Sunday, August 30, 2009

Homeless in Washington Sign Book in Kennedy’s Memory

Late Senator Championed Eradication of Homelessness

Dorothy Rowley


AFRO Staff Writer



Rocky Twyman coordinated the Washington, DC, soup kitchen tribute to the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy. From left: Lord Waters, Twyman, and Marcia Foster. (Photo by Dorothy Rowley)



(August 29, 2009) - The passing of Sen. Edward Kennedy, who was laid to rest this weekend at Arlington National Cemetery, has left a void in the lives of many in the country’s minority communities.

Among them were roughly 50 people who gathered Thursday during lunch hour District of Columbia soup kitchen where they paid homage to Kennedy, remembering his efforts to help the homeless by signing a makeshift notebook in memory of the iconic Democrat who died on Tuesday.

The book signing took place at First Seventh Day Adventist Church in northwest Washington. It was coordinated by Rocky Twyman, 60, of Rockville, Md., who said Kennedy’s unwavering efforts to end homelessness were unmatched.

“He did so much to help the poorest of the poor. He was a champion of their rights,” said Twyman. “I always admired Sen. Kennedy because he did so much for the cause of Black folks. He really supported us. ”

Tywman added that Kennedy was “a hero for Black people,” and that had it not been for his support, “Obama would not be in the White House.”

Kennedy once told the Massachusetts Coalition for the Homeless in a speech that a slate of issues contributed to poverty and, ultimately, homelessness.

“Each homeless person has their own story, with unique circumstances, but together, they teach us the same lesson,” Kennedy said. “We must deal more effectively with the problems that contribute to homelessness, such as drug abuse, poverty, domestic violence, mental illness and the lack of basic skills and adequate education.”

District resident Randolph Squire, 58, who frequents the soup kitchen, said Kennedy was simply a good man.

“He went out of his way to help the homeless,” Squire said. “No one can ever say that he didn’t fight for us.”

Tywman said Kennedy’s demise will have a significant impact on the soup kitchen because most of its clients are without health insurance. He said that with Kennedy’s passing, Obama now faces an uphill battle on health care reform.

“Kennedy was the one legislator who could shepherd those bills through Congress and now it will be very difficult for Obama without him,” Twyman said.



Source: http://www.afro.com/tabId/551/itemId/4511/Homeless-in-Washington-Sign-Book-in-Kennedys-Memo.aspx
.

ANCHOR BABIES: THE EDUCATIONAL CHAOS


ANCHOR BABIES: THE EDUCATIONAL CHAOS


PART 4


By Frosty Wooldridge


August 27, 2009


NewsWithViews.com



In this final entry of this series on Anchor Babies in America, we shall investigate the unbelievable but verifiable costs to American citizens. Additionally, we will explore ancillary problems created by illegal alien children within our classrooms across the country.
Do we blame the children? No! Do we blame their parents? No!



Who do we blame? Simple! Our U.S. Congress and U.S. presidents from Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43 and today, Obama! They must take responsibility for this fiscal/educational and linguistic fiasco. They failed to enforce our laws in the past 20 years, and Obama fails to enforce our immigration and labor laws in 2009. Thus, they allowed countless tens of thousands of employers within the United States to subvert our laws as to employment of unlawful immigrants. Our Congress allowed a new 21st century slave class to establish itself in excess of 20 million unlawful aliens—inside this country. The rich benefit and the rest of us subsidize and suffer from it.



While those 20 million enjoy employment, housing, welfare, food and medical care on U.S. taxpayer dollars, 15 million Americans cannot find a job. An astounding 32.2 million Americans subsist on food stamps. Our working poor and minorities languish in the streets and 13 million American children live below the poverty level.



EDUCATIONAL CHAOS
Those 400,000 anchor babies cost taxpayers big time! At $6,000.00 per delivery in our hospitals where those pregnant alien mothers take themselves to birth their children X’s 400,000 annually: $2.4 billion annually. Year after year after year! If the child suffers from autism, Down’s Syndrome, myocardial septal defect (hole in heart), deformity, premature birth in ICU or other problems—the costs may hit $1 million and more.



Remember also, that the mother becomes a ward of the welfare rolls in assisted housing, food stamps, medical care, welfare payments—all on the taxpayer’s dollar. Instead of 400,000 dependents, the actual number doubles to 900,000. Additionally, as that mother births more children, the costs rise dramatically.



Once the child reaches age five, it begins a 13 year educational journey that costs taxpayers on average $9,644.00 annually depending on school districts within the United States. When you add in ‘free’ breakfasts and lunches for those disadvantaged children, the costs rise into the billions of dollars. Finally, English as a Second Language costs taxpayers according to economist Edwin Rubenstein:


“The total additional per pupil costs for language assistance instruction was estimated to be in the range of $200 to $700 in 1981 dollars—equivalent to $460 to $1,600 in 2007 dollars. Using the average of the latter two amounts—$1,030—as our estimate of per pupil cost, the total cost of providing English Language Learning instruction to the 3.8 million students enrolled in those programs would equal about $3.9 billion. ($1,030 × 3.8 million.).”


(Source: http://www.thesocialcontract.com/, Department of Education - Immigration Fiscal Impact Statement, By Edwin S. Rubenstein Volume 18, Number 2 (Winter 2007-2008) Issue theme: "What price mass immigration?")



With those figures of 3.8 million illegal immigrant children and children born as anchor babies X’s a minimum figure of $5.00 for ‘free’ breakfasts and lunches X’s 180 school days equals: $5.42 billion annually.



Talk about throwing U.S. taxpayer dollars down a rat hole, NBC’s Brian Williams reported last June that high school graduation rates around the country suffered tremendously. Detroit public schools, loaded with Middle Eastern legal and illegal immigrants along with unlawful Mexican migrant children tallied an astounding 76 percent dropout/flunkout rate among potential graduating seniors. Other cities like L.A., Chicago and Houston hovered around 50 to 60 percent dropout rates.



Brian Williams reported that 1.2 million ‘American’ teens hit the streets annually “functionally illiterate.”



In my city of Denver, 67 percent of the graduating class dropped out or flunked out before age eighteen. (Source: Rocky Mountain News, “What Happened?”)



Dan Stein at http://www.fairus.org/ published a report titled: “Breaking the Piggy Bank: How Illegal Immigration is Sending Schools into the Red”. Estimated costs of educating illegal migrant children and anchor babies: $7.5 billion annually.



The report said, in California, the $2.2 billion spent educating illegal alien immigrants for one year could:



• Pay the salaries for 41,764 teachers.• CA schools are threatened with a $1.5 billion cut next year. Eliminating illegals would pay for all needs.• Pay for CA’s class sizes to remain capped at 20 students for a year, with $300 million to spare. • Buy books and computers to equip 346,689 classrooms or 79 percent of classrooms in California.• Fully fund the state’s free lunch program for poor American students for two years.



Instead, California dropped from the top five top school systems in the United States to the bottom five states. Teaches struggle teaching with 113 different languages in their classrooms. As a teacher, I can tell you that more than one language in a classroom causes educational tension, ethnic tension from lack of ability to communicate and racial separation.


Students become angry, stubborn and overwhelmed as they ‘drop out’ from sheer frustration and inability to perform academically. Violence ensues or complete withdrawal! Thousands join gangs for their identity.



Finally, what about U.S. children? What about the quality of their educations? What about their well-being? What about our own poverty-stricken students and special needs across the country?



Today, one-third of all students graduating from high schools heavily impacted by mass immigration must take remedial courses in universities to bring their minds up to speed for college work. In thousands of schools, gangs, foreign languages and strange customs usurp the educational experience for U.S. students.



At some point, and soon, we must stop ‘birthright citizenship’ as all other countries, including Ireland and New Zealand, have done.



This year, House member Nathan Deal introduced HR 1868: reintroduced his Birthright Citizenship bill that would eliminate automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to illegal aliens. The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2009 (H.R.1868) would amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to make it more difficult for children born in the U.S. to gain citizenship.



Under the proposed legislation, a person born in the United States, in order to gain citizenship, must have at least one parent who is:

a U.S. citizen or national; a lawful permanent resident alien whose residence is in the United States; or an alien performing active service in the U.S. Armed Forces. Thank you for joining http://www.numbersusa.com/ and http://www.capsweb.org/ and http://www.fairus.org/ to send in pre-written faxes that will push the entire Congress to pass this important bill. Otherwise, you will keep paying and paying billions and billions—year after year with no end in sight.

Additionally, when those kids reach 18, they can chain migrate their entire families into the USA—causing a horrific overload of our infrastructure, carrying capacity and quality of life. Not to mention we are displacing Americans out of their own culture, language and way of life!



Part 5: Fomenting failure in our educational systems



Listen to Frosty Wooldridge on Wednesdays as he interviews top national leaders on his radio show "Connecting the Dots" at http://www.themicroeffect.com/ at 6:00 PM Mountain Time. Adjust tuning in to your time zone.



© 2009 Frosty Wooldridge - All Rights Reserved



Source: http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty495.htm


.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

WAS TORNADO GOD'S REBUKE?


By Jon Christian Ryter
August 27, 2009
NewsWithViews.com

In its online edition, Christianity Today poised the question, pondering whether or not there was any connection between the vote by the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America [ELCA} to adopt a "sexuality statement" on homosexuality and the tornado which struck the Minneapolis Convention Center on Aug. 19 where they were meeting. John Piper, whose Baptist Church is just down the road from the convention center thought the storm itself was the message, telling Christianity Today reporter Ted Olsen that "...[t]he tornado in Minneapolis was a gentle but firm warning to the ELCA and to all of us: Turn from the approval of sin. Turn from the promotion of behaviors that lead to destruction."

A Christian renewal group within the ELCA reported that both sides of the discussion claimed the weather was a commentary from God supporting their point of view. WordAlone issued a statement in which they said "...a supporter of the social statement..." (those attempting to sanctify homosexuality in the Lutheran Church as normal behavior "...typified the storm as a mighty wind of the Holy Spirit, and as a positive message. Some WordAlone members heard a different message—a warning of God's anger at the ELCA in the wind." The tornado did significant roof damage to the Convention Center with 2,200 registered members debating the question of whether or not the Lutherans should approve a statement mitigating homosexuality inside. Outside the Central Lutheran Church, next door to the Convention Center, strong winds tore off part of the church's 90-year old metal steeple, then ripped apart large outdoor tents, and scattered chairs and folding tables across the parking lot. The tents were used earlier that day to serve breakfast to the guests attending the convention. Church member Jack Freitag said he saw a "..wall cloud from the south coming across the parking lot (with a) very loud roar." He saw signs and debris being blown around in the wind. "I was worried about the people then..."

About 120 people had taken refuge in the church's basement. The funnel cloud, which touched down twice, made significant physical impact on the terrain without doing any serious damage. A witness at the church said: "We saw the tornado. It was turning real fast. It got real black out here and had the trees coming to us on the left. The windows were shaking real bad, and all this stuff across the street in the church, they had a little dinner there, it tore it all up, and it was just lifting off the ground. And, it just disappeared. It just disappeared." Myself, if I had been one of the delegates voting, I would have voted against softening the position on homosexuality.

Nevertheless, with 2,200 registered attendees of which half were voters, by a vote of 676 to 338—the exact number needed to win—the delegates voted for a more open position on homosexuality (without officially sanctifying homosexuality as normal relationship). Their position became one of neither condemning nor condoning. The statement suggests the delegates could not reach a consensus although, in reality, they did. They agreed that in "...this discernment about ethics and church practices, faithful people can and will come to different conclusions about the meaning of Scripture and about constitutes responsible action. We further believe that this church, on the basis of 'sound conscience' will include these different understandings and practices within its life as it seeks to live out its mission and ministry in the world."

The fly in the ointment was found in the footnotes. The church statement clearly reveals what the church membership should view as a Laodicean red flag and find a Bible-believing church in which to fellowship with God. In the footnotes, this statement appears: "When the question is about morality or church practice, the Pauline and Lutheran witness is less adamant and believes we may be called to respect the bound conscience of the neighbor. That is, if salvation is not at stake in a particular question..." Since homosexuality is a violation of God's commandments (even in the Muslim faith), it cannot be casually overlooked and made acceptable to God when it is not.

The footnote continues that "...if a brother or sister...saw eating meat (offered to pagan idols as something inherently wrong), the Christian was obligated to "walk in love" by eating just vegetables for the neighbor's sake." In point of fact, what is corrupting Christianity is the practice of compromising the Word of God in an attempt to find common ground where Christianity can be merged with other religions of the world. Just as the cold water springs and hot springs that run under the ancient city of Laodicea merge, becoming neither hot nor cold, so are the hearts of today's social Christians who find social compromise works better than standing on unpopular Christian principles.

I believe the Minneapolis tornado, in this context, did allegorically represent God's anger and His disappointment in the elders of that body. And the torrential rains were His tears over the wrong decision made by His "freewill creation" as He watched with a freshly crucified heart as members of the Body of Faith divorced themselves from His Word and became part of the rapidly growing Church of Laodicea that sees no evil in evil. The ELCA mollified His commandments and bent them to the whims of man, who is now promoting the lukewarm societal church that offends no one—except God.

© 2009 Jon C. Ryter - All Rights Reserved

[Order, Jon C. Ryter's book, "Whatever Happened to America?" It's out of print, and supply is limited.]
.
.

Maybe on Sunday - James Arrabito

James Arrabito

Maybe on Sunday (you have to see this!) incredible!

- 2:08:36 -

Jan 23, 2009

The Church in the Wilderness







James Arrabito

Jim Joe Maniscalco

Historic and biblical prophecy.

Daniel 11 and the Pioneer views of William miller's Prophetic Charts.

1844 and the cleansing of the heavenly Sanctuary and the three 3 angels messages of revelation 14. Bible study sermons on the daily and the antichrist 666 devil satan dragon good evil and mark of the beast of Rome.

Protestant and papal reformation from the pope.

Protestantism and America and Babylon the mother of harlots whore.

Christian Christianity church apostasy and salvation through Jesus Christ the seventh day Adventist church SDA Ellen White E G Gould Harmon King James Version Only.


North south Sodom Egypt battle Armageddon Megiddo millennium second coming economic crisis new world order Jesuits Jesuit catholic priest pastor minister bishop cardinal Joseph Mary miracle glorious land holy mountain new Jerusalem Mohamed Jehovah Abraham Jew Jewish Jews judgment white throne candle stick show bread ark of the covenant manna Moses Martin Luther Wycliffe Hus Tyndale Waldenses perdition man of sin four horseman 2 7 13 144,000 last plagues hell fire death resurrection famine pestilence blood martyrs cross crucified crucifixion chip implant bar code Sabbath Sunday seal forehead hand lion leopard bear 7 heads 10 horns jeff Pippenger dave westbrook«


Without a Wedding Garment


Page 307


Without a Wedding Garment
[This chapter is based on Matt. 22:1-14.]




The parable of the wedding garment opens before us a lesson of the highest consequence. By the marriage is represented the union of humanity with divinity; the wedding garment represents the character which all must possess who shall be accounted fit guests for the wedding.

In this parable, as in that of the great supper, are illustrated the gospel invitation, its rejection by the Jewish people, and the call of mercy to the Gentiles. But on the part of those who reject the invitation, this parable brings to view a deeper insult and a more dreadful punishment. The call to the feast is a king's invitation. It proceeds from one who is vested with power to command. It confers high honor. Yet the honor is unappreciated. The king's authority is despised. While the householder's invitation was regarded with indifference, the king's is met with insult and murder. They treated his servants with scorn, despitefully using them and slaying them.

The householder, on seeing his invitation slighted, declared that none of the men who are bidden should taste of his supper. But for those who had done despite

Page 308
to the king, more than exclusion from his presence and his table is decreed. "He sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city."
In both parables the feast is provided with guests, but the second shows that there is a preparation to be made by all who attend the feast. Those who neglect this preparation are cast out. "The king came in to see the guests," and "saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment; and he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

The call to the feast had been given by Christ's disciples. Our Lord had sent out the twelve and afterward the seventy, proclaiming that the kingdom of God was at hand, and calling upon men to repent and believe the gospel. But the call was not heeded. Those who are bidden to the feast did not come. The servants were sent out later to say, "Behold, I have prepared my dinner; my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage." This was the message borne to the Jewish nation after the crucifixion of Christ; but the nation that claimed to be God's peculiar people rejected the gospel brought to them in the power of the Holy Spirit. Many did this in the most scornful manner. Others were so exasperated by the offer of salvation, the offer of pardon for rejecting the Lord of glory, that they turned upon the bearers of the message. There was "a great persecution." Acts 8:1. Many both of men and women were thrust into prison, and some of the Lord's messengers, as Stephen and James, were put to death.

Thus the Jewish people sealed their rejection of God's

Page 309
mercy. The result was foretold by Christ in the parable. The king "sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city." The judgment pronounced came upon the Jews in the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the nation.
The third call to the feast represents the giving of the gospel to the Gentiles. The king said, "The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage."

The king's servants who went out into the highways "gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good." It was a mixed company. Some of them had no more real regard for the giver of the feast than had the ones who rejected the call. The class first bidden could not afford, they thought, to sacrifice any worldly advantage for the sake of attending the king's banquet. And of those who accepted the invitation, there were some who thought only of benefiting themselves. They came to share the provisions of the feast, but had no desire to honor the king.

When the king came in to view the guests, the real character of all was revealed. For every guest at the feast there had been provided a wedding garment. This garment was a gift from the king. By wearing it the guests showed their respect for the giver of the feast. But one man was clothed in his common citizen dress. He had refused to make the preparation required by the king. The garment provided for him at great cost he disdained to wear. Thus he insulted his lord. To the king's demand, "How camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment?" he could answer nothing. He was self-condemned. Then the king said, "Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness."

Page 310
By the king's examination of the guests at the feast is represented a work of judgment. The guests at the gospel feast are those who profess to serve God, those whose names are written in the book of life. But not all who profess to be Christians are true disciples. Before the final reward is given, it must be decided who are fitted to share the inheritance of the righteous. This decision must be made prior to the second coming of Christ in the clouds of heaven; for when He comes, His reward is with Him, "to give every man according as his work shall be." Rev. 22:12. Before His coming, then, the character of every man's work will have been determined, and to every one of Christ's followers the reward will have been apportioned according to his deeds.

It is while men are still dwelling upon the earth that the work of investigative judgment takes place in the courts of heaven. The lives of all His professed followers pass in review before God. All are examined according to the record of the books of heaven, and according to his deeds the destiny of each is forever fixed.

By the wedding garment in the parable is represented the pure, spotless character which Christ's true followers will possess. To the church it is given "that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white," "not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing." Eph. 5:27. The fine linen, says the Scripture, "is the righteousness of saints." Rev. 19:8. It is the righteousness of Christ, His own unblemished character, that through faith is imparted to all who receive Him as their personal Saviour.

The white robe of innocence was worn by our first parents when they were placed by God in holy Eden. They lived in perfect conformity to the will of God. All the strength of their affections was given to their heavenly Father. A beautiful soft light, the light of God, enshrouded

Page 311
the holy pair. This robe of light was a symbol of their spiritual garments of heavenly innocence. Had they remained true to God it would ever have continued to enshroud them. But when sin entered, they severed their connection with God, and the light that had encircled them departed. Naked and ashamed, they tried to supply the place of the heavenly garments by sewing together fig leaves for a covering.
This is what the transgressors of God's law have done ever since the day of Adam and Eve's disobedience. They have sewed together fig leaves to cover the nakedness caused by transgression. They have worn the garments of their own devising, by works of their own they have tried to cover their sins, and make themselves acceptable with God.

But this they can never do. Nothing can man devise to supply the place of his lost robe of innocence. No fig-leaf garment, no worldly citizen dress, can be worn by those who sit down with Christ and angels at the marriage supper of the Lamb.

Only the covering which Christ Himself has provided can make us meet to appear in God's presence. This covering, the robe of His own righteousness, Christ will put upon every repenting, believing soul. "I counsel thee," He says, "to buy of Me . . . white raiment, that thou mayest be clothed, and that the shame of thy nakedness do not appear." Rev. 3:18.

This robe, woven in the loom of heaven, has in it not one thread of human devising. Christ in His humanity wrought out a perfect character, and this character He offers to impart to us. "All our righteousness are as filthy rags." Isa. 64:6. Everything that we of ourselves can do is defiled by sin. But the Son of God "was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin." Sin is defined to be "the transgression of the law." 1 John 3:5, 4. But

Page 312
Christ was obedient to every requirement of the law. He said of Himself, "I delight to do Thy will, O My God; yea, Thy law is within My heart." Ps. 40:8. When on earth, He said to His disciples, "I have kept My Father's commandments." John 15:10. By His perfect obedience He has made it possible for every human being to obey God's commandments. When we submit ourselves to Christ, the heart is united with His heart, the will is merged in His will, the mind becomes one with His mind, the thoughts are brought into captivity to Him; we live His life. This is what it means to be clothed with the garment of His righteousness. Then as the Lord looks upon us He sees, not the fig-leaf garment, not the nakedness and deformity of sin, but His own robe of righteousness, which is perfect obedience to the law of Jehovah.
The guests at the marriage feast were inspected by the king. Only those were accepted who had obeyed his requirements and put on the wedding garment. So it is with the guests at the gospel feast. All must pass the scrutiny of the great King, and only those are received who have put on the robe of Christ's righteousness.

Righteousness is right doing, and it is by their deeds that all will be judged. Our characters are revealed by what we do. The works show whether the faith is genuine.

It is not enough for us to believe that Jesus is not an impostor, and that the religion of the Bible is no cunningly devised fable. We may believe that the name of Jesus is the only name under heaven whereby man may be saved, and yet we may not through faith make Him our personal Saviour. It is not enough to believe the theory of truth. It is not enough to make a profession of faith in Christ and have our names registered on the church roll. "He that keepeth His commandments dwelleth in Him, and He in him. And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by

Page 313
the Spirit which He hath given us." "Hereby we do know that we know Him if we keep His commandments." 1 John 3:24; 2:3. This is the genuine evidence of conversion. Whatever our profession, it amounts to nothing unless Christ is revealed in works of righteousness.
Page 314
The truth is to be planted in the heart. It is to control the mind and regulate the affections. The whole character must be stamped with the divine utterances. Every jot and tittle of the word of God is to be brought into the daily practice.

He who becomes a partaker of the divine nature will be in harmony with God's great standard of righteousness, His holy law. This is the rule by which God measures the actions of men. This will be the test of character in the judgment.

There are many who claim that by the death of Christ the law was abrogated; but in this they contradict Christ's own words, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets. . . . Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law." Matt. 5:17, 18. It was to atone for man's transgression of the law that Christ laid down His life. Could the law have been changed or set aside, then Christ need not have died. By His life on earth He honored the law of God. By His death He established it. He gave His life as a sacrifice, not to destroy God's law, not to create a lower standard, but that justice might be maintained, that the law might be shown to be immutable, that it might stand fast forever.

Satan had claimed that it was impossible for man to obey God's commandments; and in our own strength it is true that we cannot obey them. But Christ came in the form of humanity, and by His perfect obedience He proved that humanity and divinity combined can obey every one of God's precepts.

"As many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name." John 1:12. This power is not in the human agent. It is the power of God. When a soul receives Christ, he receives power to live the life of Christ.

Page 315
God requires perfection of His children. His law is a transcript of His own character, and it is the standard of all character. This infinite standard is presented to all that there may be no mistake in regard to the kind of people whom God will have to compose His kingdom. The life of Christ on earth was a perfect expression of God's law, and when those who claim to be children of God become Christlike in character, they will be obedient to God's commandments. Then the Lord can trust them to be of the number who shall compose the family of heaven. Clothed in the glorious apparel of Christ's righteousness, they have a place at the King's feast. They have a right to join the blood-washed throng.

The man who came to the feast without a wedding garment represents the condition of many in our world today. They profess to be Christians, and lay claim to the blessings and privileges of the gospel; yet they feel no need of a transformation of character. They have never felt true repentance for sin. They do not realize their need of Christ or exercise faith in Him. They have not overcome their hereditary or cultivated tendencies to wrongdoing. Yet they think that they are good enough in themselves, and they rest upon their own merits instead of trusting in Christ. Hearers of the word, they come to the banquet, but they have not put on the robe of Christ's righteousness.

Many who call themselves Christians are mere human moralists. They have refused the gift which alone could enable them to honor Christ by representing Him to the world. The work of the Holy Spirit is to them a strange work. They are not doers of the world. The heavenly principles that distinguish those who are one with Christ from those who are one with the world have become almost indistinguishable. The professed followers of Christ are

Page 316
no longer a separate and peculiar people. The line of demarcation is indistinct. The people are subordinating themselves to the world, to its practices, its customs, its selfishness. The church has gone over to the world in transgression of the law, when the world should have come over to the church in obedience to the law. Daily the church is being converted to the world.
All these expect to be saved by Christ's death, while they refuse to live His self-sacrificing life. They extol the riches of free grace, and attempt to cover themselves with an appearance of righteousness, hoping to screen their defects of character; but their efforts will be of no avail in the day of God.

The righteousness of Christ will not cover one cherished sin. A man may be a law-breaker in heart; yet if he commits no outward act of transgression, he may be regarded by the world as possessing great integrity. But God's law looks into the secrets of the heart. Every act is judged by the motives that prompt it. Only that which is in accord with the principles of God's law will stand in the judgment.

God is love. He has shown that love in the gift of Christ. When "He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life," He withheld nothing from His purchased possession. (John 3:16.) He gave all heaven, from which we may draw strength and efficiency, that we be not repulsed or overcome by our great adversary. But the love of God does not lead Him to excuse sin. He did not excuse it in Satan; He did not excuse it in Adam or in Cain; nor will He excuse it in any other of the children of men. He will not connive at our sins or overlook our defects of character. He expects us to overcome in His name.

Those who reject the gift of Christ's righteousness are

Page 317
rejecting the attributes of character which would constitute them the sons and daughters of God. They are rejecting that which alone could give them a fitness for a place at the marriage feast.
In the parable, when the king inquired, "How camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment?" the man was speechless. So it will be in the great judgment day. Men may now excuse their defects of character, but in that day they will offer no excuse.

The professed churches of Christ in this generation are exalted to the highest privileges. The Lord has been revealed to us in ever-increasing light. Our privileges are far greater than were the privileges of God's ancient people. We have not only the great light committed to Israel, but we have the increased evidence of the great salvation brought to us through Christ. That which was type and symbol to the Jews is reality to us. They had the Old Testament history; we have that and the New Testament also. We have the assurance of a Saviour who has come, a Saviour who has been crucified, who has risen, and over the rent sepulcher of Joseph has proclaimed, "I am the resurrection and the life." In our knowledge of Christ and His love the kingdom of God is placed in the midst of us. Christ is revealed to us in sermons and chanted to us in songs. The spiritual banquet is set before us in rich abundance. The wedding garment, provided at infinite cost, is freely offered to every soul. By the messengers of God are presented to us the righteousness of Christ, justification by faith, the exceeding great and precious promises of God's word, free access to the Father by Christ, the comfort of the Spirit, the well-grounded assurance of eternal life in the kingdom of God. What could God do for us that He has not done in providing the great supper, the heavenly banquet?

Page 318
In heaven it is said by the ministering angels: The ministry which we have been commissioned to perform we have done. We pressed back the army of evil angels. We sent brightness and light into the souls of men, quickening their memory of the love of God expressed in Jesus. We attracted their eyes to the cross of Christ. Their hearts were deeply moved by a sense of the sin that crucified the Son of God. They were convicted. They saw the steps to be taken in conversion; they felt the power of the gospel; their hearts were made tender as they saw the sweetness of the love of God. They beheld the beauty of the character of Christ. But with the many it was all in vain. They would not surrender their own habits and character. They would not put off the garments of earth in order to be clothed with the robe of heaven. Their hearts were given to covetousness. They loved the associations of the world more than they loved their God.

Solemn will be the day of final decision. In prophetic vision the apostle John describes it: "I saw a great white throne, and Him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them. And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works." Rev. 20:11, 12.

Sad will be the retrospect in that day when men stand face to face with eternity. The whole life will present itself just as it has been. The world's pleasures, riches, and honors will not then seem so important. Men will then see that the righteousness they despised is alone of value. They will see that they have fashioned their characters under the deceptive allurements of Satan. The garments they have chosen are the badge of their allegiance to the first great

Page 319
apostate. Then they will see the results of their choice. They will have a knowledge of what it means to transgress the commandments of God.
There will be no future probation in which to prepare for eternity. It is in this life that we are to put on the robe of Christ's righteousness. This is our only opportunity to form characters for the home which Christ has made ready for those who obey His commandments.

The days of our probation are fast closing. The end is near. To us the warning is given, "Take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares." Luke 21:34. Beware lest it find you unready. Take heed lest you be found at the King's feast without a wedding garment.

"In such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh." "Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame." Matt. 24:44; Rev. 16:15.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Christ's Object Lessons, E. G. W. , pp.307-319.

.

..

Our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government


When Protestantism shall stretch her hand across the gulf to grasp the hand of the Roman power, when she shall reach over the abyss to clasp hands with spiritualism, when, under the influence of this threefold union, our country shall repudiate every principle of its Constitution as a Protestant and republican government and shall make provision for the propagation of papal falsehoods and delusions, then we may know that the time has come for the marvelous working of Satan and that the end is near.--5T 451 (1885).
.

Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil...


Isaiah 5


1Now will I sing to my wellbeloved a song of my beloved touching his vineyard. My wellbeloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill:

2And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes.

3And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem, and men of Judah, judge, I pray you, betwixt me and my vineyard.

4What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes?

5And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down:

6And I will lay it waste: it shall not be pruned, nor digged; but there shall come up briers and thorns: I will also command the clouds that they rain no rain upon it.

7For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts is the house of Israel, and the men of Judah his pleasant plant: and he looked for judgment, but behold oppression; for righteousness, but behold a cry.

8Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place, that they may be placed alone in the midst of the earth!

9In mine ears said the LORD of hosts, Of a truth many houses shall be desolate, even great and fair, without inhabitant.

10Yea, ten acres of vineyard shall yield one bath, and the seed of an homer shall yield an ephah.

11Woe unto them that rise up early in the morning, that they may follow strong drink; that continue until night, till wine inflame them!

12And the harp, and the viol, the tabret, and pipe, and wine, are in their feasts: but they regard not the work of the LORD, neither consider the operation of his hands.

13Therefore my people are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge: and their honourable men are famished, and their multitude dried up with thirst.

14Therefore hell hath enlarged herself, and opened her mouth without measure: and their glory, and their multitude, and their pomp, and he that rejoiceth, shall descend into it.

15And the mean man shall be brought down, and the mighty man shall be humbled, and the eyes of the lofty shall be humbled:

16But the LORD of hosts shall be exalted in judgment, and God that is holy shall be sanctified in righteousness.

17Then shall the lambs feed after their manner, and the waste places of the fat ones shall strangers eat.

18Woe unto them that draw iniquity with cords of vanity, and sin as it were with a cart rope:

19That say, Let him make speed, and hasten his work, that we may see it: and let the counsel of the Holy One of Israel draw nigh and come, that we may know it!

20Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!

21Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!

22Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink:

23Which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him!

24Therefore as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their root shall be as rottenness, and their blossom shall go up as dust: because they have cast away the law of the LORD of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.

25Therefore is the anger of the LORD kindled against his people, and he hath stretched forth his hand against them, and hath smitten them: and the hills did tremble, and their carcases were torn in the midst of the streets. For all this his anger is not turned away, but his hand is stretched out still.

26And he will lift up an ensign to the nations from far, and will hiss unto them from the end of the earth: and, behold, they shall come with speed swiftly:

27None shall be weary nor stumble among them; none shall slumber nor sleep; neither shall the girdle of their loins be loosed, nor the latchet of their shoes be broken:

28Whose arrows are sharp, and all their bows bent, their horses' hoofs shall be counted like flint, and their wheels like a whirlwind:

29Their roaring shall be like a lion, they shall roar like young lions: yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the prey, and shall carry it away safe, and none shall deliver it.

30And in that day they shall roar against them like the roaring of the sea: and if one look unto the land, behold darkness and sorrow, and the light is darkened in the heavens thereof.



.

Spike Lee Celebrates Michael Jackson's Birthday


August 29, 2009

Saturday would have been Michael Jackson's 51st birthday. After weeks spent mourning the loss of the King of Pop, it's time to celebrate his life. If you're in New York, you should head to Prospect Park where filmmaker Spike Lee is throwing his childhood idol a birthday party — Brooklyn style. Host Scott Simon talks with the filmmaker about his birthday bash for the pop star.


Audio for this story from Weekend Edition Saturday will be available at approx. 12:00 p.m. ET

.



Podcast of this interview can be heard at link above after 12 P.M.
.

Friday, August 28, 2009

Faceoff! Cops versus preachers on public sidewalk

FAITH UNDER FIRE
Faceoff! Cops versus preachers on public sidewalk
Christians arrested 7 times for signs declaring homosexuality a sin

Posted: August 27, 200912:15 am Eastern
By Chelsea Schilling© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A street preacher is accusing police of violating his constitutional rights after officers arrested him for not having a parade permit while he spoke out against homosexuality on a public sidewalk in Manchester, Ga.

Chris Pettigrew and Pastor Billy Ball and of Faith Baptist Church in Primrose, Ga., were arrested multiple times Aug 24 after they held signs on a public street corner telling people to repent and declaring homosexuality a sin.


Street preachers hold signs condemning homosexulaity on public sidewalk (photo: Chris Pettigrew)








They held signs that stated:
Repent ye, and believe the gospel. Mark 1:15
The sodomite lifestyle produces vile affections, ungodly lust, reprobates
Repent or burn
Three gay rights: AIDS, hell, salvation


"There were four of us to begin with. We weren't preaching with any amplified sound," Pettigrew told WND. "Basically, as soon as we got out of the cars and started toward the sidewalk, Manchester city police officers showed up and asked us if we had a parade permit."

He continued, "We did not have a parade permit, and we informed them that we had no plans for obtaining a parade permit because we weren't in a parade."

Pettigrew said officers from the Manchester Police Department were initially cordial when they told him he must have a permit to stand on the sidewalk with his sign.

"We simply said, 'We can't do that. It's our constitutional right to free speech. We're not impeding any kind of traffic. We're peaceably assembled, so we're going to do what we came to do,'" he said.

At that moment, another officer arrived, joined the others and told the men they must obtain a permit to remain on the sidewalk.

Displeased with their answer, Pettigrew said, "they handcuffed us and took us to the city jail in Manchester."

Later, while Pettigrew and his comrades remained in jail, Pastor Ball and another man arrived at the street corner to share his message.
So, police arrested Ball.

Meanwhile, officers issued Pettigrew a citation, returned his belongings and ushered him out of jail.

"So we went back to the corner because it's America, and there was no sense in arresting us the first time," Pettigrew said. "We weren't going to let them bully us into going home."

He continued, "By the end of the day, I had been arrested three times, and my pastor was arrested four times – simply because we wouldn't go away."

Police confront Pettigrew's group while they hold signs

By dark, his group had grown to 11 men – including four who had driven from North Carolina and South Carolina to stand on the sidewalk and support the original four who had been arrested.

"By that time they had ceased arresting us, with the exception of my pastor, who was arrested late in the evening," Pettigrew said.

"We had some people who came down simply because we were being arrested."

With a tone of frustration, Pettigrew said, "We're sick and tired of people telling us what we can and can't do. It's not constitutional."

Sheriff's department arrives

When WND contacted Manchester police and asked why Pettigrew had been arrested, a lieutenant who would not provide his name replied, "I can't make any comments on that over the phone."

Pettigrew said one young man who was arrested with his group was contacted by the police department and told charges would be dropped if he brought the citation back.

He maintains that his group always obeys the law "as long as it doesn't interfere with constitutional rights." However, he believes authorities detained his small group based on its message against homosexuality.

"If I were holding a sign that said, 'Two large pizzas for $5,' I don't think I would have gotten a second look from police. I firmly and adamantly believe we were singled out and arrested because of the content of our speech," Pettigrew said.

"If they arrest us for proclaiming the word of God, what will they arrest us for next?" he asked. "We need to get the word out that the rights of the American people are quickly being taken away, and nobody even knows it."
.
.
.

Country Living Seminars & Gardening Workshops


Country Living Seminars / Gardening Workshop
Oct. 14 - 17 * Leoni Meadows Camp * Grizzly Flats, CA



How would you fare if, for whatever reason, the grocery store shelves were bare?
if your local water system was not functioning?
if the electricity was off?
Would you be able to provide for life’s most basic necessities as our forefathers did?
Would you like to learn common-sense skills of yester-year and start preparing to be a blessing to others in times of need rather than depending on someone else to provide for you?



Beautiful Leoni Meadows Camp in Northern California is the setting for 4 days of practical Country Living Seminars & hands-on Gardening Workshops from October 14-17! Lynn and Elizabeth Hoag will be teaming up with Mountain Media Ministries for this event, which will combine all of the practical Country Living Seminars that MMM presents PLUS Master Gardener Lynn Hoag will conduct hands-on Gardening & Tree Planting Workshops! Lynn was the presenter in the DVD Planting by the Blueprint.

These workshops/seminars focus on training you to be able to provide the basic NECESSITIES OF LIFE--water, food and heat/shelter--for not only your own family but also to be able to continue doing God's final work even when the systems of this world collapse or when we cannot buy or sell! On Friday evening and on Sabbath we will have spiritual meetings on the times we are living in, the spiritual aspects of country living, and on preparing.


Wednesday - Oct. 14
Providing for Life’s Basic Necessities - Craig Meissner
Gardening Workshop: - Lynn Hoag
Soil Preparation: Testing the soil - adding amendments to balance
Forming rows / double digging / fertilizers
Methods of gardening: Mittleider, Ocean Water, High Brix, and Ellen White
What to Look For in Land or a Country Home - Craig Meissner


Thursday - Oct. 15
Simultaneous Seminars:
Canning & Breadmaking - Nancy Meissner
Independent Water Systems & Heating With Wood - Craig & Nick Meissner
Gardening Workshop - Lynn Hoag
Fencing, Watering Systems and Planting
Deer and Gopher Fencing / Trellises for pole plants
Plant a winter garden
Equipping for the Mountains - Craig Meissner


Friday - Oct. 16
Alternative Energy Systems - Nick Meissner
Gardening Workshop - Lynn Hoag
Ellen White Tree Planting Method
Plant an apple tree the Ellen White Method & the Standard Nursery Method
How to grow food all year round
Silently, Stealthily, & Unsuspectedly - Craig Meissner


Sabbath - Oct. 17
Sabbath School - Lynn & Elizabeth Hoag
Preparation or Presumption? - Nick Meissner
More Good Reports - short video interviews with those who have already made the move
Question & Answer Time


Accommodations


Leoni Meadows Camp will be accepting your calls to reserve lodge rooms, cabins w/kitchenettes, dormitory accommodations, RV spaces or camping spaces directly with them! There should be an affordable accommodation for most every budget (camping fee is as low as $2.50/person/night)!


In addition, you can also make arrangements directly with them also for cafeteria meals if you desire. Call Jennifer at 530.626.3610 ext 1200 or email her at jent@leonimeadows.org to make these arrangements for lodging and/or meals.RegistrationThere are expenses that MMM and the Hoags will incur to do this 4 Day Seminar/Workshop, so there will be a workshop fee. For more details, please download the flier which also contains a registration form.

Lynn & Elizabeth Hoag - Sun Country Gardens -


Craig, Nancy, & Nick Meissner - Mountain Media Ministries - http://mountainmediaministries.org/


.

Keep the Faith Ministry Upcoming Events



Upcoming Events


August 28, 2009
Warburg, Alberta
Canada

September 5, 2009
Langdon, Alberta
Canada

September 11, 2009
Detroit, MI

September 18, 2009
Montalba, TX

September 26, 2009
Warragul, Australia

October 3, 2009
Box Hill, Australia

MORE EVENTS
.
.
.
.
.

Another Sabbath Ceremony In Washington D.C. (This August)



Tomorrow Saturday, 29th of August, 2009, the late Senator Edward M. Kennedy will be laid to rest at Arlington National Cemetery near the tombs of his brothers John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. It is scheduled to be something resembling a state funeral with military honor guards, a televised funeral procession, and the religious ceremony before internment.





Kennedy will be buried near his assassinated brothers - former President
Kennedy and former Sen. Robert F. Kennedy - at Arlington National Cemetery
in northern Virginia.
The burial fulfills Ted Kennedy's final wishes
he made with his wife.
Those that knew him said the senator spent a
lot of time at Arlington National Cemetery, visiting fallen soldiers and his
two brothers.



http://www.news8.net/news/stories/0809/654021.html


Three weeks ago (21 days ago), tomorrow, The New York Judge Sonia Sotomayor, was sworn in as a Supreme Court Justice during a private special ceremony officiated by John Roberts, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Sotomayor's swearing-in special service took place at 11 A.M., on Saturday, August 8, 2009.
Since the Senator passed away late Tuesday night, or early Wednesday morning it has been a steady stream of internet, and radio coverage. People from reporters, to commentators, to politicians on both sides of the "imaginary" bi-partisan divide have praised and lauded "Ted's" long career as a freedom fighter, and a man of the people. It's been a non-stop homage event.

Rep. John Lewis of Georgia, a longtime civil rights leader, praised Kennedy for his massive contributions to the cause of equal rights. "He's one man that changed America forever," Lewis said. "He made America a better place. ... Sen. Kennedy was our champion. He was our leader. He was our shepherd. Without him, we must regroup."

"The last year of his life was almost a gift, because he knew that he didn't have much time, but he was able to kind of take a victory lap," says Robert Kennedy Jr. "He was able to accept a lot of the tributes that were offered to him in the last year, and that was really touching to him."

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112326476&ps=cprs


This is indeed a solemn time for the relatives, and those who were close to "Ted" Kennedy;
But, frankly, I detect a tinge of theatrics with all the ceremonies and patronage.
Why do they always wait for a person to pass away to say so many good things about them?

We also remember that another Kennedy passed away just a few weeks ago. Mrs. Eunice Kennedy Shriver died August 11, 2009, at age 88. Two weeks later, her brother Edward Kennedy, passed away on August 25, 2009 at age 77.

Please, no more Camelot allusions! We have no royalty in the Western Hemisphere.*

We are all destined to die, sooner or later. They say that death is the great equalizer; No kings, no Princesses, we are all equally dead.

Again, back to the Sabbath Burial Services scheduled to span the whole day beginning in Boston, where they will have a Mass at a Basilica, then transport the remains of Senator Edward M. Kennedy to Washington D.C. for a full-fledged military burial at sunset.

My condolences to the loved ones. My sympathies in your loss.

And, to the faithful remnant a Blessed Happy Sabbath!

Arsenio.
.
.
*P.S. (Addendum) However, there is a considerable amount of knights; Such as Knights of Columbus, Knights of Malta, Knights of Eulogia, etc.

At UN, James Standish Returns to Church Representation

27 August 2009
At UN, James Standish Returns to Church Representation
By Alexander Carpenter


in





ANN reports that James Standish is returning to denominational employ as the Seventh-day Adventist Church's liaison to the United Nations.



Elizabeth Lechleitner writes:




James D. Standish, Esq., formerly longtime director of Legislative Affairs
for the Adventist Church, spent the past year as executive director of the
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, an independent
non-partisan federal agency advising the White House and Congress.

Working with the Commission gave him a broader understanding of the
"inner workings" of government and what can be accomplished through cooperation
and a candid exchange of ideas, Standish said.

"It's a real privilege to come back to work for the Adventist Church,"
he said. "I think that the church has so much to offer, from its understanding
of religious freedom to its emphasis on education and health care and its
thorough understanding of the gospel. Being part of that effort again from the
inside is something that I really look forward to."



This move comes at a time of ferment in the Adventist religious liberty world. Barry W. Bussey took over as Executive Director of NARLA. Church/State Council of the Pacific Union Conference, among others, is sponsoring a conference on gay marriage in October and the independent religiousliberty.tv increasingly provides the best up-to-date religious liberty news and commentary in the denomination and beyond.

According to un.adventist.org (which needs an update), "[t]he Seventh-day Adventist Church's Liaison Office to the United Nations is based at the Church's world headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland, USA. It serves to both communicate and represent the Church at the UN and also to inform the Church of UN activities of importance and interest."

The UN Liaison Office participates in a wide-range of UN summits, conferences, and committees, advising national representatives and non-government organizations of the Church's global program of education, health and spiritual development from the perspective of religious freedom and human rights, moral and ethical principles, and a commitment to an improved quality of life based on Christian beliefs.

Given the July news about possible cooperation between the church's health leadership and the UN's World Health Organization as well as lingering eschatologically-inflected, Bircher-esque fear of the UN, it will be interesting to see how Adventism navigates the UN's legendary inefficiencies and the pressures of globalization. But beyond the harsh realities of world politics and social change there is reason for Adventist eschatolotically-informed hope. The church leadership and laity face some serious choices about how best to protect our Sabbatarian rights and expand our witness to freedom of conscience for all. As we approach the second decade of the 21st century, let's embrace that hope by remembering Jesus' promise: "it is on this rock that I will build my congregation, and the powers of hell will not conquer it" (Matt 16).

Here's part one of Spectrum's podcast interviews with James Standish from May 2008. And podcast number two, from June 2008.


Source: http://www.spectrummagazine.org/blog/2009/08/27/un_james_standish_returns_church_representation

.

Commentary: Prosecuting CIA a foolish move

Story Highlights
Ruben Navarrette: Obama said he wanted to look forward, not back
He says polls show most Americans don't want investigation of CIA interrogations
He says Justice Department probe will demoralize agents who fight terror

August 28, 2009 -- Updated 1043 GMT
updated 2 hours, 57 minutes ago

By Ruben Navarrette Jr.
Special to CNN


Editor's note: Ruben Navarrette Jr., a nationally syndicated columnist and a regular contributor to CNN.com, is the author of "A Darker Shade of Crimson: Odyssey of a Harvard Chicano." Read his column here.



Ruben Navarrette Jr. says the administration's probe of CIA interrogations will demoralize agents who fight terror.





SAN DIEGO, California (CNN) -- The Obama administration actually has me feeling sorry for the Central Intelligence Agency. This week, the administration hit the CIA with both barrels.

First, it announced that the intelligence agency would no longer be responsible for interrogating suspects in terrorism cases. This task will now be conducted by a new group of interrogators overseen by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

There's hope and change for you. Those who applaud the change probably hope it means no more headlines like the one this week about how CIA interrogators threatened al Qaeda prisoner Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri with a gun and an electric drill to get information.

Al-Nashiri is accused of plotting the 2000 attack on the USS Cole, which left 17 U.S. sailors dead. Details of his alleged treatment came to light after a federal judge in New York ordered a redacted version of a CIA inspector-general's report released as part of a lawsuit.

The second blast came when U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder named a special prosecutor to investigate allegations of CIA prisoner abuse cases after the Justice Department's Office of Personal Responsibility -- the department's watchdog -- recommended considering prosecution of CIA employees or contractors for rough interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan that allegedly went beyond approved limits. Career federal prosecutor John Durham will lead the investigation.

Don't Miss
Borger: CIA flap a huge headache for Obama
In Depth: Commentaries

It's not every day that you see an administration devour itself. But that's pretty much what happens when you have the Justice Department investigating the CIA. This will poison the relationship between the entities, which still have to work together to keep America safe in the war on terror.

And we're expected to believe that Holder is acting on his own, without approval from the president. Obama has said he wants to "look forward, not back" and called this "a time for reflection, not retribution." Yet, this week, the White House said that decisions "about whether someone broke the law are made independently by the attorney general."

This is not a good look -- not for Holder, not for Obama and not for the administration.

Just ask the American people. In May, a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey found that 57 percent of those questioned didn't want Congress to investigate Bush officials who authorized harsh interrogation procedures. Forty-two percent supported an inquiry. Fifty-five percent of people also didn't want an investigation by an independent panel. At the time, no one asked how respondents would feel about a special prosecutor conducting his own investigation, but it's a good bet that this will also be unpopular.

What do Americans know that the Obama Justice Department doesn't? Maybe this: If you wanted to demoralize and destroy the country's intelligence agencies, and thus put its people at risk, you'd be hard-pressed to find a more effective way of doing it than by prosecuting CIA agents who did the nation's dirty work and acted in good faith, oftentimes after consulting with lawyers about the legality of their methods.

By the way, where did those lawyers work? This is the poetic part. In the case of Steven Bradbury, Jay Bybee, and John Yoo -- the authors of the so-called "torture memos" that were the subject of so much reporting a few months ago -- they worked in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department.

That would be the same Justice Department that is now investigating CIA officers for, in some cases, doing what the department's lawyers told them was legally permissible to do.

Just how far down the rabbit hole does this administration intend to go? The White House would have more credibility on the interrogation issue if it had not decided to continue the Bush administration's practice of rendition, which is basically the exporting of terrorism suspects to third-party countries for detention and interrogation.

The administration promises that the State Department will closely monitor the program to ensure that prisoners are not tortured. And, administration officials insist, the host countries have offered "diplomatic assurances" that they'll be on their best behavior.

This policy is a farce. The whole reason an administration uses rendition is because foreign countries have more latitude in questioning suspects and they can push boundaries to get information. If we try to take that away, then why continue the program? Why not just question suspects in the United States?

It points to the disingenuousness of this whole exercise. We want the intelligence, and we know that the lives of countless Americans might hinge on whether or not we get it. So we're not picky about what these host countries have to do to get terror suspects to spill the beans. We just like to play dumb about how the foreign authorities went about extracting it.

It's no wonder that human rights groups condemned the administration's decision, insisting that the rendition policy allows the transfer of prisoners to countries with a history of torture. They also pointed out that the Bush administration also got "diplomatic assurances" and that they were meaningless.

Those assurances are meaningless -- and pointless. Just like using the criminal justice system to settle scores and portray one administration as morally superior to another.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Ruben Navarrette Jr.


Source: http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/08/28/navarrette.cia/index.html?eref=igoogle_cnn

.

Health-care workers steer clear of swine flu vaccine

Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:24:05 GMT



While the world waits for an effective swine flu vaccine, a new study finds that the majority of health-care workers refuse to take the vaccine due to its possible side effects.

A/H1N1 has already infected some 182,166 individuals and has claimed the lives of at least 1,799 people across the globe.

Recent guidelines released by the World Health Organization have placed health-care workers among the first people to be inoculated against swine flu, not only to protect them against the virus but to protect their patients.

Many of them, however, have made it obvious that they are unwilling to be vaccinated.

According to a study published in British Medical Journal, more than half of health-care workers around the world are worried about the side effects of the new vaccine.

Doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine are also reported as another main reason for them declining the vaccine.

"Like the lay population, they assume they won't need the shot because they don't think they will get the flu," said George Annas.

Vaccination is considered as one of the potentially effective measures to tackle the spread of the virus and its complications. Its effectiveness, however, depends on the individual's uptake rate.

PKH/AA





Pure Religion


22But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.

23For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass:

24For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.

25But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.

26If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.


27Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world.


James 1:22-27.


.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Jesuits Fabricated the Rapture


Jesuits Fabricated the Rapture


The following is a response to a post from GuessN that claims that RAPTURE is a lie invented by Catholics and clandestinely fed to Protestants as their own, thus reducing their teachings to utter disrepute. Andrew's reaction is minimal since Catholicism does not make a big deal about the notion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GuessN writes:
The Catholic church INVENTED the Rapture (7 year) lie

Rooted in Catholicism
The foundation of the rapture theory was laid over 400 years ago upon the specific orders of the Catholic Church. Every Christian needs to understand how this fabrication of error was designed to neutralize the great Protestant Reformation.

If the facts of history were known by Protestants today who defend with such great emotion the rapture theory and the futurist antichrist doctrine, they would be horrified.Luther and his fellow reformers boldly identified the pope as the "man of sin," and labeled the Catholic Church as the antichrist of prophecy. In response to those charges, the hierarchy assigned two Jesuit priests to develop counter-interpretations which would turn the onus away from the Catholic Church.

In spite of the fact that the two men founded opposing schools of interpretation, their theories have survived to form the basis of most modern Protestant theology today. Not only did they effectively blunt Luther's assessment of the papacy as the antichrist, but they cleverly divided and diluted the "protest" of all the churches which grew out of the Reformation movement.
Andrew responds:
The Catholic faith has had a line of her own would-be prophets speaking about the Last Days. Regardless whether or not their testimonies are absolutely true, much of it remains speculation and private revelation. No one is obliged to believe even those supplementary elements that are in keeping with the deposit of faith.

The fact that certain Protestant groups borrowed from Catholic eschatology does not constitute a conspiracy on her part. Further, Luther's impassioned invective against the papacy can in no way be construed as serious theological deputation. It was rhetoric, pure and simple, from a reformer who often used foul and abusive language to win his arguments.

What blunted Luther's assessment of the papacy were the more sober men with peaceful spirits that followed and interpreted him. They would restore the New Testament canon after Luther's egotistical abrogation of important sections and seek civilized ways of living in Europe with their Catholic brethren. War and violence still took place, but the voice of sanity had not been utterly silenced.
GuessN writes:
Modern religious observers were astounded in January, 1984, when men like Billy Graham and Jerry Falwell meekly accepted and defended the establishment of United States political ties with the Vatican.

Why could those famous Protestant spokesmen see no danger in being allied with the Church of Rome? Because they are deceived, along with millions of others, by the Catholic-contrived theories of those two priests which have almost eclipsed the historic, biblical position of the Reformers.

If the spiritual descendants of Luther and Wesley now had the same doctrine which they taught, not a single Lutheran or Methodist would favor any kind of alliance with the papacy today.
Now let's take a look at these two Spanish priests who flooded the sixteenth century with their counter-Reformation propaganda. Alcazar of Seville applied all the beast prophecies to Antiochus Epiphanes, who lived long before the popes began to rule in Rome. His system of interpretation came to be known as the Preterist School of prophecy.On the other hand, Jesuit Francisco Ribera invented a system known as the Futurist School of interpretation.

He taught that the antichrist was to be some future superman who would appear near the end of time and continue in power for three and a half years. It is his clever, unscriptural theory which has been resurrected by modern evangelical Protestant Christians. And today millions of Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, etc., hold this anti-Protestant concoction of the Jesuits as some kind of infallible doctrine.

Yet, those same denominations claim to be faithful supporters of Protestant theology. Luther and other stalwart protestors against Catholic errors would be astounded if they were suddenly resurrected to hear what is being taught in the name of Protestantism.

In the early 1800s the futurist view of Jesuit Ribera passed through certain refinements and additions, including the seven-year tribulation and the snatching away of the saints. For the first time, it was espoused by Protestant teachers who were seeking ways of reconciliation with Rome. Through the influence and writings of John Nelson Darby of the Plymouth Brethren Church in England, the new doctrine spread to the United States. During the middle and latter nineteenth century, it received its biggest boost from Cyrus Scofield, who incorporated it into the notes of his Scofield Reference Bible published in 1909.
Andrew responds:
It is interesting that rapture is made the scapegoat for what the critic sees as unwarranted compromise with the Church of Rome. The Protestant view of rapture is not even officially espoused by Catholicism. It does not matter, because his starting point is not really rapture or the bible itself, rather it is a deep-seated hatred of the Catholic Church. Everything-- bible interpretation, religious speculation, and political alliances-- everything has to be judged in the light of this abiding prejudice.

It would not surprise me to learn that the critic is a former Catholic, such people often were ignorant of the faith initially and allow their pride and passions to pollute clear reasoning and charity. It should be said that some anti-Catholics if not most still accept the misbegotten theory of rapture. They would suggest that the identity of the anti-Christ is no secret, and that it is the Pope.

This is all very unfortunate because if the bishop of Rome is actually the visible head of the Church and Vicar of Christ, then THEY are the ones in league with the anti-Christ in human history. Just as the Roman emperors persecuted the Catholic Christian Church, they perpetuate the slander against and the martyrdom of the saints.
.
.
.
.

Why FDIC's Shrinking Cushion Is Bigger Than It Looks


Posted by: Theo Francis on August 27

The headlines look scary: The fund insuring U.S. bank deposits has shrunk to $10.4 billion from $17 billion in December and $52 billion in late 2007. The number of banks on the government’s problem list jumped to 416 from 305 last year. Forty-five banks have failed so far this year, more than in the last six years combined.

The banking industry is hurting, make no mistake. But before you stash your savings in your mattress, take a closer look at the numbers out today from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

They’re not rosy, but they might not be quite as scary as they seem, even if they signal more pain for the banks themselves.


Let's start with that $10.4 billion, a low-water mark not seen in the FDIC's deposit insurance fund since about 1993.

You get it by taking the FDIC's assets -- $21.6 billion in cash or equivalents and another $43.2 billion in other assets, largely accumulated by taking over failed banks -- and subtracting $22.4 billion in liabilities and another $32 billion for a "contingent loss reserve for expected failures." That leaves $10.4 billion left over.

But here's the good news: That contingent loss reserve is what the FDIC expects to shell out (over time) for bank failures going forward, taking into account worsening conditions. In other words, even after projecting the pain from the financial crisis, the FDIC still expects the deposit-insurance fund to be $10.4 billion in the black.

Granted, the FDIC's projections could be wrong, and $10.4 billion doesn't look like much measured against the more than $4.8 billion in deposits guaranteed by the agency. But even if the FDIC were off by 50%, and bank failures ultimately cost it $48 billion instead of $36 billion, the deposit fund would be only $1.6 billion in the hole.

That deficit wouldn't materialize all at once, but even if it did, the FDIC could meet close the deficit by drawing on a $100 billion line of credit from the Treasury for just this purpose -- and could even tap into another $400 billion with the approval of the Treasury and Federal Reserve.

The loan would come from the government, but not out of taxpayers pockets. Instead, the FDIC would assess fees on surviving banks. Granted, tose fees would largely be passed on to you and me, but only indirectly, in the form of lower interest on our deposits. It's probably still more than you'll get from your mattress.

From a bank's perspective, and from a bank investor's, the picture is a little bleaker, of course. Generally the FDIC tries to keep its fund at 1.25% of insured deposits, and while it has proposed jiggering the formula to put more of the burden on bigger banks, getting back to that level from less than 0.25% will take some cash. Once again, that cash comes from surviving banks -- even if the FDIC doesn't blow through its remaining cushion.

To get back to normal, analysts suggest the FDIC's assessment could rise to 30 or 40 basis points (0.3% to 0.4%) of deposits. It doesn't sound like much, but it's high historically. For many banks it could amount to maybe 10% of revenues from deposits, or a quarter to a third of their margins. They can only cut the interest rates they pay us so much to absorb that (you're lucky to get close to 1.5% on savings these days), meaning investors could take a hit.

Then again, the surviving banks would also divvy up our banking business going forward, so it wouldn't be a complete loss.

.


..