AND THE THIRD ANGEL FOLLOWED THEM, SAYING WITH A LOUD VOICE, IF ANY MAN WORSHIP THE BEAST AND HIS IMAGE, AND RECEIVE HIS MARK IN HIS FOREHEAD, OR IN HIS HAND.
*** REVELATION 14:9
Sunday, October 02, 2011
It's 3 P.M. on Washington Red Mass Sunday..
...and the news media has not provided a single news story on the event?
Why?
When it's such a big event within the circles of political influence of our government, why?
This reminds me of the New York Times print edition NOT covering Adolfo Nichols ascendency in early 2008, yet there was a NY Times article available only through Wikipedia, and not findable if one went to the NY Times site independently.
A look at that paper's coverage of the Vatican between the 1870s and 1915 speaks volumes about a dynamics of this newspaper becoming far more controlled during the interim:
Isn't it odd that all the articles that cover the red mass this morning are back-dated to last night 10/2/11? When I repeatedly checked on google and yahoo last night for an inkling of the auspicious event until almost midnight, to no avail. Now the media wants me to think that this article they wrote today was actually reported yesterday when it wasn't...
I think that the government officials who attended the 58th Red Mass first had to be briefed (or debriefed) jointly before any media source could say anything about this religious courtship of the U.S. govenment disguised as a Roman Catholic ritual...
2 comments:
This reminds me of the New York Times print edition NOT covering Adolfo Nichols ascendency in early 2008, yet there was a NY Times article available only through Wikipedia, and not findable if one went to the NY Times site independently.
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2008/01/adolfo-nicolas-sjs-elusive-coverage-by.html
A look at that paper's coverage of the Vatican between the 1870s and 1915 speaks volumes about a dynamics of this newspaper becoming far more controlled during the interim:
http://continuingcounterreformation.blogspot.com/2010/07/1892-1915-new-york-times.html
Douglas,
Isn't it odd that all the articles that cover the red mass this morning are back-dated to last night 10/2/11? When I repeatedly checked on google and yahoo last night for an inkling of the auspicious event until almost midnight, to no avail. Now the media wants me to think that this article they wrote today was actually reported yesterday when it wasn't...
I think that the government officials who attended the 58th Red Mass first had to be briefed (or debriefed) jointly before any media source could say anything about this religious courtship of the U.S. govenment disguised as a Roman Catholic ritual...
A.
Post a Comment