Friday, May 10, 2013
Jan 10 2013 | Bruce Telfer |
Quotes of the Times: “And this is good old Boston. The home of bean and cod. Where the Lowells talk only to Cabots, And the Cabots talk only to God.” ‘The Boston Toast’ by John Collins Bossidy. “When we sold the Heathen nations rum and opium in roll, And the Missionaries went along to save their souls”. ‘The Old Clipper Days’ by Julian S. Cutler.
“A New England ancestry than which one more distinguished could hardly be named.” Rev.
E.S. Lines (bishop of diocese of Newark, and president of the Newark
Historical Society), referring to the ancestry of William Huntingdon
Russell.
In the attempt to take over and destroy America, the Jesuits have, for a
long time, had powerful allies within America. In order to understand
who these allies are and why they would work together with the Jesuits,
we need to go back to the establishment of the American colonies, which
were originally part of the British Empire.
When Princess Diana gave birth to two sons, for the British royal
family, it was said partially in jest, that she had done her duty and
produced “an heir and a spare.” All aristocratic families were/are
obsessed with the necessity of creating a male heir to carry on the
family name and preserving the family fortune. [Do you remember Henry
VIII and his six wives – all for the sake of producing that vital male
heir]. Since infant mortality was high in former times, as many
‘spares’ as possible were also welcome in case of the death of the
first-born.
However, it was always a problem to know what to do with all the
‘spares’ – the usual custom was for the younger sons to become officers
in the army or navy or alternatively to join the church as priests.
However, as the British Empire expanded several other attractive
alternatives became possible. For example, there was a growing demand
for colonial administrators - but the greatest opportunities were in the
area of trade and commerce. The ‘spares’ were provided with capital
and sent off into the world to seek their fortunes (and the fortunes of
their families) - the most popular destinations were India and America.
Great fortunes were made by these people, and the creation of great
family dynasties were nurtured and preserved by the accumulation of
wealth.
 |
[Red Coats Vs Americans at Stoney Creek 1812]
When the American colonies revolted against the Empire, the loyalty of
the ‘spares’ and their descendants, were firmly on the side of the
Empire - when the Empire lost the struggle, it is assumed that most of
these people all fled to Canada - but many also remained. One of the
areas that became a bastion for these pro-British Americans, was that
part of New England that constitutes the states of Connecticut and
Massachusetts in general, and in particular the city of Boston. Even
today Boston is well-known for its dynastical families such as the
Lowells and the Cabots (and many more). Locally, they are known as the
‘Boston Brahmins’ (after the highest class in the Hindu caste system –
they even have their own distinctive accent). Nationally, they are
known as the ‘Eastern Establishment’ and the ‘Untitled Aristocracy.’
Internationally, they are known as the ruling class in America. What is
not known (or rather what has been forgotten), is that these people
have never been republicans (i.e. they have never been supporters of the
American constitution or the American political system). Their first
loyalty is not to the Republic of the United States of America. Their
first loyalty is to their own families (including their aristocratic
connections in England). And their instincts are aristocratic, not
democratic – they despise everything to do with democratic forms of
government. Like all those who are aristocratically inclined they
believe they are ‘born to rule.’ These people make natural allies for
the Jesuits – they share the same philosophical outlook, they share the
same goals, and they share the same hatred for the Republic of the
United States of America. [Their treasonous inclinations were on
evidence during the war of 1812 (against Britain) when the ‘Essex Junto’
(named after a county in Massachusetts) advocated the succession of New
England from the Union, in favour of Britain. The ‘Essex Junto’ was
made up of the ‘untitled New England aristocracy’ – they were never
prosecuted for their treason].
If we examine just one of these ‘untitled New England’ families, we will
be able to understand the profound influence these pro-British (and
anti-American) families have had, and continue to have, over the entire
spectrum of American society. The family we will choose to study is the
Russell family. The family with, “a New England ancestry than which
one more distinguished could hardly be named.”
The Russells were originally ‘de Roussel’ from Normandy, in France. They won their aristocratic spurs when they crossed the English Channel with William
the Conquer in 1066. After the Norman Conquest, Hugue (Hugh) de
Roussel was appointed Marshall of England, (the office of Marshall was
to manage the horses and to protect the Monarch). This is the beginning
of the Russell aristocratic line – and if their New England ancestry
was distinguished, their close connection to the English crown was even
more distinguished.
In order to come down to modern times, we must jump several centuries to
1842, when we find Samuel Russell in possession of what Wikipedia calls
“the largest and most important American trading house in China…”
called Russell and Company. Samuel Russell was a drug smuggler. He
made his fortune by trading goods in Turkey for opium, and then trading
the opium into China for the much sort after China tea, silk and
porcelain. Samuel would have made even more money if he could have
bought his opium in India and then went to China. But unfortunately for
Samuel (and all the other American traders and drug smugglers) India
was a part of the British Empire and the British had a monopoly on
Indian opium and they were the main players, in the opium for Chinese
tea, silk and porcelain trade.
 |
[European factories at Canton]
It is worth digressing here to examine the China trade in more detail.
The wealth of the British Empire rested on its ability to transport the
trade of the world in British ships – legislation was passed in Britain
and around the Empire to insure a near monopoly on international trade.
[The wealth of the present American Empire is dependent on the same
arrangement – the only difference being that international trade is
‘carried’ by the American dollar].
The British system had several key hubs. The first hub was the cotton
producing southern states of America. Cotton was a key ingredient in
the industrial revolution. The cotton was shipped to England, where it
was made into textiles. The textiles were shipped all over the world,
but especially to India, which had a huge population and was hence a
huge market. [Before India became a part of the British Empire it had a
vibrant textile industry of its own, but the British destroyed it by
imposing high taxes and tariffs on the industry. The British then
encouraged the production of opium in India for smuggling/trading into
China].
The reason the British (and Americans) became drug dealers is because
there was a huge demand (worldwide) for Chinese products, but the
Chinese (having a long tradition of insularity and disdain for
foreigners), did not want anything to do with the ‘barbarian’ Europeans,
and they were not interested in importing British or American
industrial or manufactured goods. The Chinese were willing to trade for
gold and silver (and sometimes the Americans were willing to use gold
and silver), but the British were not willing to pay for Chinese
products with gold and silver and they forced the Chinese to take opium.
 |
[Chinese Opium Den]
When the Chinese became aware of the nefarious effects of opium
addiction they made the opium trade illegal. The British responded by
using their navy to bombard the coastal Chinese cities until the Chinese
relented. The Chinese tried a second time to ban opium and to free
themselves from the dominance of the drug dealers, but again the British
responded by destroying Chinese cities. Historically, these opium
fueled confrontations between China and Britain are called ‘The Opium
Wars’ (The First Opium War 1839-1842 – the Second 1856-1860). The
British Empire was, in large part, being funded by drug dealing. At
this point in history, opium was the single most traded commodity in
international trade – it occupied the position then, what oil occupies
now – just as we have oil wars now – they had opium wars then.
This imposed imperial ‘trading’ arrangement which was so lucrative,
naturally attracted competitors. The most successful competitors were
American ships sailing out of the cities of Boston and Salem, in the
state of Massachusetts. [These port cities have had a long history of
trading with China and it is known locally as ‘The Old China Trade’].
The first American trading ship arrived in China in 1784 (one year after
American independence). Samuel Russell arrived in Canton, China in
1819. Initially, he started trading on behalf of another company called
Edward Carrington & Company and again according to Wikipedia Samuel
traded in “various goods and products including opium, an extremely
profitable activity despite being outlawed-yet protected by foreign
forces.” Samuel Russell was a drug dealer – but so was everyone else –
and the armies and navies of various European nations (but especially
Britain) were there to ensure the trade in opium continued
uninterrupted.
 |
[The Nemisis destroying chinese war junks during the Second Battle of Chuenpee, 7 January 1841 ]
But Samuel did not do it all on his own, there were other ‘Boston
Brahmins’ in China as well (including the Cabots and the Lowells). John
Perkins Cushing was in China even before Samuel Russell, arriving there
in 1803. John Cushing’s mother was a Perkins (another Boston Brahmin
family), and John Cushing went to China to manage the Perkins Company
(which was already established there). This company (Perkins and
Company) later merged with the Samuel Russell run company, of Russell
and Company, making Russell and Company the dominant American Company in
China. [Thus we see that the Boston Brahmins are very much
inter-related both through business links and family ties – and because
of these intimate links, all of their fabulously fabled fortunes
originated with the opium drug trade].
Drug smuggling Samuel Russell had a cousin called William Huntington
Russell. William was an academic. He spent two years studying in
Germany (1831,32), attending various German universities (the home of
the Jesuit inspired Illuminati). Upon his return to America in 1832, he
immediately founded the secret society of ‘The Order of Skull and
Bones’ at Yale University. [Yale has been intimately entwined with the
Russell Family - Noadiah Russell being one of the founding trustees of
the university]. [The name of the University comes from one of its
greatest benefactors, Elihu Yale. Elihu worked for the East Indian
Company rising to the position of Governor of Madras. His fortune, some
of which he gave to Yale University, came from the opium drug trade].
[The legal entity that administers Skull and Bones and owns the
society’s assets is called The Russell Trust Association]. [Harvard
University, being that other elite school for ‘the untitled
aristocracy’, was also endowed with money from the opium drug trade].
 |
[Skull & Bones Secret Society]
The influence of Skull and Bones over American affairs can be
demonstrated by pointing out what was foisted on the American people
during the 2004 Presidential Elections – both candidates were from ‘the
untitled New England aristocracy’ and both of them were members of Skull
and Bones. [George W. Bush wrote in his autobiography: “In my senior
year I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society; so secret, I can’t say
anything more.” When both John Kerry and George Bush were asked by a TV
show host what it meant for the American people, that both presidential
candidates were members of Skull and Bones Kerry replied: “Not much
because it’s a secret”]. Meet the Press, August 31, 2003.
It surely is a ‘Sign of the Times’ that presidential candidates (and
other political candidates) can stand for elections in a
republican/democratic society (where everything is supposed to be
transparent and open), and yet they openly confess membership in a
secret shadowy world, that the voting public is not allowed to know
anything about. It should be obvious that membership in such an
exclusive and elitist secret society such as Skull and Bones does not
fall under the category of “not much” – when it comes to consequences
for the American people and the world at large. Republican and
democratic principles are meant to be about legitimate choice – in the
2004 election there was no genuine choice – if you voted for tweedledum
or tweedledee – you ended up with the same thing – Skull and Bones.
To be continued…
God bless, Bruce Telfer.
For further information go to: http://www.minormusings.com/Index.html
Extra Note:
The Russell penchant (and expertise) for creating secret societies is
evident in the creation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Charles Taze
Russell founded the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Watchtower (the
proprietary organisation than owns and administers the JW sect) in
1881. From the beginning of the movement there has been much
speculation about the origins of the JWs and especially whether C. T.
Russell was a freemason or not. The fact that C.T. Russell was buried
in the Rosemont United Cemetery (just outside Pittsburgh), with a
pyramid adjacent his headstone, and on the pyramid Masonic symbols –
perhaps this should be enough evidence to conclude, that he was involved
with occult secret societies. [The Watchtower publications often
feature occult symbolism – the purpose of which is to alert the ‘adepts’
or the ‘initiates’ (those high ranking secret society members) of the
true nature of the organisation].
Extra Note:
It would be naïve to believe that the ‘powers that be’ should abandon
something as lucrative as the drug trade. After all, it is not only
lucrative from a purely monetary point of view – but it can also be used
as a form of warfare by another means, as is demonstrated by what
happened to China. [The whole social fabric of China was weakened by
the opium drug trade – and deliberately so, because it enabled the
‘powers that be’ to control China]. That the ‘powers that be’ have not
relinquished control over the drug trade is evident with what has
recently happened with ‘The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation
(HSBC) - the largest of all the European Banks.
First some more history: the British involvement in India was
originally in the hands of a private company called the ‘East India
Company’ – this company was in India purely for profit. It was this
company that was behind the opium drug trade into China (it as this
company that was so powerful that they could call upon the British
Imperial war machine to back their plans and goals – such as the two
Opium Wars against China). It was during the first Opium War that
Britain annexed the island of Hong Kong and used it as a trading post
into China (still its role today). The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation (HSBC) was established in 1865 to facilitate trade between
China and England – which was of course largely trade in opium. Did the
HSBC ever cease to be involved in the drug trade – NO! [The same
tactics (the use of drugs) that were used to destabilize China are now
being used to destabilise America. The only difference is that the drug
of choice is no longer opium, but its more powerful derivative heroin,
along with cocaine and its derivatives. (Other countries are also
severely hurt in the process, such as Colombia and Mexico – but they are
just ‘collateral damage’ – the real target is America)].
The HSBC has recently been found guilty of ‘laundering’ the profits of
the illegal drug industry. After an extensive investigation by the
American Government, the bank has been fined $1.2 billion - but nobody
is going to jail. The latest development is that the bank and the
government have done a deal. The deal is called a ‘deferred prosecution
agreement’ (DPA). What this ‘agreement’ means is that not one of the
guilty executives at the bank will be prosecuted – no one will be held
accountable. The New York Times informs
us, that state and federal officials “decided against indicting HSBC in
a money-laundering case over concerns that criminal charges could
jeopardize one of the world’s largest banks and ultimately destabilize
the global financial system.” NYT Dec. 10, 2012. Which means that, the ‘too big to fail banks’ are also ‘too big to prosecute.’
But wait, the executives did get one punishment – they are going to have
their bonuses delayed! – not denied – just delayed]. [The shareholders
will be paying the fine – but they probably won’t mind, after all the
bank’s profits for the previous year were $22 billion]. However, other
commentators are not so generous with their assessment of the ‘slap on
the hand’ as The New York Times. Matt Taibbi, financial journalist at Rolling Stone wrote a representative piece expressing the outrage many feel (please excuse the colourful language, some of it is deleted):
“Wow. So the executives who spent a decade laundering billions of dollars will have to partially defer
their bonuses during the five-year deferred prosecution agreement? Are
you ******* kidding me? That’s the punishment? The government’s
negotiators couldn’t hold firm on forcing HSBC officials to completely wait
to receive their ill-gotten bonuses? They had to settle on making them
‘partially’ wait? Every honest prosecutor in America has to be puking
his guts out at such bargaining tactics. What was the Justice
Department’s opening offer–asking executives to restrict their Caribbean
vacation time to nine weeks a year?... What’s the appropriate penalty
for a bank in HSBC’s position? Exactly how much money should one
extract from a firm that has been shamelessly profiting from business
with criminals for years and years? Remember, we’re talking about a
company that has admitted to a smorgasbord of serious banking crimes.
If you’re the prosecutor, you’ve got this bank by the *****. So how
much money should you take? How about all of
it? How about every last dollar the bank has made since it started its
illegal activity? How about you dive into every bank account of every
single executive involved in this mess and take every last bonus dollar
they’ve ever earned? Then take their houses, their cars, the paintings
they bought at Sotheby’s auctions, the clothes in their closets, the
loose change in the jars on their kitchen counters, every last freaking
thing. Take it all and don’t think twice. And then throw them in jail.” Rolling Stone, Dec. 13, 2012.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment