Showing posts with label National Defense Authorization Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Defense Authorization Act. Show all posts

Monday, December 05, 2011

20 Things You Should Know About the Bill That Could Ruin America

Dec 5, 2011 12:30 PM
By Lauri Apple

Last week the U.S. Senate passed 93-7 a version of the National Defense Authorization Act that includes provisions giving the military the right to detain you forever and without charge if they think you're some kind of terrorist. Consider it an early holiday present! There is no exchange policy, sorry.

President Barack Obama can get rid of the Act's indefinite detention provisions by using his veto powers. He says he might do just that, so there is hope. But Hopey could also change his mind at the last minute and let the language become law. Civil libertarians from all sides of the political spectrum are very anxious about the final call he'll make.

Even though you can't do much to prevent the provisions from taking effect, here's a list of 20 details about them. Maybe the info will come in handy when you finally flee to Saudi Arabia ISO political refugee status and have to explain how your country was oppressing you:
1. The provisions were passed as part of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)—enacted for the last 48 years or so to provide funding for the military and all our wars. (The act for fiscal year 2012 awarded $662 billion for defense spending.) Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and Carl Levin (D-MI) took the lead in promoting them, making passage a bipartisan effort/failure.
2. Initially the provisions passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without a single hearing. The Senate didn't want to spoil the surprise for everybody.
3. Because of the provisions, the NDAA now says the military can detain anyone deemed to be "a part of" or deemed to have "substantially supported" Al Qaeda, the Taliban, or "associated forces." You can be on the battlefield, or you can be PayPaling money to your local terrorist cell while sipping your latte at a Starbucks—doesn't matter. Even though we captured Saddam, Osama, and Anwar al-Awlaki, these powers are still necessary. Don't question.
4. The bill grants power to the military to arrest U.S. citizens on American soil and detain them in military prisons forever without offering them the right to legal counsel or even a trial. This isn't a totally new thing: "dirty bomb" plotter Jose Padilla spent three-and-a-half years as an "enemy combatant" until he was finally charged. But Padilla's detention was unusual and sparked a huge outcry; the new provisions would standardize his treatment and enable us all to become Jose Padillas.
5. Some people are trying to say that language regarding indefinite detention (Section 1031) doesn't apply to American citizens, but it does. However, the mandatory detention requirement (Section 1032) includes an exemption for American citizens, which means the military doesn't have to imprison you forever and ever "unless ordered to do so" by the president. You better remove that Nobama bumper sticker from your truck.
6. The provisions could last as long as fruitcake lasts. We covered this earlier.
7. Many important people oppose the provisions, including FBI Director Robert Mueller, the CIA, the military, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, the head of the Justice Department's National Security Division, the Director of National Intelligence, and your mom (unless she's a U.S. senator).
8. A group of 26 retired generals and admirals wrote a letter to the Senate saying the provisions "reduce the options available to our Commander-in-Chief to incapacitate terrorists," and will "do more harm than good." The Senate obviously ignored them.
9. According to Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who opposes indefinite detention of U.S. citizens, an American can be deemed a "terrorist" after just one hearing. Finally, the government promises to work efficiently on something.
10. Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO) tried to kill the provision on indefinite detention with an amendment that required Congressional review of these brand-new military detention powers, but his effort failed 60 votes to 38.
11. All the Republican senators supported the provisions except for Paul and Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL).
12. Former Vice President Dick Cheney was in attendance for the vote on behalf of the waterboarding lobby. Every time he heard the words "indefinite detention," he got an erection.
13. None of this stuff will ever affect people who are innocent of terrorism-related crimes, unless the government wrongly accuses them.
14. As pointed out by Salon columnist Glenn Greenwald, the provision dispenses with Article 3, Section 3 of the Constitution, which provides that nobody can be punished for treason without heightened due process requirements being met." Goodbye, Art. 3 Sec. 3! Send our regards to the 4th, 8th, and 14th Amendments.
15. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), one of the provisions' most vocal supporters, put it this way to the New York Times: "Citizens who are suspected of joining Al Qaeda are opening themselves up 'to imprisonment and death ... And when they say, "I want my lawyer," you tell them: "Shut up. You don't get a lawyer. You are an enemy combatant, and we are going to talk to you about why you joined Al Qaeda."'" Shut up, fool! Lindsey Graham hates it when you talk.
16. Some of the senators who passed this shit don't really know what they are talking about when they talk about "enemy combatants" and their status under existing law.
17. President Barack Obama has stated he'll veto the provisions because they would "raise serious and unsettled legal questions and would be inconsistent with the fundamental American principle that our military does not patrol our streets." They're also confusing.
18. The provisions will militarize America even further and—in Graham's words—"basically say[s] in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield." Your backyard is a microcosm of the war on terror. Just think of that every time you host a barbecue.
19. They could disappear from the NDAA if the House and Senate conferees who meet in conference committee this week decide to get rid of them.
20. Texas Republicans have somehow worked sex with animals into all this.

Now for the good news: Greenwald at Salon says none of this indefinite detention without a lawyer stuff changes the status quo that much. It only codifies what's already been happening in the U.S. for the past few years. So you've been living under these conditions for a while now, but look—you're still not in jail. Just be more careful about what sorts of opinions on the government you post on Twitter, and don't say anything nice about Al Qaeda, and you'll be fine.

[Image of Guantanamo via AP]
.

The National Defense Authorization Act: Is US learning from autocratic nations


December 5, 2011 | Filed under: National | Posted by: admin

The National Defense Authorization Act is a blot on nation’s face. Is US learning from autocratic nations of Middle East like Syria and Saudi Arabia?

The National Defense Authorization Act has been approved by the Senate with an overwhelming majority. But does it reflect the will of the people? An overwhelming number of people are against this barbaric act that aims to curb the freedom of its own people. The great nation of America seems to be learning a few lessons or two from its friends in the Middle East.

A law that summarily takes away the freedom of its own nationals without giving them a chance to defend themselves in courts of law, was feasible in Syria or Saudi Arabia or for that matter Muammar Qaddafi’s Libya, but not United States that prided in personal freedom and liberty.

This is antithesis of what America stood for and what our forefathers dreamt of making the US. This bill that is called The National Defense Authorization Act would take away all the civil liberties that are given to individuals in the US and would take away the US citizens’ right to fair trial if they are even remotely suspected of being terrorists. This law would allow the agencies and the armed forces to keep them under detention indefinitely without allowing them to approach the courts of law.

People are largely opposed to this draconian law being imposed upon the citizens. Edward Sott says, “This act is ridiculous. It even will have negative impact on musicians and the musical scene as well. What ever happened to the first amendment, the second amendment, hell even The Constitution itself. It’s basically forced FASCISM. Obama better veto this act before the GOVT decides to butt the US under Martial Law so they can enforce this. This is insane.”

Another reader Joe Blow says, “I always made fun of everyone who was talking about NWO but this is actually pretty scary. I’ve been trying to read up a lot on this legislation but I can’t find any benefits of this act. So what are their reasons for passing this? Anyone?”

Meanwhile Luay says, “Nothing strange here, this have been ongoing for the past 10 years or so, and now its time to legalize it in order to protect the people who perpetrate it from prosecution. We all know the extent of damage the Bush administration has befallen onto our beliefs and principles in the name of fight against terror. I knew then and I feel it now… America is no more the country that lead by reason. We are a runaway train, that is driven by morons who are paid not to think….but obey. Who ? We all know, but we dare not say …..”

Another reader says, “McCain and Levin are traitors and deserve to be hung in a public square. Make no mistake, if Abraham Lincoln were here, he would have seen to it that they were arrested, given a fair trial, and then sentenced to death by hanging. McCain and Levin are the internal terrorists. If this law passes, they should be arrested by the military for terrorism and put away indefinitely without trial, charges, or an attorney. Their own law should backfire on them.”

American Civil Liberties Union official Christopher Anders while summing up the adverse impact of the legislation says, “This bill puts military detention authority on steroids and makes it permanent…If it becomes law, American citizens and others are at real risk of being locked away by the military without charge or trial.”