Showing posts with label Gleaner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gleaner. Show all posts

Monday, January 22, 2018

Michael Abrahams | Pope Francis’ hypocrisy



Published:Monday | January 22, 2018 | 12:52 AM

Michael Abrahams



Abrahams


Father Fernando Karadima appeared to be a really cool guy. A very popular figure in Chile, he was a spiritual leader and father figure for many young men in Santiago, the nation’s capital. Based in the parish Parroquia El Bosque, he mingled with the rich and famous, including some of the city’s most influential families. According to The New York Times, “Impeccably dressed and with perfectly groomed nails and slicked-back hair, Father Karadima cut an aristocratic figure, appealing to both young and old in Chile's elite.”

But there was a dark and sinister side to Karadima. In 1984, a group of parishioners filed a report about his improper conduct to Archbishop Juan Francisco Fresno, but, according to a court statement by one of the parishioners, the letter was “torn up and thrown away”.

In 2003, Cardinal Francisco Javier Errázuriz Ossa was informed by parishioner José Murillo about Karadima’s alleged abuses. However, the cardinal’s response was to tell Murillo that he was praying for him. No investigation was opened. It was not until 2004, twenty years after the first reports were made, that the first investigation into Karadima’s perverted activities was opened by the Catholic Church. Two years later, the investigator stated that he found "the accusers to be credible” and suggested that action be taken. Unfortunately, the cardinal stopped the investigation for more than three years, claiming to be waiting for more evidence and because he thought the allegations were beyond the statute of limitations.

In April 2010, a civil criminal complaint was filed by four men who claimed to have been abused by Karadima. But after seven months of conducting the probe, the claims were dismissed by the court, ruling that there was not enough evidence to charge him. The accusers’ lawyer, Juan Pablo Hermosilla, claimed that the state prosecutor had gathered testimony from dozens of witnesses that “established a pattern of decades of abusive behaviour”, but that the judge, Leonardo Valdivieso, never gave the parties access to the investigation report until the day he closed the case, and withheld testimony and other evidence that could have advanced it.

The judge also dismissed the case without having Father Karadima face his accusers, as they had requested, after defence lawyers presented the court with medical certificates asserting that the priest could have a heart attack if forced to do so.

Finally, in 2011, after several years of a Catholic canonical investigation, the Vatican found Karadima guilty of sexually and psychologically abusing minors and sent him to retire to a "life of prayer and penitence" and to "lifelong prohibition from the public exercise of any ministerial act, particularly confession and the spiritual guidance of any category of persons”.

Karadima had trained 50 priests and four bishops. One of those bishops, Juan Barros Madrid, who moved in his inner circle, figured prominently in the scandal, as victims of abuse claimed that he knew about Karadima’s abusive behaviour, but did nothing about it. One victim claimed that Bishop Barros even witnessed him being abused.

Pope Francis had vowed to take abuse of children by clergy seriously, even setting up a Pontifical Commission for the Protection of Minors in 2014. Last week, while visiting Chile, Francis expressed “pain and shame” over the abuse scandal and begged for victims’ forgiveness, meeting and weeping with survivors of abuse.

However, he revealed his true colours when he made statements in support of Barros. In an about-turn, Francis strongly defended him, saying, “The day someone brings me proof against Bishop Barros, then I will talk. But there is not one single piece of evidence. It is all calumny! Is that clear?”


Thursday, December 20, 2012

No Hatred From Seventh-Day Adventists


No Hatred From Seventh-Day AdventistsPublished: Thursday | December 20, 2012


Colin Gyles

Colin Gyles, Guest Columnist

It is contrary to the principles and ethos of Seventh-day Adventism to hate people, whether Catholics, Muslims, Protestants, atheists, homosexuals, or any other. If there are Seventh-day Adventists who hate people, it is not on account of their being Seventh-day Adventists.

I am compelled to publicly make these declarations in response to an article published in The Sunday Gleaner, December 16, questioning 'Do Adventists hate Catholics?' by no less a person than the highly respected and eminent Father Richard Ho Lung.

It is an unfortunate and gross misunderstanding that would cause anyone to even entertain a question as to whether Seventh-day Adventists hate anyone. I speak on behalf of just about every Seventh-day Adventist that I have known.

First of all, I wish to establish my authority for being able to speak in this manner and also to make it absolutely clear that I am not speaking on behalf of the Seventh-day Adventist Church organisation. I have declared myself publicly to be of historic Seventh-day Adventist faith and also non-denominational. So I do not represent any church.

I was born and bred a Seventh-day Adventist, baptised in the church, served in various capacities, including youth leader and even elder at Kencot Seventh-day Adventist Church, one of the largest churches in Jamaica. My late father served for more than 50 years as an elder of the church, my late mother was a dedicated Adventist almost her entire life. All my siblings and close family members continue in the church and serve in various capacities, and I continue to hold to the faith.

I certainly do not hate Catholics and was never taught to do so. I have many very good friends who are Catholics. I did sixth form at St Catherie High School, a Roman Catholic school, and was even head boy there and a member of the board of governors of that school, being the student representative on the board.

I sent my son to Campion College, a school run by the Roman Catholic Jesuits, where he obtained a good education and represented the school in sports. No one can question the value added to our society and the world by Food For The Poor, a Roman Catholic-founded institution, and so many others.

Likewise, I could not hate Seventh-day Adventists, notwithstanding the well-publicised differences that I hold with respect to some of their currently held doctrines, notably the Trinity belief, which I reject and which was also rejected by the Seventh-day Adventist pioneers. To hate them would mean hating my closest family members. I was taught to love everybody.

A part of the Seventh-day Adventist philosophy is to love people, even if you disagree with their views. Even today, within the fellowship that I worship on Sabbaths, I hold different views from some of the other leading brethren. But we worship together, eat lunch together, love each other, and still vigorously advocate and defend our views in very lively theological discussions.

Where is the misunderstanding?

No one can question the value added to our society and the world by Andrews Hospital, Northern Caribbean University, and other Seventh-day Adventist institutions.

So, where does this misunderstanding arise that could possibly lead anyone to question whether or not Seventh-day Adventists hate Catholics?

I think it stems from a misunderstanding of Seventh-day Adventist theology. As someone of Seventh-day Adventist background, I know that there is a general interpretation among Adventists that certain biblical symbols represent the Roman Catholic system. It is the generally held view by Seventh-day Adventists, both historical and denominational, that Roman Catholics do not have the full understanding of spiritual truth and, like so many others in the world, could be better enlightened regarding some points of faith.

But when one feels that people misunderstand something and make mistakes because they do not know better, the feeling towards them is not to hate them, but to lovingly enlighten them.

So, I join with Father Ho Lung in encouraging not only Adventists and Catholics, but all humanity to love one another and live in harmony.

Dr Colin Gyles is a lay preacher of Philadelphia Fellowship, a historic Seventh-day Adventist Christian ministry. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com and cagyles@yahoo.com.

Source



P.S.

And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. 
- Matthew 23:9.
.
.
.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Do Adventists Hate Catholics?


Published: Sunday | December 16, 2012




Richard Ho Lung, Contributor

I did not understand that Roman Catholics are considered the Antichrist, the evil enemy of true Christianity, by the Seventh-day Adventists. I did not take it seriously that the Pope is considered by the Adventists as the Devil himself. I thought that all this was the idea of some fanatic few from the Adventists. Finally, I did not know that Adventists were taught to hate Catholics.

It grieves me, since Christian unity is such an important matter for our times in a world so fragmented by hatred and violence. But I also understand that it is part of the Adventist belief that all attempts at Christian unity are to be regarded with distrust, as an attempt to water down the scriptures. It was predicted that there would be an attempt to unite all religions, including pagan beliefs, in order to dilute and eventually destroy Christianity.

CHRISTIAN UNITY

I, for one, will continue to work for Christian unity; it is the only way to address the terrible destruction of morality in the West and in the world at large. There is a secular materialism which contrives to destroy the world, headed by extreme feminism, abortion, an exaggerated emphasis on sexual promiscuity, the disbelief in the soul and everlasting life, the rejection of ascetic spirituality, the never-ending variety of material pleasure, suicide, and euthanasia.

I admire Adventists for their strictness in living out the Word of God. I am comforted by their love of the Bible and moral principles that are according to the natural law of God. I love their singing and preaching, and their sense of respect in their dress and their language, and their sense of fellowship. I have enjoyed the company of Adventists at our monastery, though I've never been invited to their church.

Let me explain to my Adventist brethren three points that seem to be major issues. Roman Catholics do not worship Mary, the mother of Jesus. We honour her; she is the virgin mother of Jesus and, therefore, the mother of God. Though she is the mother of Christ, the second person of the Blessed Trinity, she is not a goddess, she is not divine as Christ is. She is co-redemptrix in so far as she consented to be the mother of the Lord by her faith-filled 'fiat' as she encountered the angel Gabriel.

Mary has been chosen by God to be the mother of Jesus; therefore, she is the most blessed of all women. There is no other like her. In so far as she said yes to being Christ's mother, she agreed to the Redeemer's birth through her, and, in this sense, is considered co-redeemer. However, it is not the same as being Christ the Redeemer.

The second point is the fidelity of Roman Catholics to the Pope. Pope means 'pappa', not Father as in the sense of Abba. There is only one Father in heaven: God the Father. The Roman Catholic 'pappa' is equivalent to Peter, who made his profession of faith to Jesus: "You are Christ, the Son of the living God." Because of his great faith, Christ tells Peter: "I will give you the keys of the kingdom." (Matthew 16:16-19) Therefore, a succession of Popes or 'pappas' have been appointed by the Church historically and sequentially to be chief shepherd.

Our Adventist brethren see in the Book of Revelation many indications of 666 pointing to the Roman Catholic Church and its leader. I am not able to agree on that point, though, honestly, I know of past historical errors or sins of the past leaders of the Catholic Church. Still, the system is true and good, as it is the only system in the world, whether secular or sacred, that has lasted more than 2,000 years, despite its ups and downs.

Even in the case of Peter, our first pappa, the Lord reprimanded him right after being appointed the first shepherd who would follow after Him. Christ announced that He would be crucified, and Peter rebuked Him, "God forbid! This shall never happen to you!" Jesus replied, "Get behind me, Satan, you are a hindrance to me!"

THE CHURCH WILL PREVAIL

The Church - its leaders and other members - is weak and sinful. Still, as a deposit of truth, the Catholic Church is systematic, traditional, and a great source of God's abundant works of mercy, spiritual, as well as corporal. Are there sins and weaknesses? Yes, there are, even as in the case of Peter. But it is founded by Christ, and it will prevail.

Just as you and I are sinners, but somehow by His love and mercy, He has appointed us to be special servants of His kingdom. Likewise, He has appointed the Roman Catholic shepherd, the Pope. All that we can do is to move forward in humility and a sense of astonishment at God's calling despite our sins.

As for the Sabbath being Saturday, that it is kept as the holy day is a beautiful matter, but other Christians worship the Lord on a Sunday because it is the day of His Resurrection. It doesn't seem to affect the essential nature of the Christian faith. It really ought not to divide us or cause us to hate and mistrust one another.

There is much to do in order to battle the Evil One today. Let us not battle and tear down each other. The world is in jeopardy; there is much darkness and sin. I believe that soon there will be the Second Coming of Christ.

Let us be attentive to the work at hand. The Word of God is more than we could ever agree on and fulfil in our allotted time on earth. Let us be one by the power of the Word, and prepare for the coming of the Lord.

Fr Richard Ho Lung is founder and superior general of the Missionaries of the Poor. Email feedback to columns@gleanerjm.com and mopfathergeneral@missionariesofthepoor.org.


.

Monday, August 15, 2011

GG missing from national duties

Published: Monday | August 8, 2011



THE EDITOR, Sir:

SATURDAY, August 6, marked the 49th anniversary of Jamaica's Independence. It is to be noted that His Excellency the Governor General, Sir Patrick Allen, was absent from the National Independence Parade held on the lawns of King's House, a national duty he is required under the Jamaican Constitution to carry out, having sworn and received his instrument of office at Buckingham Palace.

My question is whether Sir Patrick is on duties overseas, or his absence was on the grounds of religious belief? The instrument of office requires any holder of the said office to execute his functions without his own prejudice to race, creed or religion and, as such, it cannot be that because Independence day falls on a Saturday, a day on which he worships, the functions of the governor general will have to be deputised.

The affairs of Jamaica belongs to the people via the process of democracy and, as such, is larger than any singular rights to religion. Therefore, its duties must be carried out by all on any given day. If the issue of religion conflicts with national duties, then in the interest of the nation, all those holding such an office, including the GG, should humbly resign.

Winston R. MOLLISON

Old Harbour

St Catherine

Source

Related

Of absent GG and fabulous NDTC

Published: Friday | August 12, 2011


Chester Francis-Jackson, Gleaner Writer

Then my daahlings, people are still talking about the governor general's fortuitous absence from the Independence Day celebrations and official functions. And for those who do not get it - the fact that Sir Patrick Allen went to church on the 7th, in Washington, in no way absolves him of the clear dereliction of his duties by being absent on the 6th, here in Jamaica, the Day of Independence.

Sadly, there were those who were casting monetary bets that the GG would be absent, due to the fact that the 6th was a Saturday, and unfortunately those casting the bets in favour of his absence, won - whatever the reason(s) or justification!

This is a pity, as the absence of the GG, our head of State, from our Independence celebrations, cannot be explained or excused away on religious grounds or worse yet, that he was on official leave, as no leave should have been approved for him at this critical juncture.

The GG being a man of the cloth knows fully the requirements of his religion and should learn the requirements of his office. And where there is obvious inherent conflict, he needs to resolve same, with his conscience as his guide, but the country, should not have to face this unpleasant scenario again. ... more

Source
.