“Fear as a Blueprint for Global Control”: COVID Conference in Brussels

“Fear as a Blueprint for Global Control”: COVID Conference in Brussels

The Financial Express 

Oct 28, 2026  

Hosted by MEPs Christine Anderson and Gerolf Annemans in Brussels, the conference “Pandemic Politics: Fear as a Blueprint for Global Control” features physician Dr Wolfgang Wodarg and pharmacist and microbiologist Freija Van den Driessche discussing their criticisms of the COVID-19 pandemic response. The speakers argue that fear was used to encourage public compliance, question the handling of vaccine safety and informed consent, and raise concerns about pharmaceutical interests and political accountability. They also warn that pandemic-era policies could provide a model for expanded digital identification, central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) and mass surveillance. The event calls for greater transparency, open scientific debate and scrutiny of government power. These claims and interpretations reflect the speakers’ positions at the conference and should be distinguished from established scientific findings and independently verified evidence.

Human Rights in the Post-Pandemic Era

By Michael Tomlinson September 1, 2026 

In 2020, governments around the world panicked in response to the declaration of a pandemic and imposed drastic interventions to impede the spread of Covid-19, interventions which crushed human rights on an unprecedented scale and without sufficient justification. Yet this was widely accepted, even by human rights organisations. How could this happen? And how could we amend human rights protections to ensure that it does not happen again?

In the aftermath of the Second World War, there was recognition that rights should be codified, leading to the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. These rights are taken to be universal and inalienable.

The Declaration includes declaration of the rights to ‘life, liberty and security of person,’ freedom from torture, equality before the law, freedom of movement, including ‘the right to leave any country including his own, and return to his country,’ freedom to own property, freedom of thought, opinion and expression, freedom of assembly, and the right to education.

These are a mix of fundamental rights and other categories. Fundamental rights are everyone’s birthrights originating in fundamental capabilities or states of being which we all have unless we are actively prevented from exercising them by others.

We do not need to apply for permission to exercise this type of right. The classic case of a fundamental right is freedom of expression. We all have this capability as soon as we can speak (or sign), and no one should take it away from us.

Freedom from torture is fundamental to health and well-being and again is the natural state of being unless torture is inflicted on us.

Freedom of education is in a different category, as education by its nature needs to be provided by someone, a government, or a private organisation, which costs money. There is no fundamental right to have education provided without contributing to the cost of it through fees or taxes, but where it is provided it should be accessible to all on an equal basis. So, this right is really about equity.

Commendably, the Declaration does not include any qualifications to fundamental rights, although it is understood elsewhere that:

They should not be taken away, except in specific situations and according to due process. For example, the right to liberty may be restricted if a person is found guilty of a crime by a court of law.

No one would dispute this exception: even the most libertarian of countries puts people in jail if they break the law (but authoritarian countries have laws that put people in jail for reasons that would never be acceptable in truly democratic counties, for example, insulting the President). Once the possibility of wider exceptions is recognised, however, abuses become possible.

The best justification for exceptions is where someone exercises their own right by contravening someone else’s right. Even in the case of free speech, one of the most fundamental of all rights, it is universally accepted that it is not permissible to advocate for or incite violence, especially against an ethnic or religious group. The most notorious examples of this over the last hundred years have been the Nazi campaign of vilification against the Jews, which led directly to their killing around six million Jewish people in the Holocaust, and the Hutu government incitement of the population against the Tutsi (‘cockroaches’), which led to at least 800,000 deaths. In these cases, a direct line can be drawn between incitement and genocide. In other cases, incitement is more coded and difficult to prove.

Dr. Fauci Predicted a Pandemic Under Trump in 2017 | NowThis

 

Dr. Fauci Predicted a Pandemic Under Trump in 2017 | NowThis

NowThis Impact

May 18, 2020 

‘There will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.’ —  Watch Dr. Anthony Fauci predict a pandemic under the Trump admin back in 2017.\

Transcript: 

0:48

also there will be a surprise outbreak

0:51

and I hope by the end of my relatively

0:53

short presentation you will understand

---------------------------

NOTE:

The 2017 Speech

• The Event: Dr. Fauci spoke on January 10, 2017, at a Georgetown University Medical Center symposium on pandemic preparedness.
• The Quote: He stated, "There is no question that there will be a challenge to the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases... we're extraordinarily confident that we are going to see this in the next few years."

Source

Hantavirus sparks fear, questions for some students in post-COVID world

By Kate Perez and Allison Kiehl Chicago Tribune (TNS)
May 21, 2026

A passenger of the hantavirus-stricken cruise ship MV Hondius is pictured while leaving by military bus after disembarking in the port of Granadilla de Abona on the island of Tenerife in Spain’s Canary Islands on May 11. Adverse weather conditions forced the cruise ship MV Hondius hit by a deadly hantavirus outbreak and anchored off Spain’s Canary Islands to dock before evacuations can be completed, the health ministry said.Jorge Guerrero / AFP


CHICAGO — Brooke Loughman knows that when she opens a social media app, she’ll be flooded with posts, whether she wants to see them or not. Lately, the first-year DePaul University student has found herself scrolling quickly through her feed, trying to avoid information about hantavirus and the wave of anxiety she experiences thinking about the possibility of another pandemic like COVID-19.

“If it is going to be a really big deal, I would rather not prematurely freak out, because if it is going to be like a COVID-19 scale thing again, I’d rather have some sense of normalcy for as long as I can,” said Loughman, who is 19.

Loughman’s thoughts are echoed by students scarred by living through the coronavirus pandemic.

The fresh mix of news and misinformation about hantavirus on social media is stirring up negative emotions for some young people, carried over from living on lockdown. COVID-era anxiety can linger and resurface, even more than half a decade after the pandemic, mental health experts say. The unknowns of a new virus outbreak, coupled with an influx of sometimes unreliable information, can generate fear, dread and anxiety.

In other words, the aftereffects of COVID-19 are still present, according to Tara Leytham Powell, an associate professor of social work at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “All the impacts of that, the loss of income, the social isolation, the fear of the illness, all those things still exist in people’s minds,” Powell, who is currently researching COVID’s lasting impacts on mental health.

WHO Conducts Global Pandemic Simulation Exercise Polaris II

 WHO Conducts Global Pandemic Simulation Exercise Polaris II

Global Health Emergency Preparedness Exercise Completed

The World Health Organization (WHO) concluded Exercise Polaris II on April 23, 2026—a comprehensive 2-day simulation designed to test international pandemic response capabilities. The exercise brought together 26 countries and territories, 600 health emergency experts, and over 25 partner organizations to practice coordinated responses to a fictional emerging pathogen outbreak.

Exercise Scope and Participation

Participating nations spanned all WHO regions, including Bangladesh, Brazil, Colombia, France, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Philippines, Thailand, and others. The simulation activated real emergency coordination structures across participating countries, allowing health officials to practice information sharing, policy alignment, and workforce surge deployment under realistic conditions.

Key Frameworks Tested

The exercise operationalized two WHO frameworks:

1. Global Health Emergency Corps (GHEC) – Guides countries in strengthening emergency health workforce capacity based on sovereignty, equity, and solidarity
2.  National Health Emergency Alert and Response Framework – Outlines essential coordination systems and response functions at local, sub-national, and national levels

The simulation also explored AI-enabled tools for workforce organization and planning.

WHO brings countries together to test collective pandemic response

4 April 2025 News release Geneva 

Over the past two days, WHO convened more than 15 countries and over 20 regional health agencies, health emergency networks and other partners to test, for the first time, a new global coordination mechanism for health emergencies.

The two-day simulation, Exercise Polaris, tested WHO’s Global Health Emergency Corps (GHEC), a framework designed to strengthen countries’ emergency workforce, coordinate the deployment of surge teams and experts, and enhance collaboration between countries.

The exercise simulated an outbreak of a fictional virus spreading across the world.

Participating countries included Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Ethiopia, Germany, Iraq, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mozambique, Nepal, Pakistan, Qatar, Somalia Uganda and Ukraine, with additional countries as observers. Each country participated through its national health emergency coordination structure and worked under real-life conditions to share information, align policies and activate their response.

Regional and global health agencies and organizations, including Africa CDC, European CDC, IFRC, IOM, UNICEF and established emergency networks such as the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, the Emergency Medical Teams initiative, Stand-by partners and the International Association of National Public Health Institutes, worked together to support country-led responses. More than 350 health emergency experts connected globally through this exercise.

“This exercise proves that when countries lead and partners connect, the world is better prepared,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “No country can face the next pandemic alone. Exercise Polaris shows that global cooperation is not only possible – it is essential.”

Throughout the simulation, countries led their own response efforts while engaging with WHO for coordination, technical guidance and emergency support. The exercise provided a rare opportunity for governments to test preparedness in a realistic environment, one where trust and mutual accountability were as critical as speed and capacity.

Priemere: Inside mRNA Vaccines

Trump, Fauci, Pardons & Pandemics - Christian J Pinto

 

Christian J Pinto Trump, Fauci, Pardons & Pandemics 

Darkness Exposed 

 Chris discusses the incredible changes being made by the new Trump administration, as the president issues a series of executive orders, along with pardons for the pro life protestors and J-6 prisoners. Also discussed is the preemptive pardon Joe Biden issued for Dr. Fauci before he left office. Was it one Jesuit to another? We also review what happened with the coronavirus pandemic and consider what direction pandemics may be headed in the future. Will globalists attempt another lock down of society?

Bombshell COVID report reveals potential coverups

CBDC | No Buy, No Sell Coming Soon! Digital Currency New One World Gover...

'If That's Not An Attack On Religious Liberty...': Miller-Meeks Claims Threats To 'God-Given Rights'

The Jesuits and the Covid Pandemic

The Jesuits and the Covid Pandemic



Some might say that talk of the Jesuits is pure speculation and just one of the many conspiracy theories in a sea of confusion. Ignorance of history is at the heart of such accusation. Steve Mathews of Trinity Foundation Radio reached out to Stuart Quint and Greg Bentley of the Berean Beacon to discuss the Jesuits in the Covid pandemic.

 
The radio program uncovers the historic purpose of the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order and we candidly discuss Jesuit plots of old and the common thread that weaves its way through all of today’s tyrannical world leaders. We are clearly seeing the hand of the Roman Catholic Church and her Jesuits manifested in Canada as well as other once free Nations.

Download

Source

Clade X Pandemic Exercise: Segment 1

Event 201 Pandemic Exercise: Highlights Reel

Dr Conrad Vine: It's coming - How 2022 prepared the world for...

HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN 2020? | The Game's Afoot: Episode 4

THE POPE'S VENOM PANDEMIC

 

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the 150th session of the Executive Board — 25 January 2022

WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the 150th session of the Executive Board — 25 January 2022

25 January 2022


Dr Patrick Amoth, Chair of the Executive Board,

Excellencies, dear colleagues and friends,

Five years ago, you, the Member States gave me the honour of my life, when you placed your trust in me to lead and transform this vitally important global organisation.

I told you then that my priority was to listen, and that is what I have tried to do.

I listened to you about your priorities and ideas, and what you expect from your WHO.

And I listened to those who know WHO best – our workforce, my colleagues – for their ideas about how to make this Organization the best it can be.

Those ideas became the basis of the transformation, to make WHO an Organization that can deliver a measurable difference to health in countries, in six ways:

By the way, I would like to share with you that I continue to listen to our staff every week on Thursdays, to listen to their advice and innovative ideas. The culture has continued. When I was Minister of Health and Minister of Foreign Affairs in Ethiopia, I used the same thing, listening on Thursday to my staff, because listening is the basis. If you listen, the next steps will be okay.

From listening to Member States and staff, a new strategy – the 13th General Programme of Work – to move us from a focus on outputs to a focus on outcomes has been developed;

New processes, to make us more efficient and effective;

A new operating model, moving from an organization that is fragmented towards one that is integrated, aligned and agile;

A new approach to partnerships, moving from risk aversity to risk management;

A new approach to financing, to move us towards a more sustainable and predictable funding model;

And a new culture, built on a shared commitment to service, professionalism, integrity, collaboration and compassion.

That was the product of listening to Member States and listening to my colleagues, my staff.

Then, as you know, two years ago, COVID-19 changed everything. But the transformation – built on the ideas and energy of our staff – had positioned us to respond more rapidly and effectively than to any previous emergency.

Let me take a moment to share a story from the beginning of the pandemic that really touched my heart and gave me energy and inspiration.

On December 31st 2019, New Year’s Eve, as most of the world was having a party, our WHO colleagues were at work, scanning potential signals as they do 365 days a year.

And that's when they saw the first signal about a cluster of cases of viral pneumonia of unknown cause, from a website in Wuhan.

They didn’t say it could wait until the New Year, they acted immediately, alerting me and others.

The next day, January 1st, they didn’t take a holiday, they continued to work to verify the signal, and the next day, January 2nd, they confirmed it, triggering the response across the entire organization.

They said we have a new disease which is serious, they didn’t have a New Year’s Eve, a New Year’s celebration, working throughout – and me too, although I took my first holiday since I joined WHO, and I remember that I was in Dubai, but it wasn’t a holiday for them and it wasn’t a holiday for me. That was the first holiday in 5 years for me, and that didn’t even work, because of the bad news.

Dr Anthony Fauci's 2018 interview on flu dangers and future virus pandem...

What’s Next? Preparing for Future Pandemics with Anthony Fauci