Showing posts with label gang of 8. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gang of 8. Show all posts

Friday, April 26, 2013

What about The Gang of Eight?


Democratic Sens. Chuck Schumer of New York, Richard Durbin of Illinois, Michael Bennet of Colorado and Bob Menendez of New Jersey joined Republican Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Marco Rubio of Florida, Jeff Flake of Arizona and Lindsay Graham of South Carolina,..
The Republican Party (red) or Democratic Party (blue) 

*

Democratic: 
Chuck Schumer of New York, Reform Judaism --- Harvard Law School --- Lawyer
Richard Durbin of Illinois,  Roman Catholicism --- Georgetown University --- Lawyer
Michael Bennet of Colorado, Unaffiliated[2][3] - Judaism ---  Yale Law School --- Lawyer
Bob Menendez of New Jersey, Roman Catholic ---  Rutgers School of Law --- Lawyer

Republican:
John McCain of Arizona, Baptist congregant (brought up Episcopalian)[1] ---  United States Naval Academy --- Politician/Soldier
Marco Rubio of Florida, Christianity, Catholicism ---  University of Miami School of Law --- Lawyer
Jeff Flake of Arizona, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) --- Brigham Young University --- Politician/Missionary
Lindsay Graham of South Carolina, Southern Baptist ---  University of South Carolina School of Law --- Lawyer/Soldier

Statistics:
3 Roman Catholics
2 Jews
2 Baptists
1 Mormon
-------------
8 Total


Peculiar Characteristics of The Gang: 


6 Lawyers
2 Politicians
--------------
8 Total

6 Caucasian Non-Hispanics
2 Cuban-Americans
-------------------------------
8 Total


Other trivial (or maybe not) features:

2 Soldiers
1 Missionary


My outstanding observation of these men is that 6 of them are Lawyers, and that 2 are Cuban-Americans.
Do Lawyers and Cuban-Americans represent the spectrum of the American citizenry?

Can these men's religion, professions or their ethnicity give them a better understanding of Immigration Issues?

BTW: Cubans are mainly refugees (have been so since the Cuban Revolution in 1959), not immigrants per se.


Why are these men The Gang of Eight?

Why are they so willing to legislate Immigration Reform for 11 million Illegal Aliens at a time of ECONOMIC RECESSION, Medicare and Social Security cut-backs?


Arsenio. 

Resources:


http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/gang-eight-urge-lawmakers-join-them-supporting-immigration-201612483--politics.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states
http://www.conservapedia.com/Robert_Menendez
Wikipedia

.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Criminal Illegal Aliens to Receive Amnesty


April 19, 2013 By Michael Volpe



An obscure portion of the new immigration bill authored and negotiated by the bipartisan so-called “Gang of 8″ will allow illegal aliens with multiple misdemeanor convictions to still qualify for immediate legal status and potentially even citizenship down the road.

According to the pertinent portion of the text, those with three or more misdemeanor convictions no longer qualify for immediate legalized status under the new bill. Grounds for ineligibility status include anyone with one or more felony convictions along with three or more misdemeanor convictions. As the text states, only those with “3 or more misdemeanor offense (other than minor traffic offenses or State or local offenses for which an essential element was the alien’s immigration status or violation of this Act) if the alien was convicted on different dates for each of the 3 offenses” will be ineligible.

Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama (R), whose office released this portion of the text, slammed this directive stating that it will lead to criminals being able to gain legal status in a press release.

Alarmingly, the bill leaves intact the single greatest obstacle to immigration reform: the Administration’s abuse of prosecutorial discretion to prevent the enforcement of federal law. It will also provide safe harbor to those who have committed a variety of offenses—ranging from identity theft, to multiple immigration violations, and even those with criminal records.

Front Page Magazine reached out to the offices of Senators Marco Rubio and Chuck Schumer for comment as well, but no message was returned as of the publication of this article.

In December 2012, the Obama administration first reclassified the definition of a dangerous criminal illegal alien as an individual convicted of three rather than one misdemeanor. In that case, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) directive to all ICE agents redefined priorities for all agents to only focus on investigating individuals with at least three misdemeanor convictions.

If passed, this bill will immediately legalize all those illegal aliens who qualify, including those with two misdemeanor convictions or less. The bill further provides a pathway to citizenship which should take a minimum of ten years and presumably will include a number of triggers for border security. The bill also calls for a number of border security measures, including full implementation of the E Verify system, money to build a border fence for the Southern border, as well as extra resources to hire more border patrol agents.

While analysts have focused on the dynamic between the enforcement portions of the bill and how they will interact with the amnesty portions, most observers have assumed that dangerous illegal aliens will all be deported. This latest revelation puts that assumption into question, and that should also be considered and fully explained before any votes on this bill are taken.


.