The question is not whether president Obama called the attack on the Consulate in Benghazi - Libya a Terrorist act? Where an Ambassador and 3 other Americans were killed; But, rather, why did the Obama White House blame the killings on a bogus video “The Innocence of Muslims”, that demeans Muhammad and Muslims? The administration categorized the fatal aggression an unfortunate, violent reaction to a hate crime against Muslims?
That is the real issue.
PANDERING and APOLOGIZING TO THE KILLERS?
Why did Obama, Hillary, and Susan Rice use the media and the U.N. to blame the bizarre video clip for the assassination of an American diplomat and 3 others in a supposed non-enemy state? When it was actually a organized guerilla assault? It was not civil unrest or a riot? It was an attack!
During the second Presidential Debate on October 16, 2012, Mitt Romney failed to point out the ruse that really makes this fiasco stand out. The fact is that 4 people were killed in an American consulate and the White House blamed it on a video. That is the point that candidate Romney was not able to verbalize.
Romney was on to something (about the Benghazi killings) last Wednesday night when president Obama and Candy Crowley were successful in stifling his speech; However, with the latest findings this developing story is going to spiral and go viral. Watch out when the floodgates are opened; I see a flood the size of Watergate coming upon the scene.
A.L.
Barack Obama condemns 'slander' of the 'prophet' Muhammad at UN
Hillary Clinton calls anti-Muslim film, Innocence of Muslims 'disgusting and reprehensible'
Ambassador Rice: Anti-Islam Film Responsible For Attacks, Not Administration's Policy
.
No comments:
Post a Comment