Hannity has a message for Pope Leo XIV

Iran: A regime led by people whose purpose is to usher in the END OF THE WORLD

 

 

Original Marco Rubio interview 

Speaker Johnson Sits Down with Sean Hannity

Sara Carter Tells Sean Hannity FBI Director Wray Might Fire McCabe Over ...

Julian Assange Confidential everyone in positions of government

Ferre Report

Published on Oct 8, 2016

Economic collapse and financial crisis is rising any moment.
Getting informed about collapse and crisis may earn you, or prevent to lose money. Do you want to be informed just follow us in this channel.. Please click above to subscribe to my channel
SUBSCRIBE for Latest on FINANCIAL CRISIS / OIL PRICE / GLOBAL ECONOMIC COLLAPSE / AGENDA 21 / DOLLAR COLLAPSE / GOLD / SILVER / BITCOIN / GLOBAL RESET / NEW WORLD ORDER / ECONOMÝC COLLAPSE - .

Real-time Libya: Who knew what, when?

Posted at 09:45 AM ET, 10/11/2012

By Jennifer Rubin

Liz Cheney on Fox News last night spoke about the Libya fiasco, zeroing in on the actions of Charlene Lamb, the State Department official who denied requested security but also followed events in Libya on 9/11/2012 in real time :

She followed minute by minute. She, and one would presume the State Department higher-ups, were then aware there was an organized assault on the consulate. My gosh, if only she had briefed Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice or gotten to the president before his Sept. 25 speech to the United Nations so many false impressions could have been prevented. There would never have been any confusion about a spontaneous film protest, right?

Seriously, something doesn’t make sense. Do we think no one else ever got the benefit of that information that mid-level bureaucrat Charlene Lamb had? This was the most urgent issue of the moment in which everyone (the White House, the public, the media) wanted to know what happened in Benghazi. So why not look at the real-time video? Why not ask Lamb what she saw and heard?

If Rice was going on five Sunday news shows to give the official account of events, wouldn’t she have had the benefit of that information? If the White House spokesman was going to come out day after day to tell what happened, wouldn’t Lamb’s real time-intelligence be the first thing he’d be told about?

You have to either assume Lamb kept this critical information under wraps or that she did send it into the stream of intelligence that was used by the secretary of state and the White House. If the latter, why did so many people, including the president, tell a story that wasn’t true?

One other incident deserves immediate, further scrutiny. On Sept. 28, not the Director of National Intelligence James Clapper but his spokesman put out a statement saying that the intelligence community had given wrong information about the attack. It read in part: “As the Intelligence Community collects and analyzes more information related to the attack, our understanding of the event continues to evolve. In the immediate aftermath, there was information that led us to assess that the attack began spontaneously following protests earlier that day at our embassy in Cairo. We provided that initial assessment to Executive Branch officials and members of Congress, who used that information to discuss the attack publicly and provide updates as they became available. Throughout our investigation we continued to emphasize that information gathered was preliminary and evolving.”

Did DNI not have access to the same information that Lamb did? It was a curious statement even before Lamb testified, giving no time frame as to when DNI knew it was a terrorist attack. Lt. Col. Andrew Wood knew it was a terror attack immediately, he testified. We had intercepts between the attackers and al-Qaeda operatives within 24 hours. So why was DNI giving out information to support a theory unsupported by existing information? Maybe it is time for Clapper, not his spokesman, to come testify as well.

We are reaching that point in the course of all scandals in which the participants fall into two camps — the honest public servants and whistleblowers, on one side, and the rest, who by omission or commission have helped deceive the public. History, not to mention U.S. attorneys, are not kind to the latter, most especially when they aren’t candid under oath. So now is the time for those in the State Department and the intelligence agencies to come clean, tell us who knew what when and let the chips fall where they may. Better to tell the story than have it told by others, don’t you think?

By Jennifer Rubin  |  09:45 AM ET, 10/11/2012 

Source

Sean Hannity, Carrie Prejean, others splash through San Diego

August 8, 8:41 AM
San Diego Community Issues Examiner
Alberto Vargas



Riding an increasingly rising tide of conservatism that is strongly reverberating nationwide, Sean Hannity, along with Mark Levin, Brian Bilbray, Carrie Prejean, and Leann Tweeden, among others, swept through San Diego on Friday at the Cricket Wireless Amphiteater in Chula Vista.

Being one of eight nationwide Freedom Concerts set for 2009, musical acts like Billy Ray Cyrus, Michael W. Smith, Lee Greenwood, and The Charlie Daniel’s Band, took to the stage, honoring America and the heroes who fight and die to keep us safe.

Also in attendance was Rick Roberts, local radio personality, well-known conservative, and one of the many critics voicing outrage over President Obama’s increasingly arrogant and dismissive approach to those who dare question his policies and political intentions.

Made glaringly obvious by the town-hall style meetings that have gone awry across the country, Democrats and in particular those on the far left (secular progressives, liberals) who seek to unquestionably embrace everything Obama proposes are faced with a collapsing power base not very long ago attained. The power they so much salivated over and proudly snatched during the most recent elections is now slipping from their hands.

Former president Bush and his policies, though very unpopular on his way out, both with conservatives and liberals, is beginning to look increasingly more palatable in comparison to our current president and his decisions.

President Obama has not set out to unify the nation. In fact, the nation, it seems, has not been more strongly divided in quite a long time. Those who’ve supported the president, whether policy makers like Nancy Pelosi or those in the general public, tend to be suffering from the same blindness he suffers, which is brought upon by an incomprehensible level of arrogance and detachment from “real” Americans.

Pelosi recently mocked the town hall Americans voicing their opinions as “astro turf” rather than “grass roots.” Couldn’t she just respectfully agree to disagree? Is the mocking of concerned Americans, from an elected public official, necessary and politically intelligent? Maybe she feels she is untouchable.

For these kinds of reasons, the nation, one could argue, is now engaged in a political civil war. Yet, sadly what seems to most accurately reflect the nature of those on the left is hostility and intolerance. Coming from a former Democrat (now an Independent) and someone who voted for President Clinton – TWICE! – and even Al Gore, it’s obvious that the Democratic Party, which once stood for the working class, for family, for tradition, and the constitutional right of freedom of speech, has been hijacked by hostile special interest groups, which aim to silence others’ voices. http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-11974-San-Diego-Community-Issues-Examiner~y2009m8d7-A-reflection-Metallica-freedom-of-speech-and-the-growing-power-of-our-government

The key word here is “hostile.” Whether it’s in the vast and growing blogosphere, television, or magazines, the voices from the left are consistently reverberating with hostility, intolerance, anger, hatred even, and arrogance. What has become of the democratic party?

They tend to ridicule – like no doubt they will this writer and this article – anyone who stands in opposition to their views. They aim to defame and discredit the conservative individual, using “hypocrisy” as their preferred weapon. Imperfect Christians who tend to be fully aware of their human vulnerabilities, yet seek to please God and country are painted as religious radicals, zealots, and un-American.

Carrie Prejean who today said on the Sean Hannity show, “It’s okay to be conservative. It’s okay to believe in traditional family values,” has been mercilessly dragged through the mud, yet gladly she remains strong; in fact, stronger than before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsnB_Rz_sy0&feature=player_embeddedhttp://


Leftists increasingly engage in discourse, not with civility, dignity, discipline, and respect for other Americans with differing views, but belittlement, mockery, and defamation.

This, ultimately, will be their demise. The American people will stand for this no longer. Republicans? A disappointing group of individuals who meekly hold their finger up in the air to see which way the wind is blowing, so that they can follow accordingly, better wake up and stand for something, or they too will find themselves on the outside looking in.

Ultimately, God and love of country must prevail. Those that ridicule, debase, mock, and seek to deconstruct that which is good and replace it with moral relativism, are arrogantly unaware that they’re sewing the seeds of everyone’s demise, including their’s.

You're more than welcome to voice your opinion now. Please prove us wrong in doing so, using civility, throughtfulness, respect, dignity, and constructive dissent, if that's what you choose.


For more info: http://www.760kfmb.com/
.
Source: http://www.examiner.com/x-11974-San-Diego-Community-Issues-Examiner~y2009m8d8-Sean-Hannity-Carrie-Prejean-others-splash-through-San-Diego

.