A week has passed since Major Nidal Malik Hasan, an U.S. Army Psychiatrist killed 13 and wounded 3o, when he went on a rampage opening fire on his fellow soldiers on Fort Hood in Texas. The crazed Major was eventually shot and incapacitated by Dept. of Defense Police Officer Sgt. Kimberly Munley.
The moment that the perpetrator's religion was revealed, the apologies and excuses began to fly like migrating birds in the Spring. Immediately, the White House issued caution in jumping to conclusions; they argued that the shooting had nothing to do with N. M. Hasan being a Muslim. On native soil, on an Army installation 13 soldiers were killed and 30 others were wounded; Yet, this had nothing to do with Islam?
After the shootings occurred, and Hasan lay in Coma, all types of discoveries were made about his life. His personality was described as erratic, belligerent at times, and submissive at other times. He was said to have strong feelings about Islam and the war the U.S. was currently conducting in Muslim homelands. Reports began to pour in about Hasan's relationship with Imam Anwar Al Awlaki (who praised the shootings). Also, it was stated that Hasan attended a Mosque in Virginia, at the same time as two of the "911 hijackers". Then the most condemning information surfaced: Hasan was a sub-standard performer at Walter Reed Medical Center; His supervisors had transferred him to Ft. Hood hoping that he would 'disappear' in the crowd (Ft. Hood is the largest Armed Forces installation in the U.S.)
The speculation will continue until Nidal Malik Hasan is finally convicted for his crime. By the way, he will be tried by a military tribunal. However, the hypocrisy that surrounds this incident is flabbergasting. When a Muslim goes into a rage and kills American soldiers in a secured Army post; How can anyone doubt that this wasn't a terrorist attack? Why are the government authorities so swift to pacify the country with assurances that this has nothing to do with Terrorism? They swear this was just an isolated incident.
If it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck, and it quacks?
The moment that the perpetrator's religion was revealed, the apologies and excuses began to fly like migrating birds in the Spring. Immediately, the White House issued caution in jumping to conclusions; they argued that the shooting had nothing to do with N. M. Hasan being a Muslim. On native soil, on an Army installation 13 soldiers were killed and 30 others were wounded; Yet, this had nothing to do with Islam?
After the shootings occurred, and Hasan lay in Coma, all types of discoveries were made about his life. His personality was described as erratic, belligerent at times, and submissive at other times. He was said to have strong feelings about Islam and the war the U.S. was currently conducting in Muslim homelands. Reports began to pour in about Hasan's relationship with Imam Anwar Al Awlaki (who praised the shootings). Also, it was stated that Hasan attended a Mosque in Virginia, at the same time as two of the "911 hijackers". Then the most condemning information surfaced: Hasan was a sub-standard performer at Walter Reed Medical Center; His supervisors had transferred him to Ft. Hood hoping that he would 'disappear' in the crowd (Ft. Hood is the largest Armed Forces installation in the U.S.)
The speculation will continue until Nidal Malik Hasan is finally convicted for his crime. By the way, he will be tried by a military tribunal. However, the hypocrisy that surrounds this incident is flabbergasting. When a Muslim goes into a rage and kills American soldiers in a secured Army post; How can anyone doubt that this wasn't a terrorist attack? Why are the government authorities so swift to pacify the country with assurances that this has nothing to do with Terrorism? They swear this was just an isolated incident.
If it looks like a duck, and it walks like a duck, and it quacks?
When our (volunteers) troops are killed on native soil by fellow soldiers has got to be the ultimate breach of confidence. Where is there safety if not on an Army installation?
Here's the ultimate delusion; This morning I heard a disclaimer on NPR before they interviewed, yet, another Islamic impartial expert, a Muslim Chaplain: We need to remember that Hasan is innocent until proven guilty. Hasan has regained consciousness, and has asked for a lawyer; He refuses to cooperate with the investigators.
Political Correctness is a sickening ethic. When you apologize for all types of degenerate human acts, and beliefs; And, pretend an impartial mind set towards all kinds of practices, and condemn righteousness; Ridicule traditional decency, but, applaud decadence. How can you have 13 dead soldiers, 30 others injured for life, and say that we don't know if this a terrorist attack?
Who knows why Hasan snapped? Just like the modern trend we are defending the perpetrator and victimizing the victim. Does 13 dead soldiers killed by friendly fire register in you distorted political correct psyche? Stop the lopsided rationales. Twisted logic? No, backward intelligence.
Arsenio.
20Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
22Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:
23Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!
Here's the ultimate delusion; This morning I heard a disclaimer on NPR before they interviewed, yet, another Islamic impartial expert, a Muslim Chaplain: We need to remember that Hasan is innocent until proven guilty. Hasan has regained consciousness, and has asked for a lawyer; He refuses to cooperate with the investigators.
Political Correctness is a sickening ethic. When you apologize for all types of degenerate human acts, and beliefs; And, pretend an impartial mind set towards all kinds of practices, and condemn righteousness; Ridicule traditional decency, but, applaud decadence. How can you have 13 dead soldiers, 30 others injured for life, and say that we don't know if this a terrorist attack?
Who knows why Hasan snapped? Just like the modern trend we are defending the perpetrator and victimizing the victim. Does 13 dead soldiers killed by friendly fire register in you distorted political correct psyche? Stop the lopsided rationales. Twisted logic? No, backward intelligence.
Arsenio.
20Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
21Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!
22Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:
23Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!
Isaiah 5:20-23.
P.S. The author of this blog knows a little about serving in the Armed Forces. Received an honorable discharge from the U.S. Air Force on November 11, 1978.
.
