me. Add Romanism to Japan, and it certainly becomes terrifying in its aspect.

I am not presenting these things as a calamity howler, but I believe with careful consideration and immediate intelligent activity, the danger can be averted. We must be alert and doing.

And now we will take up the Roman question which is the big, overshadowing world question today, and it will continue to be until the Papacy is finally uprooted. We will have to take cognizance of it in Europe frequently through these pages in order to get a clear view of the impending danger to ourselves, I ask the reader to be patient and follow me closely in my hurdling of the Atlantic, back and forth, at various times which I have been obliged to do. It is a big and perplexing question to try to simplify sufficiently for the busy non-Romanist who is so absorbed in his own affairs and who so little understands that pernicious system.
The great mistake which the American non-Catholic people make is that they judge the Papacy by the Roman Church as they find it in this country. One cannot gauge it from this standpoint, for we must remember that it is operation where more than five-sixths of the people are non-Romanists – in a Protestant country. In order to get an accurate estimate one must survey where it has held sway for centuries, On this side of the Atlantic, for instance, we will have to contemplate it, as it is in Mexico, or Central and South America, in order to get a true estimate.

I shall quote through these pages copiously from several books, some of which are out of print, in order that their messages may not be entirely lost.

by Dr. Ron Powell

1 This is the wording that will allow the Catholic Church to institute another inquisition which will bring death, darkness, and do away with free-speech unless everyone conforms to the Catholic system run by the anti-christ sitting on the golden throne in the Vatican State!

2 This did, in deed, happen 17 years after this book was first printed [1924] when the American Government forced Japan to attack Pearl Harbor [See John Toland’s book] by cutting off all of Japan’s oil and iron forcing Japan to attack or allow her economy and war machine to grind to a halt!

about the

Written and Compiled by
BURKE McCARTY, Ex-Romanist

Chapter II

The “Society of Jesus” the members of which are referred to as the Jesuits, has absorbed the Papacy. This society was founded by a fanatic, one Ignatius Loyola, in 1541; its object being to combat the Protestant Reformation of Martin Luther of 1517.

Loyola was the son of a prominent Spanish family who had distinguished himself as a soldier, and by the immoral excesses of his private live, but who, owing to an accident which maimed him, was supposed to have become “converted”, and during the illness which followed, the Society of Jesus was conceived in his brain, fertile with deviltry.

The Society of Jesus is under the strictest military discipline, due to the military training and psychology of its founder. It is absolutely commanded by the “General” its head, also known as the “Black” Pope. The garb is always a plain black cassock. But here permit me to present the definition of one of its eminent “Generals” of the seventeenth century and which aptly describes it today:

“The members of the Society are dispersed in every corner of the world, and divided into as many nations and kingdoms as the earth has limits; divisions, however, marked only by distance of places, not of sentiment; by the differences of languages, not of affections; by the dissemblance of faces, not of manners. In that family the Latin thinks as the Greek, the Portuguese as the Brazilian, the Hibernian as the Sumatran, the Spanish as the French, the English as the Flemish; and amongst so many different geniuses, no controversy, no contention, nothing which gives you a hint, to perceive that they have more than one. . . . Their birthplace offers them no motive of personal interest. The same aim, same conduct, same VOW, which like a conjugal know, has tied them together. At the least sign one man, the General, turns and returns the entire society and shapes the revolution of so large a body. 1

“It is easy to move, but difficult to shape.” [Imago Primsaeculi Societas Jesu”, published by the aurhorization of Mutto Vittelshi, General in 1640.]

With some above authentic illumination you will be able to somewhat grasp the reason that the execution of the mandate of the Holy Alliance and secret treaty of Verona was entrusted to the members of the Society of Jesus. God save the mark!

As a further item of interest we quote the following excerpts of this oath bound organization. It is the oath taken now by practically all priests of the Church of Rome, and has been charged as the one taken by members of the Fourth Degree in the Knights of Columbus. [See Congressional Record, House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thomas S. Butler, February 15, 1913, pages 3215-16.]

“I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., now in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the Blessed Michael the Archangel, The Blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, and all the Saints, scared host of Heaven and to you, my ghostly Father, the Superior General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the Pontification of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ, declare and swear that his holiness, the Pope, is Christ’s Vice-regent, and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church throughout the earth; and that by the virtue of the keys of binding and loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths, and governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation, and that they may be safely destroyed.

“Therefore, to the utmost of my power, I shall and will defend this doctrine and his Holiness’ right and customs against all usurpers of the heretical or Protestant authority, whatever especially the Luthern Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, and the now pretended authority of the Church of England and Scotland, the branches of the same, now where . . . . . I do now renounce and disown any allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates or officers.

“I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed with to assume any religion heretical, for the propagating of the Mother Church’s interest, to keep secret and private all her agents’ counsels, from time to time as they may instruct me, and not to divulge directly or indirectly, by word, writing, or circumstances whatever; but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father . . . . .

“I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or cadaver [perinde ac cadaver] but unhesitatingly, obey each and very command that I may receive from my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and Jesus Christ.2

“That I will go to any part of the world, whatsoever, without murmuring and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me3 . . . . . I do further promise and declare, that I will, when opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do to extirpate4 and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth,5 and that I will spare neither sex,6 age, nor condition,7 and that I will hang,8 waste, boil, flay, strangle,9 and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants’ heads against the wall, in order to annihilate forever10 their execrable race.


The late Edwin A. Sherman, a 33rd Degree Mason of Oakland, California, in his book entitled, The Engineer Corps of Hell, quotes Charles Sauvestre, whose work he translated from the Spanish, which says in part:

“Such are the Jesuits. Always expelled, forever returning, and little by little, clandestinely, and in the darkness, throwing out its vigorous roots. Its wealth may be confiscated, its looses cannot be detained for they are covered . . . . Confessors, negotiators, brokers, lenders, peddlers of pious gew gaws, inventors of new devotions to make merchandise. At times, mixing in politics, agitating states, and making princes tremble upon their thrones, for they are terrible in their hate. WOE UNTO HIM WHEN THEY TURN UPON HIM AS AN ENEMY! . . . . . Its society grows and increases in riches and influence by all sorts of means; and no one can attach them, for everywhere we find men prompt to serve them, to obtain from them some advantage of position or pride . . . . . For Themselves, they are nothing, not having pompous titles, no croziers, no mitres, no capes of the prebendaries, but pertain to that one ORDER, everywhere governing and directing . . . . In whatever place of the Catholic world a Jesuit is insulted or resisted, no matter how insignificant he may be, he is sure to be avenged, - and this we know.”

“The General is always surrounded by counsellors, professors, novices, and graduates”, says Michelet . . “prescribing friendship in the seminaries and being prohibited to walk two by two, it is necessary to be alone, or three together, but not less, for it is well known that the Jesuits never establish any intimacy before a third, for the third is a spy; for when there are three, which is indispensable, there cannot be found a traitor.”


The papal church when expedient, follows the rule of pagan Rome to hold a conquered country in leash, and make it yield its pound of flesh, by placing over it native rulers, which is the easy way to approach the people on their blind side.

In 1753 an American-born boy of eighteen, one John Carroll, from Upper Marborough, Maryland, entered the College of the Society of Jesuits at Watteau, Flanders, to study for the Romish priesthood in that Order. The time required ordinarily for the training in that Society, is fourteen years, and, as John Carroll was not ordained until he had served sixteen years in preparation, it is safe to conclude that this American-born youth was an especially well grounded “Cadaver” [see the Jesuit oath on page 11 para 3] upon his return to the Colonies in 1769, and that his Society was justified in feeling that its interests would be competently administered.

John Carroll had taken the oath from which we quoted some pages back, to “When opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all heretical, Protestants and Liberals.”
It is interesting to note that John Carroll was a first cousin to Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the only romanist who signed the Declaration of Independence.

The officials of Maryland Colony sent a committee, of which Benjamin Franklin was a member, to visit French Canada to see if help could be had from that source in the interest of the Colonies in the coming conflict with England.

It was recommended by Congress that Charles Carroll ask his cousin, John Carroll, the Jesuit priest, to accompany them, hoping that he would use his influence in securing the assistance of the French priest in the Cause of the Colonies, an act which showed the lack of understanding of the fundamentals and discipline of the Jesuit Society, by the Colonists.

Of course, the expedition utterly failed, owing to the influence of the French priests and the people of French Canada, over whom “Father” John Carroll was supposed to have had the power of persuasion. Through England was an “heretical” country, the exceedingly liberal and the independent spirit of defiance in the American Colonies, was far more menacing, in the eyes of the priests, to the interests of the church and the divine righters, and Priest Carroll’s Jesuit Oath precluded the possibility of his having any interest in his native country, consequently he had to think in the same channel as his French compatriots in religion. That he, a few years later, merited the distinction from his church to be made the first Archbishop of Baltimore, and was permitted to live to the ripe old age of four score years, is proof positive that he served his church faithfully by strictly adhering to his Jesuit Oath, The first Archbishop of Baltimore left his indelible stamp on that diocese as was clearly demonstrated during the Civil War, for every plot to assassinate President Lincoln, and there were many, was hatched in Baltimore - in fact, Baltimore is the vienna of America.

The fact also must not be overlooked, that there were less than 30,000 romanists and 25 priests in the Colonies at the breaking out of the Revolution. This, of course, was a handicap to the Reverend Carroll.
The first Archbishop of Baltimore must have been, however, thoroughly conversant with the rumblings of the Revolution in Europe, for his Society was having some “rough sledding” during the early eighteenth century when he arrived in Flanders, and its members were being driven out of first one country and then another.

The great battle for political freedom was being bitterly waged between the Jesuits on one hand and Freemasonry on the other, just as in the final analysis of the present irrepressible conflict in the United States today, these two forces are lining up, a fact which is becoming more obvious as time goes on.
They stand today as they have always stood, these Jesuits, against every principle upon which Freemasonry is founded - upon which Americanism is based.

A group of French cyclopedists,12 led by Jean Jacques Rousseau, had embodied a new concept of government, in which the central postulate was, that the only authority to govern should come from the consent of the governed. This was whipped into shape and published early in the eighteenth century and boldly proclaimed to the world by Rousseau in his Social Contract - contract of society. Eleven years after, Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine and other framers of our Declaration of Independence, incorporated it in that great chart of liberty, and when the silver tones of our old Liberty Bell in Philadelphia rang it out on July 4th, 1776, it reverberated around the world and stirred the red blood of every divine-right hater to its depths:

“Gravely plain the good pen lined it,
and the Fifty Six all signed it;
Pledged their lives to seal and bind it,
True and well!
Then sudden from the steeple,
Clanged the tocsin of the people,
Spoke the sum of history’s pages,
Pealed the thoughts of saints and sages,
Rang the keynote of the ages, - in the Bell.”
[The Liberty Bell by Howard S. Taylor]

It is difficult now for us to realize the boldness and courage required of that little group of Colonial “Rebels” who gathered around the table in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, to sign that document. It was a grim joke, indeed, that Benjamin Franklin sprung when he took up the pen to write in his name, and said: “Gentlemen, we must now all hang together, for if we don’t, we will hang separately.”

The success of the revolution in the American Colonies gave the stimulation to the French to revolt in 1789. The triumphant conclusion of John Wilkes’ battle for a free press in England, the rumblings of revolt in the Papal States where the pope was king, all these held the cradle of Popular Government in this country in security until the infant had dropped its swaddling clothes, and got a fair start to grow.

John Carroll was studying in the Jesuit College in Flanders when Rousseau’s Social Contract set Europe ablaze with its message to the downtrodden masses. The sensation precipitated by the revolutionary proclamation can but faintly imagined now. Certain it is that the pope of Rome with the rest of the crown heads of Europe saw the handwriting on the wall, if the New Idea of government were permitted to take root.
Four years later John Carroll was a full-fledged Jesuit priest, and was returned to his native land where he had an opportunity to get a “close-up” of the working out of the first Popular Government where the people were the only source of authority.

In 1808 this Jesuit priest was created the first Archbishop of Baltimore, by his “Lord-God” the pope. In receiving the pallium he took a more disloyal oath of allegiance than that as a priest, to direct the work of his Order and his church.

Verily, “The ways of God are wondrous strange.” Who would have thought that a few months later an infant son would be born to a pioneer couple in the backwoods of Kentucky, in a rude log hut, who was destined to, fifty years later, with one blow, defeat the cautiously laid plans of the Vatican, its Jesuits, the Romanoffs of Russia, the Hapsburgs of Austria and the King of Prussia!

I have often pictured the baby Lincoln playing about the humble log cabin in the Kentucky woods, whose life was no different from the infant life of other children of the pioneers, except in the greater degree of poverty, and wondered if by chance in her day dreams, Nancy Hanks Lincoln could have glimpsed the perspective in which her baby boy was destined to become the savior of this Popular Government; if, when she gathered him to her proud motherly heart, quieting him to sleep with a crooning lullaby, which all mothers sing, the noble but storm-tossed future, of the child she snuggled might by chance, like summer lightning, have flashed over her vision? And, in my mind’s eye, I pictured the meeting on the other side of the Great Divide of this mother and son on the morning of April 15th, 1865, and the happy look of triumph in her glistening eyes as she beheld him in the immortal garb of martyrdom which his enemies had inadvertently placed upon him.

by Dr. Ron Powell

1 Here you have it. Straight from the devil’s mouth! The Catholic Church is a political organization masquerading as a religious organization that has its tentacles in every country. These tentacles are ready to do what is wished by the head to destroy any country and bring that country into subjection to the old anti-christ sitting on the throne in Rome!

2 This means that the one swearing the oath will become as a robot doing whatever he is told. He will not even question if what he is asked is morally right or wrong. He will do it because the Pope or one of his devils has asked it be done. This includes murdering in many horrible manners, even to the ripping open of women’s wombs and taking the baby out and smashing his head against a wall or rock!

3 And they did go into all of the world with their inquisition. They murdered and made slaves of the American Indians, the people of Chile, of Peru, of Columbia, of all of Mexico, South and Central America, most of Europe and sometimes in England when they placed Catholic rulers on the throne. The Catholic Church literally went unto the ends of the earth to murder, steal land, and rape! Go to any big University library and look at all of the books on The Inquisition in the various countries. They will be such titles as: The Inquisition in Chile, The Inquisition in Peru, The Inquisition in Spain, etc.

4 This word means: To eradicate; destroy.

5 What kind of religion is this to swear such a thing? Would they actually do it?

6 In the book entitled: The History Of The Evangelical Churches Of The Valleys Of Piemont, By Samuel Morland, Published in 1658 on pages 336 through 384 are the stories and lists of names of hundreds of Bible Believing Waldenses that the Catholic Church ordered murdered. They were buried alive, roasted, boiled, had their babies ripped from the womb and had their heads dashed on rocks and walls, the young girls were raped [some as young as eight years old] as well as women up to ninety years of age. Then they were murdered!

7 In the same book and on the same pages as footnote six we find that the Catholics went into homes and took out the bedridden old saints of God who were unable to run or be carried due to their afflictions. Then they were raped, boiled, the meat was diced from their bones small pieces at a time to prolong their agony, and one young girl had a long sharpened pole inserted into her private part which was thrust upward going through one lung and coming out at her back. In this manner she was hoisted upward and carried around by the Catholic soldiers while they made fun of their human banner. What kind of Christians are in American today? Not many American Christians would be able to suffer such as this!

8 The Catholics did! See History of the Ancient Christians, Published in
1846 by Griffith & Simon.

9 The Catholics did this! See History Of The Waldenses, Reprint published in 1985 by Church History Research & Archives, 220 Graystone Drive, Gallatin, Tennessee 37066, Phone 615 [or is it 423?], 452-0341.

10 The Catholic virtually destroyed the Albingenses. See The Ecclesiastical History Of The Ancient Churches OF Piedmont And Of The Albingenses, which is a reprint of a very old book. Reprinted by the same company as in footnote 9. See also: The History Of The Ancient Vallenses And Albigenses, first published 1838, but reprinted by the same company as in footnote number 9.

11 And they have used the poison cup on at least two of America’s Presidents! Read onward in this book and you will see.

12 People who have a studied knowledge in most all fields of knowledge.