Showing posts with label March for Marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label March for Marriage. Show all posts

Monday, September 01, 2014

Church ladies tough it out poolside when it comes to same-sex marriage





Gary Lyon, of Leechburg, Pa., left, and Bill Samford, of Hawley, Pa., celebrate after a June 2014 vote allowing Presbyterian pastors discretion in marrying same-sex couples. (David Guralnick/AP)



By Steven Petrow Columnist, Civilities September 1 at 11:22 AM Follow @StevenPetrow

Dear Civilities: Last week I was at the pool with my young kids when a new member of the club, also a mom, started chatting with me — asking me the ages of my children, where my people were from, and so on. Everything was going nicely until she asked me what church we belong to. I didn’t think for one second not to answer directly and said Presbyterian. Immediately, this woman said, “You know they’re allowing gays to marry now and our clergy to marry them. We’ve had to find a new church.” Honestly, some of my best friends are gay and for a sec I thought about pushing her into the pool. But, actually, I was flummoxed, especially with my children splashing around and simply said, “I’ve gotta go look after my kids.” Then, I felt I had let down my gay friends by not saying anything. What could I have done instead?” – Name withheld, Greensboro, NC

Steven Petrow, the author of “Steven Petrow’s Complete Gay & Lesbian Manners,” addresses questions about LGBT and straight etiquette in his column, Civilities. View Archive

A: I know that for many Presbyterians in the United States, the recent vote in the church allowing pastors to officiate at same-sex weddings (in states where it’s legal, which does not include your state of North Carolina) has been seen as a calamity. One self-described “Jesus-loving, Bible-based” blogger has written bluntly that, “This is a recipe for disaster and is nothing less than rebellion against the authority of the Word. . . . Now is the time to make your exit.”

I understand that a vocal minority feel this way — but that’s really no justification for this mom to make assumptions about your beliefs — or to make what amounts to a political broadside, poolside. Your fantasy about dunking her in the pool was completely appropriate under the circumstances but I’m glad that you know the rule: Just because you’re thinking something doesn’t mean you need to say or do it. Let’s call it the lost art of impulse control.

What else could you have done? Well, let me tell you how some of those on my Facebook page responded to your predicament.

a) She could have said: “Yes, I know and I’m so happy about that. It’s one of the reasons we like that church.”

b) I would have asked: “And that’s a problem, why?” Then, I would inquire how she would feel if heterosexual privilege were reversed and only same-sex couples could marry, adopt kids, show affection in public, have each others’ insurance benefits, be free of fear of shunning or assault.

c) This reminds me of the AIDS episode of “Designing Women,” when the character Julia Sugarbaker calmly tells her anti-gay friend, “I’m terribly sorry, but I’m going to have to ask you to move your car . . . ’cause you’re leaving!”

My answer is “d”— None of the above. I think your response was spot-on. Despite the well-delivered snark we hear daily, most of us don’t walk around with an arsenal of retorts and barbs ready to be deployed at a moment’s notice. Naturally you were “flummoxed” by this mom’s out-of-the-blue remark. (Not to mention that your focus was rightfully on those kids of yours splashing about in the pool.)

I actually like the effect that your action had, which was to stop any further conversation. Advocacy can take many forms, and your refusal to acknowledge the remark or engage with her was reflexively perfect. Like many others, this gay man posting on my Facebook site appreciated your non-verbal rebuff:

“After reading this letter . . . I can say as a gay man that I do not feel let down. I think the writer spoke volumes with her response. Physically removing yourself from the presence of someone who is spewing hate shows that you want nothing to do with them or their ideas. This gave her no audience, no soap box, nothing.”

But the pain within the church cuts both ways. Recently, I spoke with a Presbyterian pastor who told me the very sad story of how her gay uncle’s ostracism from the Church led to his suicide in 2006. “I believe that had my uncle received an affirming message from the Presbyterian Church as a youth, he might well be alive today,” she said. “He was a gay man who could never fully reconcile that reality with his deep and abiding faith.”

Finally, one last piece of advice: Before the pool gets too cool for swimming, why don’t you invite some of your gay friends to join you? There’s no better way to pave the road toward acceptance than to allow all your friends to mix, mingle and splash about. And, for those like the mom who is leaving her church over the same-sex marriage issue: Don’t assume others share your point of view. You got off lucky – and dry.


Source
.

Thursday, June 19, 2014

March for Marriage 2014 - The Gala


THE GALA

Join us the evening of June 19th — following the March for Marriage and Marriage Lobby Day — for the First Annual National Organization for Marriage Gala, featuring keynote speaker Dr. Benjamin Carson!



Dr. Benjamin Carson
Biography


Brian S. Brown


Robert P. George
Biography

A gathering of pro-family leaders and advocates from around the nation, the NOM Gala reception and gala will be a celebration of the cherished institution that served as the very bedrock of our civilization: the family founded on the union of husband and wife. We hope you will join us as we hear from leaders in the fight to protect marriage and honor champions in the movement. Cocktail attire is requested.

6:30 PM — Reception and Cocktails

7:30 PM — Dinner and Program

The Willard Intercontinental Hotel
1401 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20004

A discounted room block is available at the Willard for our out-of-town guests. Call 202.628.9100 to make a reservation, and mention the NOM. Reservations must be made by May 19, 2014.

THE NOM GALA IS SOLD OUT FOR THIS YEAR! THANKS FOR YOUR INTEREST!


.

S.F. archbishop leads thousands against gay marriage



Carolyn Lochhead
Updated 2:51 pm, Thursday, June 19, 2014




Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone is seen at the Archdiocese of San Francisco on Thursday, June 6, 2013 in San Francisco, Calif. Photo: Lea Suzuki, The Chronicle









(06-19) 14:41 PDT WASHINGTON -- Kneeling on the sidewalk across from the U.S. Supreme Court, San Francisco's Roman Catholic archbishop led several thousand protesters Thursday in prayer against same-sex marriage.

Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone was the star attraction of a rally in Washington organized by National Organization for Marriage President Brian Brown, the nation's leading opponent of same-sex marriage. Brown tapped Cordileone as the first speaker at the event and had him lead the group in prayer after a march from the west front of the U.S. Capitol to the Supreme Court steps.

The archbishop's attendance was controversial in San Francisco, where officials including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, Mayor Ed Lee and Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom signed letters urging Cordileone not to participate.

Cordileone told the crowd at Thursday's March for Marriage that he has "the support of Pope Francis for what we are doing today," citing approval by the Apostolic Nunciature of the Holy See to the United States, the Vatican's diplomatic mission in Washington. Cordileone chairs the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops subcommittee for the promotion and defense of marriage.

The rally drew predominantly Latino and African American protesters from New York, New Jersey, Virginia and other nearby states, numbering in the low thousands at its peak. Throngs of couples and children spent several hours in sweltering heat listening to speakers, many of them pastors, declare that marriage should be limited to unions of one man and one woman for the sake of children.

Former Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Mike Huckabee also addressed the protesters. Santorum argued that traditional marriage is good for the economy because "every marriage is a little business."

Cordileone told demonstrators that "every child comes from a mother and a father, and to deliberately deprive a child of knowing and being loved" by them is "outright injustice."

"This is our very nature; no law can change it," he said.

He compared the fight over same-sex marriage, where opponents appear to be losing ground daily, to abortion in the 1970s, when the procedure appeared to be gaining widespread acceptance.

But because "a small band of believers held the line on the sanctity of life in the womb," Cordileone said, opposition to abortion grew. Now, he declared, there exists "the most pro-life generation since Roe vs. Wade," the 1973 Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion.

Cordileone predicted that public opinion on same-sex marriage would follow a similar trajectory so that eventually "people will figure out that a child comes from a father and mother."

Cordileone's security detail blocked a reporter from interviewing the prelate during the walk to the court as the crowd was led in a chant of, "One man, one woman."

Joel Feliz, a protester from New York, said he came to the event "praying to God to see if he can do a miracle" and reverse the movement in states and federal courts to legalize same-sex marriage.

Barry Wood, 62, of Richmond, Va., said that once marriage is redefined to be "just about love, then you can make marriage anything you want: three men, four women, anything."

He said he was not surprised by the decline in what he called Judeo-Christian ethics, linking same-sex marriage with abortion and the removal of prayer from schools.

"It's all part of the sad walk into post-Christian society," Wood said. "We're trying to hang on to it."

Carolyn Lochhead is the San Francisco Chronicle's Washington correspondent. E-mail:clochhead@sfchronicle.com. Twitter:@carolynlochhead


.